Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management

Terrence L. Trentman, Peter E. Frasco, Leslie N. Milde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective To determine whether postoperative "difficult airway" letters, which inform a patient that he has a difficult airway, are an effective way to communicate with patients and future caregivers. Design Patient telephone survey. Setting Tertiary referral and postgraduate teaching hospital. Patients 113 (of a total of 142) patients who were mailed a postoperative "difficult airway" letter during the time period 2000-2002, and who agreed to participate in the survey. Interventions and measurements The patients who participated in the study were asked a series of questions regarding their difficult airway history, including whether or not their primary care provider was aware of their condition, whether or not the patient had obtained a MedicAlert® bracelet or necklace as recommended, whether or not they had undergone subsequent surgery, and if so had they conveyed their difficult airway history to their surgeon or anesthesiologist. Main results Of the 142 patients who were sent letters, 113 agreed to participate. Of those who did not, two patients who were contacted refused to participate. Twenty-three patients could not be contacted following several attempts, and four patients had died. Twenty-eight patients (20%) stated they could not remember receiving a letter. Forty-six (41%) stated that they had informed their primary care provider about their difficult airway. Twenty-two of 24 patients (92%) who had undergone subsequent surgery indicated they had informed their anesthesiologist about their airway. Twenty-six patients (23%) had registered with the MedicAlert Foundation. As a result of the survey, 44 patients requested more information about their airway and MedicAlert®. Conclusions The majority of patients who were sent a "difficult airway" letter did not obtain a MedicAlert® bracelet, although frequently recommended. However, most of the patients who subsequently had surgery informed their anesthesiologist or surgeon of their airway history. "Difficult airway" letters may have significant utility even if patients do not obtain identifying jewelry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-261
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Airway Management
History
Primary Health Care
Jewelry

Keywords

  • Airway
  • difficult intubation
  • general endotracheal intubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management. / Trentman, Terrence L.; Frasco, Peter E.; Milde, Leslie N.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 16, No. 4, 06.2004, p. 257-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trentman, Terrence L. ; Frasco, Peter E. ; Milde, Leslie N. / Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management. In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 257-261.
@article{297195043ec04aa89719a09eb0681ef9,
title = "Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management",
abstract = "Study objective To determine whether postoperative {"}difficult airway{"} letters, which inform a patient that he has a difficult airway, are an effective way to communicate with patients and future caregivers. Design Patient telephone survey. Setting Tertiary referral and postgraduate teaching hospital. Patients 113 (of a total of 142) patients who were mailed a postoperative {"}difficult airway{"} letter during the time period 2000-2002, and who agreed to participate in the survey. Interventions and measurements The patients who participated in the study were asked a series of questions regarding their difficult airway history, including whether or not their primary care provider was aware of their condition, whether or not the patient had obtained a MedicAlert{\circledR} bracelet or necklace as recommended, whether or not they had undergone subsequent surgery, and if so had they conveyed their difficult airway history to their surgeon or anesthesiologist. Main results Of the 142 patients who were sent letters, 113 agreed to participate. Of those who did not, two patients who were contacted refused to participate. Twenty-three patients could not be contacted following several attempts, and four patients had died. Twenty-eight patients (20{\%}) stated they could not remember receiving a letter. Forty-six (41{\%}) stated that they had informed their primary care provider about their difficult airway. Twenty-two of 24 patients (92{\%}) who had undergone subsequent surgery indicated they had informed their anesthesiologist about their airway. Twenty-six patients (23{\%}) had registered with the MedicAlert Foundation. As a result of the survey, 44 patients requested more information about their airway and MedicAlert{\circledR}. Conclusions The majority of patients who were sent a {"}difficult airway{"} letter did not obtain a MedicAlert{\circledR} bracelet, although frequently recommended. However, most of the patients who subsequently had surgery informed their anesthesiologist or surgeon of their airway history. {"}Difficult airway{"} letters may have significant utility even if patients do not obtain identifying jewelry.",
keywords = "Airway, difficult intubation, general endotracheal intubation",
author = "Trentman, {Terrence L.} and Frasco, {Peter E.} and Milde, {Leslie N.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "257--261",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of letters sent to patients after difficult airway management

AU - Trentman, Terrence L.

AU - Frasco, Peter E.

AU - Milde, Leslie N.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Study objective To determine whether postoperative "difficult airway" letters, which inform a patient that he has a difficult airway, are an effective way to communicate with patients and future caregivers. Design Patient telephone survey. Setting Tertiary referral and postgraduate teaching hospital. Patients 113 (of a total of 142) patients who were mailed a postoperative "difficult airway" letter during the time period 2000-2002, and who agreed to participate in the survey. Interventions and measurements The patients who participated in the study were asked a series of questions regarding their difficult airway history, including whether or not their primary care provider was aware of their condition, whether or not the patient had obtained a MedicAlert® bracelet or necklace as recommended, whether or not they had undergone subsequent surgery, and if so had they conveyed their difficult airway history to their surgeon or anesthesiologist. Main results Of the 142 patients who were sent letters, 113 agreed to participate. Of those who did not, two patients who were contacted refused to participate. Twenty-three patients could not be contacted following several attempts, and four patients had died. Twenty-eight patients (20%) stated they could not remember receiving a letter. Forty-six (41%) stated that they had informed their primary care provider about their difficult airway. Twenty-two of 24 patients (92%) who had undergone subsequent surgery indicated they had informed their anesthesiologist about their airway. Twenty-six patients (23%) had registered with the MedicAlert Foundation. As a result of the survey, 44 patients requested more information about their airway and MedicAlert®. Conclusions The majority of patients who were sent a "difficult airway" letter did not obtain a MedicAlert® bracelet, although frequently recommended. However, most of the patients who subsequently had surgery informed their anesthesiologist or surgeon of their airway history. "Difficult airway" letters may have significant utility even if patients do not obtain identifying jewelry.

AB - Study objective To determine whether postoperative "difficult airway" letters, which inform a patient that he has a difficult airway, are an effective way to communicate with patients and future caregivers. Design Patient telephone survey. Setting Tertiary referral and postgraduate teaching hospital. Patients 113 (of a total of 142) patients who were mailed a postoperative "difficult airway" letter during the time period 2000-2002, and who agreed to participate in the survey. Interventions and measurements The patients who participated in the study were asked a series of questions regarding their difficult airway history, including whether or not their primary care provider was aware of their condition, whether or not the patient had obtained a MedicAlert® bracelet or necklace as recommended, whether or not they had undergone subsequent surgery, and if so had they conveyed their difficult airway history to their surgeon or anesthesiologist. Main results Of the 142 patients who were sent letters, 113 agreed to participate. Of those who did not, two patients who were contacted refused to participate. Twenty-three patients could not be contacted following several attempts, and four patients had died. Twenty-eight patients (20%) stated they could not remember receiving a letter. Forty-six (41%) stated that they had informed their primary care provider about their difficult airway. Twenty-two of 24 patients (92%) who had undergone subsequent surgery indicated they had informed their anesthesiologist about their airway. Twenty-six patients (23%) had registered with the MedicAlert Foundation. As a result of the survey, 44 patients requested more information about their airway and MedicAlert®. Conclusions The majority of patients who were sent a "difficult airway" letter did not obtain a MedicAlert® bracelet, although frequently recommended. However, most of the patients who subsequently had surgery informed their anesthesiologist or surgeon of their airway history. "Difficult airway" letters may have significant utility even if patients do not obtain identifying jewelry.

KW - Airway

KW - difficult intubation

KW - general endotracheal intubation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142663118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142663118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 257

EP - 261

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 4

ER -