TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics
AU - Morrow, Melissa M.B.
AU - Lowndes, Bethany
AU - Fortune, Emma
AU - Kaufman, Kenton R.
AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan
N1 - Funding Information:
This publication was made possible by funding from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and by the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD84423-01). None of the authors has a conflict of interest to declare, and all authors were involved in the study design, data collection, and interpretation, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.
AB - The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Ergonomics
KW - IMU
KW - Shoulder
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027079590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027079590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.2016-0120
DO - 10.1123/jab.2016-0120
M3 - Article
C2 - 27918696
AN - SCOPUS:85027079590
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 33
SP - 227
EP - 232
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 3
ER -