Using high-sensitivity troponin T: The importance of the proper gold standard

Miguel Santaló, Alfonso Martin, Joaquin Velilla, Juan Povar, Francisco Temboury, Jose Balaguer, Mar Muñoz, Pilar Calmarza, Carmen Ortiz, Arturo Carratalá, Ignacio Gich, Javier Mercé, Allan S Jaffe, Jordi Ordoñez-Llanos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to determine how best to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) to diagnose myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 358 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes sampled at admission and 2, 4, and 6 to 8 hours. Both contemporary cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and hscTnT were measured. Patients were classified with conventional cTnT values by independent investigators. Myocardial infarction required a cTnT value ≥99th reference percentile and a ≥20% change. Results: Seventy-nine patients had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105 patients had unstable angina, and 174 patients had nonacute coronary syndromes. A cTnT cutoff at the 10% coefficient of variation value missed 14.5% of infarctions. hscTnT had a sensitivity at admission of 89.9%, but specificity was only 75.1% because of elevations in 45.3% and 25.3% of those with unstable angina and nonacute coronary syndromes, respectively. The optimal value for myocardial infarction diagnosis with hscTnT was 25 ng/L at admission and 30 ng/L during serial sampling. All infarctions were diagnosed within 4 hours, with a time saving of 11 and 68 minutes compared with a cTnT value at the 99th reference percentile value and a cTnT value at a coefficient of variation of 10%. By using the 99th percentile of hsTnT plus a ≥20% change, 25 additional infarctions were identified. With these included, the optimal cutoff decreased to 12 ng/L at admission and 13 ng/L over time, but time to diagnosis increased. Conclusions: The gold standard used to diagnose myocardial infarction makes a major difference in the results. When myocardial infarction is diagnosed using hscTnT 99th percentile values with a 20% change, more are identified, diagnosis is delayed, and the optimal value for use is reduced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)709-717
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume126
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Troponin T
Myocardial Infarction
Infarction
Unstable Angina
Reference Values
Delayed Diagnosis
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • High-sensitivity troponin T
  • Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Santaló, M., Martin, A., Velilla, J., Povar, J., Temboury, F., Balaguer, J., ... Ordoñez-Llanos, J. (2013). Using high-sensitivity troponin T: The importance of the proper gold standard. American Journal of Medicine, 126(8), 709-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003

Using high-sensitivity troponin T : The importance of the proper gold standard. / Santaló, Miguel; Martin, Alfonso; Velilla, Joaquin; Povar, Juan; Temboury, Francisco; Balaguer, Jose; Muñoz, Mar; Calmarza, Pilar; Ortiz, Carmen; Carratalá, Arturo; Gich, Ignacio; Mercé, Javier; Jaffe, Allan S; Ordoñez-Llanos, Jordi.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 126, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 709-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Santaló, M, Martin, A, Velilla, J, Povar, J, Temboury, F, Balaguer, J, Muñoz, M, Calmarza, P, Ortiz, C, Carratalá, A, Gich, I, Mercé, J, Jaffe, AS & Ordoñez-Llanos, J 2013, 'Using high-sensitivity troponin T: The importance of the proper gold standard', American Journal of Medicine, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 709-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003
Santaló M, Martin A, Velilla J, Povar J, Temboury F, Balaguer J et al. Using high-sensitivity troponin T: The importance of the proper gold standard. American Journal of Medicine. 2013 Aug;126(8):709-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003
Santaló, Miguel ; Martin, Alfonso ; Velilla, Joaquin ; Povar, Juan ; Temboury, Francisco ; Balaguer, Jose ; Muñoz, Mar ; Calmarza, Pilar ; Ortiz, Carmen ; Carratalá, Arturo ; Gich, Ignacio ; Mercé, Javier ; Jaffe, Allan S ; Ordoñez-Llanos, Jordi. / Using high-sensitivity troponin T : The importance of the proper gold standard. In: American Journal of Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 126, No. 8. pp. 709-717.
@article{c6579c55c4064394ac3174c828c8260e,
title = "Using high-sensitivity troponin T: The importance of the proper gold standard",
abstract = "Objective: The study objective was to determine how best to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) to diagnose myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 358 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes sampled at admission and 2, 4, and 6 to 8 hours. Both contemporary cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and hscTnT were measured. Patients were classified with conventional cTnT values by independent investigators. Myocardial infarction required a cTnT value ≥99th reference percentile and a ≥20{\%} change. Results: Seventy-nine patients had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105 patients had unstable angina, and 174 patients had nonacute coronary syndromes. A cTnT cutoff at the 10{\%} coefficient of variation value missed 14.5{\%} of infarctions. hscTnT had a sensitivity at admission of 89.9{\%}, but specificity was only 75.1{\%} because of elevations in 45.3{\%} and 25.3{\%} of those with unstable angina and nonacute coronary syndromes, respectively. The optimal value for myocardial infarction diagnosis with hscTnT was 25 ng/L at admission and 30 ng/L during serial sampling. All infarctions were diagnosed within 4 hours, with a time saving of 11 and 68 minutes compared with a cTnT value at the 99th reference percentile value and a cTnT value at a coefficient of variation of 10{\%}. By using the 99th percentile of hsTnT plus a ≥20{\%} change, 25 additional infarctions were identified. With these included, the optimal cutoff decreased to 12 ng/L at admission and 13 ng/L over time, but time to diagnosis increased. Conclusions: The gold standard used to diagnose myocardial infarction makes a major difference in the results. When myocardial infarction is diagnosed using hscTnT 99th percentile values with a 20{\%} change, more are identified, diagnosis is delayed, and the optimal value for use is reduced.",
keywords = "High-sensitivity troponin T, Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction",
author = "Miguel Santal{\'o} and Alfonso Martin and Joaquin Velilla and Juan Povar and Francisco Temboury and Jose Balaguer and Mar Mu{\~n}oz and Pilar Calmarza and Carmen Ortiz and Arturo Carratal{\'a} and Ignacio Gich and Javier Merc{\'e} and Jaffe, {Allan S} and Jordi Ordo{\~n}ez-Llanos",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "709--717",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using high-sensitivity troponin T

T2 - The importance of the proper gold standard

AU - Santaló, Miguel

AU - Martin, Alfonso

AU - Velilla, Joaquin

AU - Povar, Juan

AU - Temboury, Francisco

AU - Balaguer, Jose

AU - Muñoz, Mar

AU - Calmarza, Pilar

AU - Ortiz, Carmen

AU - Carratalá, Arturo

AU - Gich, Ignacio

AU - Mercé, Javier

AU - Jaffe, Allan S

AU - Ordoñez-Llanos, Jordi

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Objective: The study objective was to determine how best to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) to diagnose myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 358 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes sampled at admission and 2, 4, and 6 to 8 hours. Both contemporary cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and hscTnT were measured. Patients were classified with conventional cTnT values by independent investigators. Myocardial infarction required a cTnT value ≥99th reference percentile and a ≥20% change. Results: Seventy-nine patients had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105 patients had unstable angina, and 174 patients had nonacute coronary syndromes. A cTnT cutoff at the 10% coefficient of variation value missed 14.5% of infarctions. hscTnT had a sensitivity at admission of 89.9%, but specificity was only 75.1% because of elevations in 45.3% and 25.3% of those with unstable angina and nonacute coronary syndromes, respectively. The optimal value for myocardial infarction diagnosis with hscTnT was 25 ng/L at admission and 30 ng/L during serial sampling. All infarctions were diagnosed within 4 hours, with a time saving of 11 and 68 minutes compared with a cTnT value at the 99th reference percentile value and a cTnT value at a coefficient of variation of 10%. By using the 99th percentile of hsTnT plus a ≥20% change, 25 additional infarctions were identified. With these included, the optimal cutoff decreased to 12 ng/L at admission and 13 ng/L over time, but time to diagnosis increased. Conclusions: The gold standard used to diagnose myocardial infarction makes a major difference in the results. When myocardial infarction is diagnosed using hscTnT 99th percentile values with a 20% change, more are identified, diagnosis is delayed, and the optimal value for use is reduced.

AB - Objective: The study objective was to determine how best to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) to diagnose myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 358 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes sampled at admission and 2, 4, and 6 to 8 hours. Both contemporary cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and hscTnT were measured. Patients were classified with conventional cTnT values by independent investigators. Myocardial infarction required a cTnT value ≥99th reference percentile and a ≥20% change. Results: Seventy-nine patients had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 105 patients had unstable angina, and 174 patients had nonacute coronary syndromes. A cTnT cutoff at the 10% coefficient of variation value missed 14.5% of infarctions. hscTnT had a sensitivity at admission of 89.9%, but specificity was only 75.1% because of elevations in 45.3% and 25.3% of those with unstable angina and nonacute coronary syndromes, respectively. The optimal value for myocardial infarction diagnosis with hscTnT was 25 ng/L at admission and 30 ng/L during serial sampling. All infarctions were diagnosed within 4 hours, with a time saving of 11 and 68 minutes compared with a cTnT value at the 99th reference percentile value and a cTnT value at a coefficient of variation of 10%. By using the 99th percentile of hsTnT plus a ≥20% change, 25 additional infarctions were identified. With these included, the optimal cutoff decreased to 12 ng/L at admission and 13 ng/L over time, but time to diagnosis increased. Conclusions: The gold standard used to diagnose myocardial infarction makes a major difference in the results. When myocardial infarction is diagnosed using hscTnT 99th percentile values with a 20% change, more are identified, diagnosis is delayed, and the optimal value for use is reduced.

KW - High-sensitivity troponin T

KW - Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880586708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880586708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 23764266

AN - SCOPUS:84880586708

VL - 126

SP - 709

EP - 717

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 8

ER -