TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection
T2 - Appraisal of the state-of-the-science
AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas
AU - Sherman, Mark E.
AU - Schiffman, Mark
AU - Wang, Sophia S.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - Objective: We wanted to identify the most promising methylation marker candidates for cervical cancer early detection. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in Medline and weighted average frequencies for methylated genes stratified by tissue source and methods used were computed. Results: 51 studies were identified analyzing 68 different genes for methylation in 4376 specimens across all stages of cervical carcinogenesis. 15 genes, DAPK1, RASSF1, CDH1, CDKN2A, MGMT, RARB, APC, FHIT, MLH1, TIMP3, GSTP1, CADM1, CDH13, HIC1, and TERT have been analyzed in 5 or more studies. The published data on these genes is highly heterogeneous; 7 genes (CDH1, FHIT, TERT, CDH13, MGMT, TIMP3, and HIC1) had a reported range of methylation frequencies in cervical cancers of greater than 60% between studies. Stratification by analysis method did not resolve the heterogeneity. Three markers, DAPK1, CADM1, and RARB, showed elevated methylation in cervical cancers consistently across studies. Conclusions: There is currently no methylation marker that can be readily translated for use in cervical cancer screening or triage settings. Large, well-conducted methylation profiling studies of cervical carcinogenesis could yield new candidates that are more specific for HPV-related carcinogenesis. New candidate markers need to be thoroughly validated in highly standardized assays.
AB - Objective: We wanted to identify the most promising methylation marker candidates for cervical cancer early detection. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in Medline and weighted average frequencies for methylated genes stratified by tissue source and methods used were computed. Results: 51 studies were identified analyzing 68 different genes for methylation in 4376 specimens across all stages of cervical carcinogenesis. 15 genes, DAPK1, RASSF1, CDH1, CDKN2A, MGMT, RARB, APC, FHIT, MLH1, TIMP3, GSTP1, CADM1, CDH13, HIC1, and TERT have been analyzed in 5 or more studies. The published data on these genes is highly heterogeneous; 7 genes (CDH1, FHIT, TERT, CDH13, MGMT, TIMP3, and HIC1) had a reported range of methylation frequencies in cervical cancers of greater than 60% between studies. Stratification by analysis method did not resolve the heterogeneity. Three markers, DAPK1, CADM1, and RARB, showed elevated methylation in cervical cancers consistently across studies. Conclusions: There is currently no methylation marker that can be readily translated for use in cervical cancer screening or triage settings. Large, well-conducted methylation profiling studies of cervical carcinogenesis could yield new candidates that are more specific for HPV-related carcinogenesis. New candidate markers need to be thoroughly validated in highly standardized assays.
KW - Biomarker
KW - CIN
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - HPV
KW - Methylation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249144847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58249144847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.012
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19054549
AN - SCOPUS:58249144847
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 112
SP - 293
EP - 299
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 2
ER -