Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents: An approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial

Sandeep Kadimpati, Jennifer B. McCormick, Yichen Chiu, Ashley B. Parker, Aliya Z. Iftikhar, Randall Flick, David Oman Warner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In the recent literature, there has been some evidence that exposure of children to anesthetic procedures during the first 2 years of life may impair cognitive function and learning in later life. We planned a clinical study to quantify this risk, a study involving testing 1,000 children for neurodevelopmental deficits. As a part of this planning, we conducted focus groups involving potential participants and their parents to elicit information regarding three issues: communications with the community and potential participants, recruitment and consent processes, and the return of neurodevelopmental testing results. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with the parents of potential participants and one focus group was conducted with a group 18 years old; each group consisted of 6-10 participants. The moderated discussions had questions about recruitment, consenting issues, and expectations from the study about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. Results: The focus group data gave us insight into potential participants' views on recruitment, consenting, communications about the study, and expectations about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. The concerns expressed were largely addressable. In addition, the concern we had about some parents enrolling their children in the study solely for the sake of getting their child's cognitive function results was dispelled. Conclusions: We found that the individuals participating in our focus groups were generally enthusiastic about the large clinical study and could see the value in answering the study question. The data from the focus groups were used to inform changes to the recruitment and consent process. Focus group input was also instrumental in affirming the study design regarding return of results. Our experience suggests that the approach we used may serve as a model for other investigators to help inform the various elements of clinical study design, in particular the recruitment and consenting processes and expectations of potential participants regarding the return of individual research findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-38
Number of pages8
JournalAJOB Empirical Bioethics
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
parents
Parents
Clinical Trials
Group
Cognition
Communication
Research
communications
Anesthetics
pharmaceutical
Research Personnel
Learning
deficit
planning
Clinical Studies
learning

Keywords

  • Anesthesia
  • Focus groups
  • Learning disability
  • Research trial participation
  • Return of test results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents : An approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial. / Kadimpati, Sandeep; McCormick, Jennifer B.; Chiu, Yichen; Parker, Ashley B.; Iftikhar, Aliya Z.; Flick, Randall; Warner, David Oman.

In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2014, p. 31-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kadimpati, Sandeep ; McCormick, Jennifer B. ; Chiu, Yichen ; Parker, Ashley B. ; Iftikhar, Aliya Z. ; Flick, Randall ; Warner, David Oman. / Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents : An approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial. In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 31-38.
@article{ec6731fd013a401592ab1b9e9343e0c8,
title = "Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents: An approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial",
abstract = "Background: In the recent literature, there has been some evidence that exposure of children to anesthetic procedures during the first 2 years of life may impair cognitive function and learning in later life. We planned a clinical study to quantify this risk, a study involving testing 1,000 children for neurodevelopmental deficits. As a part of this planning, we conducted focus groups involving potential participants and their parents to elicit information regarding three issues: communications with the community and potential participants, recruitment and consent processes, and the return of neurodevelopmental testing results. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with the parents of potential participants and one focus group was conducted with a group 18 years old; each group consisted of 6-10 participants. The moderated discussions had questions about recruitment, consenting issues, and expectations from the study about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. Results: The focus group data gave us insight into potential participants' views on recruitment, consenting, communications about the study, and expectations about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. The concerns expressed were largely addressable. In addition, the concern we had about some parents enrolling their children in the study solely for the sake of getting their child's cognitive function results was dispelled. Conclusions: We found that the individuals participating in our focus groups were generally enthusiastic about the large clinical study and could see the value in answering the study question. The data from the focus groups were used to inform changes to the recruitment and consent process. Focus group input was also instrumental in affirming the study design regarding return of results. Our experience suggests that the approach we used may serve as a model for other investigators to help inform the various elements of clinical study design, in particular the recruitment and consenting processes and expectations of potential participants regarding the return of individual research findings.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, Focus groups, Learning disability, Research trial participation, Return of test results",
author = "Sandeep Kadimpati and McCormick, {Jennifer B.} and Yichen Chiu and Parker, {Ashley B.} and Iftikhar, {Aliya Z.} and Randall Flick and Warner, {David Oman}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/23294515.2013.879353",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "31--38",
journal = "AJOB Empirical Bioethics",
issn = "2329-4515",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilizing focus groups with potential participants and their parents

T2 - An approach to inform study design in a large clinical trial

AU - Kadimpati, Sandeep

AU - McCormick, Jennifer B.

AU - Chiu, Yichen

AU - Parker, Ashley B.

AU - Iftikhar, Aliya Z.

AU - Flick, Randall

AU - Warner, David Oman

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: In the recent literature, there has been some evidence that exposure of children to anesthetic procedures during the first 2 years of life may impair cognitive function and learning in later life. We planned a clinical study to quantify this risk, a study involving testing 1,000 children for neurodevelopmental deficits. As a part of this planning, we conducted focus groups involving potential participants and their parents to elicit information regarding three issues: communications with the community and potential participants, recruitment and consent processes, and the return of neurodevelopmental testing results. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with the parents of potential participants and one focus group was conducted with a group 18 years old; each group consisted of 6-10 participants. The moderated discussions had questions about recruitment, consenting issues, and expectations from the study about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. Results: The focus group data gave us insight into potential participants' views on recruitment, consenting, communications about the study, and expectations about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. The concerns expressed were largely addressable. In addition, the concern we had about some parents enrolling their children in the study solely for the sake of getting their child's cognitive function results was dispelled. Conclusions: We found that the individuals participating in our focus groups were generally enthusiastic about the large clinical study and could see the value in answering the study question. The data from the focus groups were used to inform changes to the recruitment and consent process. Focus group input was also instrumental in affirming the study design regarding return of results. Our experience suggests that the approach we used may serve as a model for other investigators to help inform the various elements of clinical study design, in particular the recruitment and consenting processes and expectations of potential participants regarding the return of individual research findings.

AB - Background: In the recent literature, there has been some evidence that exposure of children to anesthetic procedures during the first 2 years of life may impair cognitive function and learning in later life. We planned a clinical study to quantify this risk, a study involving testing 1,000 children for neurodevelopmental deficits. As a part of this planning, we conducted focus groups involving potential participants and their parents to elicit information regarding three issues: communications with the community and potential participants, recruitment and consent processes, and the return of neurodevelopmental testing results. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with the parents of potential participants and one focus group was conducted with a group 18 years old; each group consisted of 6-10 participants. The moderated discussions had questions about recruitment, consenting issues, and expectations from the study about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. Results: The focus group data gave us insight into potential participants' views on recruitment, consenting, communications about the study, and expectations about return of both overall trial findings and individual research test results. The concerns expressed were largely addressable. In addition, the concern we had about some parents enrolling their children in the study solely for the sake of getting their child's cognitive function results was dispelled. Conclusions: We found that the individuals participating in our focus groups were generally enthusiastic about the large clinical study and could see the value in answering the study question. The data from the focus groups were used to inform changes to the recruitment and consent process. Focus group input was also instrumental in affirming the study design regarding return of results. Our experience suggests that the approach we used may serve as a model for other investigators to help inform the various elements of clinical study design, in particular the recruitment and consenting processes and expectations of potential participants regarding the return of individual research findings.

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Focus groups

KW - Learning disability

KW - Research trial participation

KW - Return of test results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904512348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904512348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23294515.2013.879353

DO - 10.1080/23294515.2013.879353

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904512348

VL - 5

SP - 31

EP - 38

JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

SN - 2329-4515

IS - 3

ER -