Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis

Angela K. Muriithi, Samih H. Nasr, Nelson Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives Urine eosinophils (UEs) have been shown to correlate with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) but the four largest series that investigated the test characteristics did not use kidney biopsy as the gold standard. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a retrospective study of adult patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses and UE tests performed from 1994 to 2011. UEs were tested using Hansel's stain. Both 1% and 5% UE cutoffs were compared. Results This study identified 566 patients with both a UE test and a native kidney biopsy performed within a week of each other. Of these patients, 322 were men and the mean age was 59 years. There were 467 patients with pyuria, defined as at least one white cell per high-power field. There were 91 patients with AIN (80% was drug induced). A variety of kidney diseases had UEs. Using a 1% UE cutoff, the comparison of all patients with AIN to those with all other diagnoses showed 30.8% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity, giving positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01, respectively. Given this study's 16% prevalence of AIN, the positive and negative predictive values were 15.6% and 83.7%, respectively. At the 5% UE cutoff, sensitivity declined, but specificity improved. The presence of pyuria improved the sensitivity somewhat, with a decrease in specificity. UEs were no better at distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis compared with other kidney diseases. Conclusions UEs were found in a variety of kidney diseases besides AIN. At the commonly used 1% UE cutoff, the test does not shift pretest probability of AIN in any direction. Even at a 5% cutoff, UEs performed poorly in distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis or other kidney diseases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1857-1862
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume8
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 7 2013

Fingerprint

Interstitial Nephritis
Eosinophils
Urine
Kidney Diseases
Pyuria
Biopsy
Necrosis
Kidney
Sensitivity and Specificity
Coloring Agents
Retrospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. / Muriithi, Angela K.; Nasr, Samih H.; Leung, Nelson.

In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vol. 8, No. 11, 07.11.2013, p. 1857-1862.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muriithi, Angela K. ; Nasr, Samih H. ; Leung, Nelson. / Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 11. pp. 1857-1862.
@article{2df2aa25cf024a7492fb4573480422c9,
title = "Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis",
abstract = "Background and objectives Urine eosinophils (UEs) have been shown to correlate with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) but the four largest series that investigated the test characteristics did not use kidney biopsy as the gold standard. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a retrospective study of adult patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses and UE tests performed from 1994 to 2011. UEs were tested using Hansel's stain. Both 1{\%} and 5{\%} UE cutoffs were compared. Results This study identified 566 patients with both a UE test and a native kidney biopsy performed within a week of each other. Of these patients, 322 were men and the mean age was 59 years. There were 467 patients with pyuria, defined as at least one white cell per high-power field. There were 91 patients with AIN (80{\%} was drug induced). A variety of kidney diseases had UEs. Using a 1{\%} UE cutoff, the comparison of all patients with AIN to those with all other diagnoses showed 30.8{\%} sensitivity and 68.2{\%} specificity, giving positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01, respectively. Given this study's 16{\%} prevalence of AIN, the positive and negative predictive values were 15.6{\%} and 83.7{\%}, respectively. At the 5{\%} UE cutoff, sensitivity declined, but specificity improved. The presence of pyuria improved the sensitivity somewhat, with a decrease in specificity. UEs were no better at distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis compared with other kidney diseases. Conclusions UEs were found in a variety of kidney diseases besides AIN. At the commonly used 1{\%} UE cutoff, the test does not shift pretest probability of AIN in any direction. Even at a 5{\%} cutoff, UEs performed poorly in distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis or other kidney diseases.",
author = "Muriithi, {Angela K.} and Nasr, {Samih H.} and Nelson Leung",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.2215/CJN.01330213",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1857--1862",
journal = "Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology",
issn = "1555-9041",
publisher = "American Society of Nephrology",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of urine eosinophils in the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis

AU - Muriithi, Angela K.

AU - Nasr, Samih H.

AU - Leung, Nelson

PY - 2013/11/7

Y1 - 2013/11/7

N2 - Background and objectives Urine eosinophils (UEs) have been shown to correlate with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) but the four largest series that investigated the test characteristics did not use kidney biopsy as the gold standard. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a retrospective study of adult patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses and UE tests performed from 1994 to 2011. UEs were tested using Hansel's stain. Both 1% and 5% UE cutoffs were compared. Results This study identified 566 patients with both a UE test and a native kidney biopsy performed within a week of each other. Of these patients, 322 were men and the mean age was 59 years. There were 467 patients with pyuria, defined as at least one white cell per high-power field. There were 91 patients with AIN (80% was drug induced). A variety of kidney diseases had UEs. Using a 1% UE cutoff, the comparison of all patients with AIN to those with all other diagnoses showed 30.8% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity, giving positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01, respectively. Given this study's 16% prevalence of AIN, the positive and negative predictive values were 15.6% and 83.7%, respectively. At the 5% UE cutoff, sensitivity declined, but specificity improved. The presence of pyuria improved the sensitivity somewhat, with a decrease in specificity. UEs were no better at distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis compared with other kidney diseases. Conclusions UEs were found in a variety of kidney diseases besides AIN. At the commonly used 1% UE cutoff, the test does not shift pretest probability of AIN in any direction. Even at a 5% cutoff, UEs performed poorly in distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis or other kidney diseases.

AB - Background and objectives Urine eosinophils (UEs) have been shown to correlate with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) but the four largest series that investigated the test characteristics did not use kidney biopsy as the gold standard. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This is a retrospective study of adult patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses and UE tests performed from 1994 to 2011. UEs were tested using Hansel's stain. Both 1% and 5% UE cutoffs were compared. Results This study identified 566 patients with both a UE test and a native kidney biopsy performed within a week of each other. Of these patients, 322 were men and the mean age was 59 years. There were 467 patients with pyuria, defined as at least one white cell per high-power field. There were 91 patients with AIN (80% was drug induced). A variety of kidney diseases had UEs. Using a 1% UE cutoff, the comparison of all patients with AIN to those with all other diagnoses showed 30.8% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity, giving positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.97 and 1.01, respectively. Given this study's 16% prevalence of AIN, the positive and negative predictive values were 15.6% and 83.7%, respectively. At the 5% UE cutoff, sensitivity declined, but specificity improved. The presence of pyuria improved the sensitivity somewhat, with a decrease in specificity. UEs were no better at distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis compared with other kidney diseases. Conclusions UEs were found in a variety of kidney diseases besides AIN. At the commonly used 1% UE cutoff, the test does not shift pretest probability of AIN in any direction. Even at a 5% cutoff, UEs performed poorly in distinguishing AIN from acute tubular necrosis or other kidney diseases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887291150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887291150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2215/CJN.01330213

DO - 10.2215/CJN.01330213

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1857

EP - 1862

JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

SN - 1555-9041

IS - 11

ER -