Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading

Lars Egevad, Brett Delahunt, Daniel M. Berney, David G. Bostwick, John Cheville, Eva Comperat, Andrew J. Evans, Samson W. Fine, David J. Grignon, Peter A. Humphrey, Jonas Hörnblad, Kenneth A. Iczkowski, James G. Kench, Glen Kristiansen, Katia R.M. Leite, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Jesse K. Mckenney, Jon Oxley, Chin Chen Pan, Hemamali SamaratungaJohn R. Srigley, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Lawrence D. True, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Theo van der Kwast, Murali Varma, Ming Zhou, Mark Clements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading. Methods and results: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHistopathology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Pathology
Neoplasm Grading
Databases
Prostate
Observer Variation
Needle Biopsy
Libraries
Confidence Intervals
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Database
  • Grading
  • International Society of Urological Pathology
  • Prostate
  • Standardisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

Egevad, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Cheville, J., Comperat, E., ... Clements, M. (Accepted/In press). Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13471

Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading. / Egevad, Lars; Delahunt, Brett; Berney, Daniel M.; Bostwick, David G.; Cheville, John; Comperat, Eva; Evans, Andrew J.; Fine, Samson W.; Grignon, David J.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Hörnblad, Jonas; Iczkowski, Kenneth A.; Kench, James G.; Kristiansen, Glen; Leite, Katia R.M.; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina; Mckenney, Jesse K.; Oxley, Jon; Pan, Chin Chen; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Srigley, John R.; Takahashi, Hiroyuki; True, Lawrence D.; Tsuzuki, Toyonori; van der Kwast, Theo; Varma, Murali; Zhou, Ming; Clements, Mark.

In: Histopathology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Egevad, L, Delahunt, B, Berney, DM, Bostwick, DG, Cheville, J, Comperat, E, Evans, AJ, Fine, SW, Grignon, DJ, Humphrey, PA, Hörnblad, J, Iczkowski, KA, Kench, JG, Kristiansen, G, Leite, KRM, Magi-Galluzzi, C, Mckenney, JK, Oxley, J, Pan, CC, Samaratunga, H, Srigley, JR, Takahashi, H, True, LD, Tsuzuki, T, van der Kwast, T, Varma, M, Zhou, M & Clements, M 2018, 'Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading', Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13471
Egevad L, Delahunt B, Berney DM, Bostwick DG, Cheville J, Comperat E et al. Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading. Histopathology. 2018 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13471
Egevad, Lars ; Delahunt, Brett ; Berney, Daniel M. ; Bostwick, David G. ; Cheville, John ; Comperat, Eva ; Evans, Andrew J. ; Fine, Samson W. ; Grignon, David J. ; Humphrey, Peter A. ; Hörnblad, Jonas ; Iczkowski, Kenneth A. ; Kench, James G. ; Kristiansen, Glen ; Leite, Katia R.M. ; Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ; Mckenney, Jesse K. ; Oxley, Jon ; Pan, Chin Chen ; Samaratunga, Hemamali ; Srigley, John R. ; Takahashi, Hiroyuki ; True, Lawrence D. ; Tsuzuki, Toyonori ; van der Kwast, Theo ; Varma, Murali ; Zhou, Ming ; Clements, Mark. / Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading. In: Histopathology. 2018.
@article{4df5c42ae2424e558fb31dd352df695d,
title = "Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading",
abstract = "Aims: Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading. Methods and results: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95{\%} confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.",
keywords = "Database, Grading, International Society of Urological Pathology, Prostate, Standardisation",
author = "Lars Egevad and Brett Delahunt and Berney, {Daniel M.} and Bostwick, {David G.} and John Cheville and Eva Comperat and Evans, {Andrew J.} and Fine, {Samson W.} and Grignon, {David J.} and Humphrey, {Peter A.} and Jonas H{\"o}rnblad and Iczkowski, {Kenneth A.} and Kench, {James G.} and Glen Kristiansen and Leite, {Katia R.M.} and Cristina Magi-Galluzzi and Mckenney, {Jesse K.} and Jon Oxley and Pan, {Chin Chen} and Hemamali Samaratunga and Srigley, {John R.} and Hiroyuki Takahashi and True, {Lawrence D.} and Toyonori Tsuzuki and {van der Kwast}, Theo and Murali Varma and Ming Zhou and Mark Clements",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/his.13471",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Histopathology",
issn = "0309-0167",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading

AU - Egevad, Lars

AU - Delahunt, Brett

AU - Berney, Daniel M.

AU - Bostwick, David G.

AU - Cheville, John

AU - Comperat, Eva

AU - Evans, Andrew J.

AU - Fine, Samson W.

AU - Grignon, David J.

AU - Humphrey, Peter A.

AU - Hörnblad, Jonas

AU - Iczkowski, Kenneth A.

AU - Kench, James G.

AU - Kristiansen, Glen

AU - Leite, Katia R.M.

AU - Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina

AU - Mckenney, Jesse K.

AU - Oxley, Jon

AU - Pan, Chin Chen

AU - Samaratunga, Hemamali

AU - Srigley, John R.

AU - Takahashi, Hiroyuki

AU - True, Lawrence D.

AU - Tsuzuki, Toyonori

AU - van der Kwast, Theo

AU - Varma, Murali

AU - Zhou, Ming

AU - Clements, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Aims: Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading. Methods and results: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.

AB - Aims: Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading. Methods and results: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.

KW - Database

KW - Grading

KW - International Society of Urological Pathology

KW - Prostate

KW - Standardisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043289970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043289970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/his.13471

DO - 10.1111/his.13471

M3 - Article

C2 - 29359484

AN - SCOPUS:85043289970

JO - Histopathology

JF - Histopathology

SN - 0309-0167

ER -