Using the absolute neutrophil count as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic

an abbreviated test can be preferable.

Aminah Jatoi, R. Jaromin, L. Jennings, P. L. Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

More is not always better. We hypothesized that clinicians prefer an abbreviated but focused test to one that provides more--but not totally essential--information. We performed a retrospective analysis of physicians' ordering practices after introducing the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic. Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between the ANC, as determined by the Coulter STKS instrument, and the manual neutrophil count. In contrast to the more extensive five-part differential the ANC is a one-part differential that focuses exclusively on the neutrophil count and provides abbreviated information. The hematology laboratory's records from 2 months before and 4 months after introducing this new test were analyzed. Total numbers of ANCs, automated complete differentials, and manual complete differentials performed were tabulated. After its introduction, the ANC comprised more than 75% of differentials performed in this clinic. Manual complete differentials dropped from 69.4% to 18.8%. The turnaround time (TAT) for all differentials taken together dropped by 75% (p = 0.042). We conclude that the ANC can be used widely in the hematology/oncology clinic as a separate, stand-alone test. For clinicians, its popularity over the five-part differential may be based on the fact that the ANC is a focused test with a relatively short TAT. Our experience suggests that it is the test result's relevance and not the volume of information provided that determines clinicians' use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-260
Number of pages5
JournalClinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association / CLMA
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hematology
Neutrophils
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

@article{a347b476556f4a97b4c9bb4d5cd4669e,
title = "Using the absolute neutrophil count as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic: an abbreviated test can be preferable.",
abstract = "More is not always better. We hypothesized that clinicians prefer an abbreviated but focused test to one that provides more--but not totally essential--information. We performed a retrospective analysis of physicians' ordering practices after introducing the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic. Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between the ANC, as determined by the Coulter STKS instrument, and the manual neutrophil count. In contrast to the more extensive five-part differential the ANC is a one-part differential that focuses exclusively on the neutrophil count and provides abbreviated information. The hematology laboratory's records from 2 months before and 4 months after introducing this new test were analyzed. Total numbers of ANCs, automated complete differentials, and manual complete differentials performed were tabulated. After its introduction, the ANC comprised more than 75{\%} of differentials performed in this clinic. Manual complete differentials dropped from 69.4{\%} to 18.8{\%}. The turnaround time (TAT) for all differentials taken together dropped by 75{\%} (p = 0.042). We conclude that the ANC can be used widely in the hematology/oncology clinic as a separate, stand-alone test. For clinicians, its popularity over the five-part differential may be based on the fact that the ANC is a focused test with a relatively short TAT. Our experience suggests that it is the test result's relevance and not the volume of information provided that determines clinicians' use.",
author = "Aminah Jatoi and R. Jaromin and L. Jennings and Nguyen, {P. L.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "256--260",
journal = "Clinical Laboratory Management Review",
issn = "0888-7950",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the absolute neutrophil count as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic

T2 - an abbreviated test can be preferable.

AU - Jatoi, Aminah

AU - Jaromin, R.

AU - Jennings, L.

AU - Nguyen, P. L.

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - More is not always better. We hypothesized that clinicians prefer an abbreviated but focused test to one that provides more--but not totally essential--information. We performed a retrospective analysis of physicians' ordering practices after introducing the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic. Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between the ANC, as determined by the Coulter STKS instrument, and the manual neutrophil count. In contrast to the more extensive five-part differential the ANC is a one-part differential that focuses exclusively on the neutrophil count and provides abbreviated information. The hematology laboratory's records from 2 months before and 4 months after introducing this new test were analyzed. Total numbers of ANCs, automated complete differentials, and manual complete differentials performed were tabulated. After its introduction, the ANC comprised more than 75% of differentials performed in this clinic. Manual complete differentials dropped from 69.4% to 18.8%. The turnaround time (TAT) for all differentials taken together dropped by 75% (p = 0.042). We conclude that the ANC can be used widely in the hematology/oncology clinic as a separate, stand-alone test. For clinicians, its popularity over the five-part differential may be based on the fact that the ANC is a focused test with a relatively short TAT. Our experience suggests that it is the test result's relevance and not the volume of information provided that determines clinicians' use.

AB - More is not always better. We hypothesized that clinicians prefer an abbreviated but focused test to one that provides more--but not totally essential--information. We performed a retrospective analysis of physicians' ordering practices after introducing the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic. Previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between the ANC, as determined by the Coulter STKS instrument, and the manual neutrophil count. In contrast to the more extensive five-part differential the ANC is a one-part differential that focuses exclusively on the neutrophil count and provides abbreviated information. The hematology laboratory's records from 2 months before and 4 months after introducing this new test were analyzed. Total numbers of ANCs, automated complete differentials, and manual complete differentials performed were tabulated. After its introduction, the ANC comprised more than 75% of differentials performed in this clinic. Manual complete differentials dropped from 69.4% to 18.8%. The turnaround time (TAT) for all differentials taken together dropped by 75% (p = 0.042). We conclude that the ANC can be used widely in the hematology/oncology clinic as a separate, stand-alone test. For clinicians, its popularity over the five-part differential may be based on the fact that the ANC is a focused test with a relatively short TAT. Our experience suggests that it is the test result's relevance and not the volume of information provided that determines clinicians' use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032115912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032115912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 256

EP - 260

JO - Clinical Laboratory Management Review

JF - Clinical Laboratory Management Review

SN - 0888-7950

IS - 4

ER -