Utilization of minimally invasive surgery in endometrial cancer care: A Quality and cost disparity

Amanda N. Fader, R. Matsuno Weise, Abdulrahman K. Sinno, Edward J. Tanner, Bijan J. Borah, James P. Moriarty, Robert E. Bristow, Martin A. Makary, Peter J. Pronovost, Susan Hutfless, Sean C. Dowdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe case mix-Adjusted hospital level utilization of minimally invasive surgery for hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the proportion of patients who had a minimally invasive compared with open hysterectomy for nonmetastatic endometrial cancer using the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 2007-2011. Hospitals were stratified by endometrial cancer case volumes (low5less than 10; medium511-30; high5greater than 30 cases). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate hospital and patient variables associated with minimally invasive utilization, complications, and costs. RESULTS: Overall, 32,560 patients were identified; 33.6% underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy with an increase of 22.0-50.8% from 2007 to 2011. Low-volume cancer centers demonstrated the lowest minimally invasive utilization rate (23.6%; P,.001). After multivariable adjustment, minimally invasive surgery was less likely to be performed in patients with Medicaid compared with private insurance (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.72), black and Hispanic compared with white patients (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.41-0.46 for black and 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82 for white patients), and more likely to be performed in highcompared with low-volume hospitals (adjusted OR 4.22, 95% CI 2.15-8.27). Open hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk of surgical site infection (adjusted OR 6.21, 95% CI 5.11-7.54) and venous thromboembolism (adjusted OR 3.65, 95% CI 3.12-4.27). Surgical cases with complications had higher mean hospitalization costs for all hysterectomy procedure types (P,.001). CONCLUSION: Hospital utilization of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer varies considerably in the United States, representing a disparity in the quality and cost of surgical care delivered nationwide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Fader, A. N., Matsuno Weise, R., Sinno, A. K., Tanner, E. J., Borah, B. J., Moriarty, J. P., Bristow, R. E., Makary, M. A., Pronovost, P. J., Hutfless, S., & Dowdy, S. C. (2016). Utilization of minimally invasive surgery in endometrial cancer care: A Quality and cost disparity. Obstetrics and gynecology, 127(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001180