Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy

Christopher M. Wittich, Wojciech Pawlina, Richard L. Drake, Jason H. Szostek, Darcy A. Reed, Nirusha Lachman, Jennifer M. Mcbride, Jayawant Mandrekar, Thomas J. Beckman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 α = 0.78; Factor 2 α = 0.69; Factor 3 α = 0.70; Overall α = 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores (P = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 6: 232-238.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-238
Number of pages7
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Anatomy
Validation Studies
Medical Schools
Statistical Factor Analysis
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Medicine
Professionalism
Prospective Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Critical reflection
  • Gross anatomy education
  • Professionalism
  • Undergraduate medical education
  • Validation study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Embryology

Cite this

Wittich, C. M., Pawlina, W., Drake, R. L., Szostek, J. H., Reed, D. A., Lachman, N., ... Beckman, T. J. (2013). Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(4), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1329

Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy. / Wittich, Christopher M.; Pawlina, Wojciech; Drake, Richard L.; Szostek, Jason H.; Reed, Darcy A.; Lachman, Nirusha; Mcbride, Jennifer M.; Mandrekar, Jayawant; Beckman, Thomas J.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 6, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 232-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wittich, CM, Pawlina, W, Drake, RL, Szostek, JH, Reed, DA, Lachman, N, Mcbride, JM, Mandrekar, J & Beckman, TJ 2013, 'Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy', Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1329
Wittich, Christopher M. ; Pawlina, Wojciech ; Drake, Richard L. ; Szostek, Jason H. ; Reed, Darcy A. ; Lachman, Nirusha ; Mcbride, Jennifer M. ; Mandrekar, Jayawant ; Beckman, Thomas J. / Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy. In: Anatomical Sciences Education. 2013 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 232-238.
@article{0da598a211df44a7882a98cd8857f35f,
title = "Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy",
abstract = "Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 α = 0.78; Factor 2 α = 0.69; Factor 3 α = 0.70; Overall α = 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores (P = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 6: 232-238.",
keywords = "Critical reflection, Gross anatomy education, Professionalism, Undergraduate medical education, Validation study",
author = "Wittich, {Christopher M.} and Wojciech Pawlina and Drake, {Richard L.} and Szostek, {Jason H.} and Reed, {Darcy A.} and Nirusha Lachman and Mcbride, {Jennifer M.} and Jayawant Mandrekar and Beckman, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/ase.1329",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "232--238",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy

AU - Wittich, Christopher M.

AU - Pawlina, Wojciech

AU - Drake, Richard L.

AU - Szostek, Jason H.

AU - Reed, Darcy A.

AU - Lachman, Nirusha

AU - Mcbride, Jennifer M.

AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant

AU - Beckman, Thomas J.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 α = 0.78; Factor 2 α = 0.69; Factor 3 α = 0.70; Overall α = 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores (P = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 6: 232-238.

AB - Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 α = 0.78; Factor 2 α = 0.69; Factor 3 α = 0.70; Overall α = 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores (P = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 6: 232-238.

KW - Critical reflection

KW - Gross anatomy education

KW - Professionalism

KW - Undergraduate medical education

KW - Validation study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880038934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880038934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.1329

DO - 10.1002/ase.1329

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 232

EP - 238

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 4

ER -