Validity of a screening instrument for neurologic disability in resource-poor African communities

James Howard Bower, Emanuel Mwendo, Richard Walker, Venance Maro, Fikre Enquosellasie, Seid Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There have been no recent population-based studies on all-cause adult neurological morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. We have developed a screening survey to improve the feasibility in performing these studies. Methods: Our screening instrument contains both history questions and examination items. We pilot tested this instrument in the Hai District, Tanzania, and Butajira, Ethiopia using trained individuals from the local communities. To measure sensitivity, we applied the instrument blindly to 25 previously-identified subjects with Parkinson's disease, stroke or epilepsy. To measure specificity, we examined 42 randomly selected previously screened subjects. We also compared the validity of the entire instrument to the history-only section. Results: There were 669 adult subjects screened in both communities (150 screen-positives, and 519 screen-negatives). The sensitivity of the instrument was 100% (95% CI 84.2-100%) and the specificity was 82.4% (95% CI 66.1-92.0%). However, when restricting the instrument to the history-only section, the sensitivity remained unchanged, but the specificity became 91.2% (95% CI 76.3-97.7%; p = 0.48). Conclusions: We have created a valid tool to screen adults for neurologic morbidity in resource-poor communities. The use of the history-only section of the tool is adequate as a screen and will improve feasibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-55
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume320
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2012

Fingerprint

Nervous System
History
Morbidity
Ethiopia
Tanzania
Africa South of the Sahara
Parkinson Disease
Epilepsy
Stroke
Population

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Community-based
  • Neurologic disability
  • Neurologic impairment
  • Neurology
  • Population based
  • Prevalence
  • Resource-poor settings
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Validity of a screening instrument for neurologic disability in resource-poor African communities. / Bower, James Howard; Mwendo, Emanuel; Walker, Richard; Maro, Venance; Enquosellasie, Fikre; Ali, Seid.

In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Vol. 320, No. 1-2, 15.09.2012, p. 52-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bower, James Howard ; Mwendo, Emanuel ; Walker, Richard ; Maro, Venance ; Enquosellasie, Fikre ; Ali, Seid. / Validity of a screening instrument for neurologic disability in resource-poor African communities. In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 320, No. 1-2. pp. 52-55.
@article{ec6e00f3b18e4be1860e0a582dfcfc8f,
title = "Validity of a screening instrument for neurologic disability in resource-poor African communities",
abstract = "Background: There have been no recent population-based studies on all-cause adult neurological morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. We have developed a screening survey to improve the feasibility in performing these studies. Methods: Our screening instrument contains both history questions and examination items. We pilot tested this instrument in the Hai District, Tanzania, and Butajira, Ethiopia using trained individuals from the local communities. To measure sensitivity, we applied the instrument blindly to 25 previously-identified subjects with Parkinson's disease, stroke or epilepsy. To measure specificity, we examined 42 randomly selected previously screened subjects. We also compared the validity of the entire instrument to the history-only section. Results: There were 669 adult subjects screened in both communities (150 screen-positives, and 519 screen-negatives). The sensitivity of the instrument was 100{\%} (95{\%} CI 84.2-100{\%}) and the specificity was 82.4{\%} (95{\%} CI 66.1-92.0{\%}). However, when restricting the instrument to the history-only section, the sensitivity remained unchanged, but the specificity became 91.2{\%} (95{\%} CI 76.3-97.7{\%}; p = 0.48). Conclusions: We have created a valid tool to screen adults for neurologic morbidity in resource-poor communities. The use of the history-only section of the tool is adequate as a screen and will improve feasibility.",
keywords = "Africa, Community-based, Neurologic disability, Neurologic impairment, Neurology, Population based, Prevalence, Resource-poor settings, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Bower, {James Howard} and Emanuel Mwendo and Richard Walker and Venance Maro and Fikre Enquosellasie and Seid Ali",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2012.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "320",
pages = "52--55",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of a screening instrument for neurologic disability in resource-poor African communities

AU - Bower, James Howard

AU - Mwendo, Emanuel

AU - Walker, Richard

AU - Maro, Venance

AU - Enquosellasie, Fikre

AU - Ali, Seid

PY - 2012/9/15

Y1 - 2012/9/15

N2 - Background: There have been no recent population-based studies on all-cause adult neurological morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. We have developed a screening survey to improve the feasibility in performing these studies. Methods: Our screening instrument contains both history questions and examination items. We pilot tested this instrument in the Hai District, Tanzania, and Butajira, Ethiopia using trained individuals from the local communities. To measure sensitivity, we applied the instrument blindly to 25 previously-identified subjects with Parkinson's disease, stroke or epilepsy. To measure specificity, we examined 42 randomly selected previously screened subjects. We also compared the validity of the entire instrument to the history-only section. Results: There were 669 adult subjects screened in both communities (150 screen-positives, and 519 screen-negatives). The sensitivity of the instrument was 100% (95% CI 84.2-100%) and the specificity was 82.4% (95% CI 66.1-92.0%). However, when restricting the instrument to the history-only section, the sensitivity remained unchanged, but the specificity became 91.2% (95% CI 76.3-97.7%; p = 0.48). Conclusions: We have created a valid tool to screen adults for neurologic morbidity in resource-poor communities. The use of the history-only section of the tool is adequate as a screen and will improve feasibility.

AB - Background: There have been no recent population-based studies on all-cause adult neurological morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. We have developed a screening survey to improve the feasibility in performing these studies. Methods: Our screening instrument contains both history questions and examination items. We pilot tested this instrument in the Hai District, Tanzania, and Butajira, Ethiopia using trained individuals from the local communities. To measure sensitivity, we applied the instrument blindly to 25 previously-identified subjects with Parkinson's disease, stroke or epilepsy. To measure specificity, we examined 42 randomly selected previously screened subjects. We also compared the validity of the entire instrument to the history-only section. Results: There were 669 adult subjects screened in both communities (150 screen-positives, and 519 screen-negatives). The sensitivity of the instrument was 100% (95% CI 84.2-100%) and the specificity was 82.4% (95% CI 66.1-92.0%). However, when restricting the instrument to the history-only section, the sensitivity remained unchanged, but the specificity became 91.2% (95% CI 76.3-97.7%; p = 0.48). Conclusions: We have created a valid tool to screen adults for neurologic morbidity in resource-poor communities. The use of the history-only section of the tool is adequate as a screen and will improve feasibility.

KW - Africa

KW - Community-based

KW - Neurologic disability

KW - Neurologic impairment

KW - Neurology

KW - Population based

KW - Prevalence

KW - Resource-poor settings

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864605241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864605241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2012.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2012.06.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22795389

AN - SCOPUS:84864605241

VL - 320

SP - 52

EP - 55

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

IS - 1-2

ER -