TY - JOUR
T1 - Using the Merlin assay for reducing sentinel lymph node biopsy complications in melanoma
T2 - a retrospective cohort study
AU - Hieken, Tina J.
AU - Sadurní, Mariana B.
AU - Quattrocchi, Enrica
AU - Kobic, Ajdin
AU - Sominidi-Damodaran, Sindhuja
AU - Dwarkasing, Jvalini T.
AU - Meerstein-Kessel, Lisette
AU - Bridges, Alina G.
AU - Meves, Alexander
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest: Dr. Hieken received research funding from Genentech and SkylineDx (both to Mayo Clinic). Dr. Meves received research funding from SkylineDx and has a financial interest in the Merlin assay. Dr. Dwarkasing and Dr. Meerstein‐Kessel are employees of SkylineDx BV and hold stock options. All remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Information:
Funding source: National Cancer Institute (grant K08 CA215105 to A.M.); Melanoma Research Alliance (award 652760 to EQ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the International Society of Dermatology.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: The assessment of the sentinel lymph node is a cornerstone of melanoma staging. However, ~80% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) are negative and nontherapeutic, and patients are unnecessarily exposed to surgery-related complications. Here, we gauged the potential of the Merlin assay to reduce SLNB-associated complications. The Merlin assay uses clinicopathologic variables and tumor gene expression profiling to identify low-risk patients who may forgo SLNB. Methods: We utilized the Merlin test development cohort to determine SLNB complication rates for procedures performed between 2004 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Complications evaluated were lymphedema, seroma, infection/cellulitis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Patients who underwent a completion lymph node dissection were excluded. Results: A total of 558 patients were included. The overall 90-day complication rate specific to SLNB (1 year for lymphedema) was 17.4%. The most common complications were seroma (9.3%), infection/cellulitis (4.8%), and lymphedema (4.3%). All three were more common in patients with a lower extremity primary tumor location versus other locations. With Merlin test results applied, SLNB-related complications would have decreased by 59%. Conclusion: SLNB is a safe procedure but carries a significant complication rate. Merlin testing might reduce the need for SLNB and its associated complications.
AB - Background: The assessment of the sentinel lymph node is a cornerstone of melanoma staging. However, ~80% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) are negative and nontherapeutic, and patients are unnecessarily exposed to surgery-related complications. Here, we gauged the potential of the Merlin assay to reduce SLNB-associated complications. The Merlin assay uses clinicopathologic variables and tumor gene expression profiling to identify low-risk patients who may forgo SLNB. Methods: We utilized the Merlin test development cohort to determine SLNB complication rates for procedures performed between 2004 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Complications evaluated were lymphedema, seroma, infection/cellulitis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Patients who underwent a completion lymph node dissection were excluded. Results: A total of 558 patients were included. The overall 90-day complication rate specific to SLNB (1 year for lymphedema) was 17.4%. The most common complications were seroma (9.3%), infection/cellulitis (4.8%), and lymphedema (4.3%). All three were more common in patients with a lower extremity primary tumor location versus other locations. With Merlin test results applied, SLNB-related complications would have decreased by 59%. Conclusion: SLNB is a safe procedure but carries a significant complication rate. Merlin testing might reduce the need for SLNB and its associated complications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124170705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124170705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijd.16056
DO - 10.1111/ijd.16056
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 35100440
AN - SCOPUS:85124170705
SN - 0011-9059
VL - 61
SP - 848
EP - 854
JO - International Journal of Dermatology
JF - International Journal of Dermatology
IS - 7
ER -