TY - JOUR
T1 - Vagal nerve stimulation for intractable hiccups is not a panacea
T2 - a case report and review of the literature
AU - Grewal, Sanjeet S.
AU - Adams, Andrea C.
AU - Van Gompel, Jamie
PY - 2018/7/2
Y1 - 2018/7/2
N2 - Introduction: Hiccups are common and typically resolve spontaneously. However, in rare cases, they can continue for days, weeks or even years, causing significant morbidity and discomfort in patients. In the setting of intractable hiccups, vagal nerve stimulation has been reported in two cases. Objectives: This is a case report and review of the literature regarding the use of vagal nerve stimulators for intractable hiccups. Specifically, this report highlights a case where this therapy was not effective, as two prior case reports have reported positive results. Case report: A 52-year-old man presented with multiple years of intractable hiccups. A workup revealed no identifiable aetiology, and he had failed multiple medical therapies. A phrenic nerve block was attempted, which was not beneficial. Vagal maneuvers, specifically the induction of emesis, did consistently provide transient relief of his symptoms, and, therefore, the decision was made to proceed with a trial of vagal nerve stimulation after review of the literature supported the therapy. Despite 8 months with multiple stimulation parameters, the patient did not have any significant benefit from vagal nerve stimulation. Conclusions: Intractable idiopathic hiccups continue to present a significant challenge for physicians and patients. While vagal nerve stimulation is a potentially beneficial therapy, it is not effective in all patients with central idiopathic intractable hiccups.
AB - Introduction: Hiccups are common and typically resolve spontaneously. However, in rare cases, they can continue for days, weeks or even years, causing significant morbidity and discomfort in patients. In the setting of intractable hiccups, vagal nerve stimulation has been reported in two cases. Objectives: This is a case report and review of the literature regarding the use of vagal nerve stimulators for intractable hiccups. Specifically, this report highlights a case where this therapy was not effective, as two prior case reports have reported positive results. Case report: A 52-year-old man presented with multiple years of intractable hiccups. A workup revealed no identifiable aetiology, and he had failed multiple medical therapies. A phrenic nerve block was attempted, which was not beneficial. Vagal maneuvers, specifically the induction of emesis, did consistently provide transient relief of his symptoms, and, therefore, the decision was made to proceed with a trial of vagal nerve stimulation after review of the literature supported the therapy. Despite 8 months with multiple stimulation parameters, the patient did not have any significant benefit from vagal nerve stimulation. Conclusions: Intractable idiopathic hiccups continue to present a significant challenge for physicians and patients. While vagal nerve stimulation is a potentially beneficial therapy, it is not effective in all patients with central idiopathic intractable hiccups.
KW - Hiccups
KW - neuromodulation
KW - vagal nerve stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049605464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049605464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00207454.2018.1486307
DO - 10.1080/00207454.2018.1486307
M3 - Article
C2 - 29882681
AN - SCOPUS:85049605464
SN - 0020-7454
SP - 1
EP - 4
JO - International Journal of Neuroscience
JF - International Journal of Neuroscience
ER -