TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of dual-source single-tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction
T2 - Phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE)
AU - Fletcher, Joel G.
AU - Grant, Katharine L.R.
AU - Fidler, Jeff L.
AU - Shiung, Maria
AU - Yu, Lifeng
AU - Wang, Jia
AU - Schmidt, Bernhard
AU - Allmendinger, Thomas
AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. METHODS: Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. RESULTS: Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. METHODS: Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. RESULTS: Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.
KW - CT colonography
KW - dose reduction
KW - noise reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866673170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866673170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318263cc1b
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318263cc1b
M3 - Article
C2 - 22992607
AN - SCOPUS:84866673170
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 36
SP - 560
EP - 569
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 5
ER -