Abstract
Background Response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is associated with clinical and transdiagnostic genetic factors. The predictive combination of these variables might help clinicians better predict which patients will respond to lithium treatment. Aims To use a combination of transdiagnostic genetic and clinical factors to predict lithium response in patients with bipolar disorder. Method This study utilised genetic and clinical data (n = 1034) collected as part of the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen) project. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were computed for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, and then combined with clinical variables using a cross-validated machine-learning regression approach. Unimodal, multimodal and genetically stratified models were trained and validated using ridge, elastic net and random forest regression on 692 patients with bipolar disorder from ten study sites using leave-site-out cross-validation. All models were then tested on an independent test set of 342 patients. The best performing models were then tested in a classification framework. Results The best performing linear model explained 5.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response and was composed of clinical variables, PRS variables and interaction terms between them. The best performing non-linear model used only clinical variables and explained 8.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response. A priori genomic stratification improved non-linear model performance to 13.7% (P = 0.0001) and improved the binary classification of lithium response. This model stratified patients based on their meta-polygenic loadings for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia and was then trained using clinical data. Conclusions Using PRS to first stratify patients genetically and then train machine-learning models with clinical predictors led to large improvements in lithium response prediction. When used with other PRS and biological markers in the future this approach may help inform which patients are most likely to respond to lithium treatment.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 219-228 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | British Journal of Psychiatry |
Volume | 220 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 9 2022 |
Keywords
- Mood stabilisers
- bipolar affective disorders
- depressive disorders
- genetics
- outcome studies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using polygenic scores and clinical data for bipolar disorder patient stratification and lithium response prediction: machine learning approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Using polygenic scores and clinical data for bipolar disorder patient stratification and lithium response prediction : machine learning approach. / Cearns, Micah; Amare, Azmeraw T.; Schubert, Klaus Oliver et al.
In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 220, No. 4, 09.04.2022, p. 219-228.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Using polygenic scores and clinical data for bipolar disorder patient stratification and lithium response prediction
T2 - machine learning approach
AU - Cearns, Micah
AU - Amare, Azmeraw T.
AU - Schubert, Klaus Oliver
AU - Thalamuthu, Anbupalam
AU - Frank, Joseph
AU - Streit, Fabian
AU - Adli, Mazda
AU - Akula, Nirmala
AU - Akiyama, Kazufumi
AU - Ardau, Raffaella
AU - Arias, Bárbara
AU - Aubry, Jean Michel
AU - Backlund, Lena
AU - Bhattacharjee, Abesh Kumar
AU - Bellivier, Frank
AU - Benabarre, Antonio
AU - Bengesser, Susanne
AU - Biernacka, Joanna M.
AU - Birner, Armin
AU - Brichant-Petitjean, Clara
AU - Cervantes, Pablo
AU - Chen, Hsi Chung
AU - Chillotti, Caterina
AU - Cichon, Sven
AU - Cruceanu, Cristiana
AU - Czerski, Piotr M.
AU - Dalkner, Nina
AU - Dayer, Alexandre
AU - Degenhardt, Franziska
AU - Zompo, Maria Del
AU - Depaulo, J. Raymond
AU - Étain, Bruno
AU - Falkai, Peter
AU - Forstner, Andreas J.
AU - Frisen, Louise
AU - Frye, Mark A.
AU - Fullerton, Janice M.
AU - Gard, Sébastien
AU - Garnham, Julie S.
AU - Goes, Fernando S.
AU - Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria
AU - Grof, Paul
AU - Hashimoto, Ryota
AU - Hauser, Joanna
AU - Heilbronner, Urs
AU - Herms, Stefan
AU - Hoffmann, Per
AU - Hofmann, Andrea
AU - Hou, Liping
AU - Hsu, Yi Hsiang
AU - Jamain, Stephane
AU - Jiménez, Esther
AU - Kahn, Jean Pierre
AU - Kassem, Layla
AU - Kuo, Po Hsiu
AU - Kato, Tadafumi
AU - Kelsoe, John
AU - Kittel-Schneider, Sarah
AU - Kliwicki, Sebastian
AU - König, Barbara
AU - Kusumi, Ichiro
AU - Laje, Gonzalo
AU - Landén, Mikael
AU - Lavebratt, Catharina
AU - Leboyer, Marion
AU - Leckband, Susan G.
AU - Maj, Mario
AU - Manchia, Mirko
AU - Martinsson, Lina
AU - McCarthy, Michael J.
AU - McElroy, Susan
AU - Colom, Francesc
AU - Mitjans, Marina
AU - Mondimore, Francis M.
AU - Monteleone, Palmiero
AU - Nievergelt, Caroline M.
AU - Nöthen, Markus M.
AU - Novák, Tomas
AU - O'Donovan, Claire
AU - Ozaki, Norio
AU - Millischer, Vincent
AU - Papiol, Sergi
AU - Pfennig, Andrea
AU - Pisanu, Claudia
AU - Potash, James B.
AU - Reif, Andreas
AU - Reininghaus, Eva
AU - Rouleau, Guy A.
AU - Rybakowski, Janusz K.
AU - Schalling, Martin
AU - Schofield, Peter R.
AU - Schweizer, Barbara W.
AU - Severino, Giovanni
AU - Shekhtman, Tatyana
AU - Shilling, Paul D.
AU - Shimoda, Katzutaka
AU - Simhandl, Christian
AU - Slaney, Claire M.
AU - Squassina, Alessio
AU - Stamm, Thomas
AU - Stopkova, Pavla
AU - Tekola-Ayele, Fasil
AU - Tortorella, Alfonso
AU - Turecki, Gustavo
AU - Veeh, Julia
AU - Vieta, Eduard
AU - Witt, Stephanie H.
AU - Roberts, Gloria
AU - Zandi, Peter P.
AU - Alda, Martin
AU - Bauer, Michael
AU - McMahon, Francis J.
AU - Mitchell, Philip B.
AU - Schulze, Thomas G.
AU - Rietschel, Marcella
AU - Clark, Scott R.
AU - Baune, Bernhard T.
N1 - Funding Information: The primary sources of funding were grants RI 908/7-1, FOR2107 and RI 908/11-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Marcella Rietschel) and grant NO 246/10-1 (Markus M. Nöthen) and grant ZIA-MH00284311 from the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00001174). The genotyping was funded in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the Integrated Network IntegraMent (Integrated Understanding of Causes and Mechanisms in Mental Disorders), under the auspices of the e:Med Programme (Thomas G. Schulze, Marcella Rietschel and Markus M. Nöthen). This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants P50CA89392 from the National Cancer Institute and 5K02DA021237 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. The Canadian part of the study was supported by grant 64410 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Martin Alda). Collection and phenotyping of the Australian University of New South Wales sample was funded by program grant 1037196 from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Philip B. Mitchell, Peter R. Schofield, Janice M. Fullerton). The collection of the Barcelona sample was supported by grants PI080247, PI1200906, PI12/00018, 2014SGR1636, 2014SGR398, and MSII14/00030 from the Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, the Centres de Recerca de Catalunya Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and the Miguel Servet II and Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The Swedish Research Council, the Stockholm County Council, Karolinska Institutet and the Söderström-Königska Foundation supported this research through grants awarded to Lena Backlund, Louise Frisen, Catharina Lavebratt and Martin Schalling. The collection of the Geneva sample was supported by grants Synapsy–The Synaptic Basis of Mental Diseases 51NF40-158776 and 32003B-125469 from the Swiss National Foundation. The work by the French group was supported by INSERM (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), the Fondation FondaMental (RTRS Santé Mentale), and the labex Bio-PSY (Investissements d'Avenir program managed by the ANR under reference ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02). The collection of the Romanian sample was supported by a grant from Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu). The collection of the Czech sample was supported by the project Nr. LO1611 with a financial support from the MEYS under the NPU I program and by the Czech Science Foundation, grant Nr. 17-07070S. Azmeraw T. Amare is supported by 2019–2021 National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behaviour Research Foundation (BBRF) and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant 2021 – 2008000 Funding Information: Eduard Vieta has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: AB-Biotics, Allergan, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Farmindustria, Ferrer, Forest Research Institute, Gedeon Richter, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, the Brain and Behaviour Foundation, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM), and the Stanley Medical Research Institute. Michael Bauer has received grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), and Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: Allergan, Aristo, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, neuraxpharm, Otsuka, Sandoz, Servier and Sunovion outside the submitted work. Sarah Kittel-Schneider has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or speaker for the following entities: Medice Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH and Shire. Bernhard Baune has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Servier, the National Health and Medical Research Council, the Fay Fuller Foundation, the James and Diana Ramsay Foundation. Tadafumi Kato received honoraria for lectures, manuscripts, and/or consultancy, from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co, Ltd, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co, Ltd, Meiji Seika Pharma Co, Ltd, Pfizer Japan Inc., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Janssen Asia Pacific, Yoshitomiyakuhin, Astellas Pharma Inc, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Wiley Publishing Japan, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co Ltd, Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, MSD K.K., Kyowa Pharmaceutical Industry Co, Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Tadafumi Kato also received a research grant from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Peter Falkai has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Essex, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Gedeon Richter, Servier and Takeda as well as the German Ministry of Science and the German Ministry of Health. Eva Reininghaus has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: Janssen and Institut Allergosan. Mikael Landén declares that, over the past 36 months, he has received lecture honoraria from Lundbeck and served as scientific consultant for EPID Research Oy; no other equity ownership, profit-sharing agreements, royalties or patent. Kazufumi Akiyama has received consulting honoraria from Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd The other authors have no other conflict of interest to disclose. Funding Information: The primary sources of funding were grants RI 908/7-1, FOR2107 and RI 908/11-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Marcella Rietschel) and grant NO 246/10-1 (Markus M. N then) and grant ZIA-MH00284311 from the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00001174). The genotyping was funded in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the Integrated Network IntegraMent (Integrated Understanding of Causes and Mechanisms in Mental Disorders), under the auspices of the e:Med Programme (Thomas G. Schulze, Marcella Rietschel and Markus M. N then). This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants P50CA89392 from the National Cancer Institute and 5K02DA021237 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. The Canadian part of the study was supported by grant 64410 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Martin Alda). Collection and phenotyping of the Australian University of New South Wales sample was funded by program grant 1037196 from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Philip B. Mitchell, Peter R. Schofield, Janice M. Fullerton). The collection of the Barcelona sample was supported by grants PI080247, PI1200906, PI12/00018, 2014SGR1636, 2014SGR398, and MSII14/00030 from the Centro de Investigaci n en Red de Salud Mental, Institut d'Investigacions Biom diques August Pi i Sunyer, the Centres de Recerca de Catalunya Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and the Miguel Servet II and Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The Swedish Research Council, the Stockholm County Council, Karolinska Institutet and the S derstr m-K nigska Foundation supported this research through grants awarded to Lena Backlund, Louise Frisen, Catharina Lavebratt and Martin Schalling. The collection of the Geneva sample was supported by grants Synapsy The Synaptic Basis of Mental Diseases 51NF40-158776 and 32003B-125469 from the Swiss National Foundation. The work by the French group was supported by INSERM (Institut National de la Sant et de la Recherche M dicale), AP-HP (Assistance Publique des H pitaux de Paris), the Fondation FondaMental (RTRS Sant Mentale), and the labex Bio-PSY (Investissements d'Avenir program managed by the ANR under reference ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02). The collection of the Romanian sample was supported by a grant from Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu). The collection of the Czech sample was supported by the project Nr. LO1611 with a financial support from the MEYS under the NPU I program and by the Czech Science Foundation, grant Nr. 17-07070S. Azmeraw T. Amare is supported by 2019 2021 National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behaviour Research Foundation (BBRF) and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant 2021 2008000 Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
PY - 2022/4/9
Y1 - 2022/4/9
N2 - Background Response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is associated with clinical and transdiagnostic genetic factors. The predictive combination of these variables might help clinicians better predict which patients will respond to lithium treatment. Aims To use a combination of transdiagnostic genetic and clinical factors to predict lithium response in patients with bipolar disorder. Method This study utilised genetic and clinical data (n = 1034) collected as part of the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen) project. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were computed for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, and then combined with clinical variables using a cross-validated machine-learning regression approach. Unimodal, multimodal and genetically stratified models were trained and validated using ridge, elastic net and random forest regression on 692 patients with bipolar disorder from ten study sites using leave-site-out cross-validation. All models were then tested on an independent test set of 342 patients. The best performing models were then tested in a classification framework. Results The best performing linear model explained 5.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response and was composed of clinical variables, PRS variables and interaction terms between them. The best performing non-linear model used only clinical variables and explained 8.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response. A priori genomic stratification improved non-linear model performance to 13.7% (P = 0.0001) and improved the binary classification of lithium response. This model stratified patients based on their meta-polygenic loadings for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia and was then trained using clinical data. Conclusions Using PRS to first stratify patients genetically and then train machine-learning models with clinical predictors led to large improvements in lithium response prediction. When used with other PRS and biological markers in the future this approach may help inform which patients are most likely to respond to lithium treatment.
AB - Background Response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is associated with clinical and transdiagnostic genetic factors. The predictive combination of these variables might help clinicians better predict which patients will respond to lithium treatment. Aims To use a combination of transdiagnostic genetic and clinical factors to predict lithium response in patients with bipolar disorder. Method This study utilised genetic and clinical data (n = 1034) collected as part of the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen) project. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were computed for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, and then combined with clinical variables using a cross-validated machine-learning regression approach. Unimodal, multimodal and genetically stratified models were trained and validated using ridge, elastic net and random forest regression on 692 patients with bipolar disorder from ten study sites using leave-site-out cross-validation. All models were then tested on an independent test set of 342 patients. The best performing models were then tested in a classification framework. Results The best performing linear model explained 5.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response and was composed of clinical variables, PRS variables and interaction terms between them. The best performing non-linear model used only clinical variables and explained 8.1% (P = 0.0001) of variance in lithium response. A priori genomic stratification improved non-linear model performance to 13.7% (P = 0.0001) and improved the binary classification of lithium response. This model stratified patients based on their meta-polygenic loadings for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia and was then trained using clinical data. Conclusions Using PRS to first stratify patients genetically and then train machine-learning models with clinical predictors led to large improvements in lithium response prediction. When used with other PRS and biological markers in the future this approach may help inform which patients are most likely to respond to lithium treatment.
KW - Mood stabilisers
KW - bipolar affective disorders
KW - depressive disorders
KW - genetics
KW - outcome studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126276148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126276148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.2022.28
DO - 10.1192/bjp.2022.28
M3 - Article
C2 - 35225756
AN - SCOPUS:85126276148
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 220
SP - 219
EP - 228
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -