Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery

Megan P. Johnson, Sharon J. Kim, Carrie L. Langstraat, Sneha Jain, Elizabeth B Habermann, Jean E. Wentink, Pamela L. Grubbs, Sharon A. Nehring, Amy L. Weaver, Michaela E. Mcgree, Robert R. Cima, Sean Christopher Dowdy, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether implementing a bundle, defined as a set of evidence-based practices performed collectively, can reduce 30-day surgical site infections. METHODS: Baseline surgical site infection rates were determined retrospectively for cases of open uterine cancer, ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and ovarian cancer with bowel resection between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at an academic center. A perioperative bundle was prospectively implemented during the intervention period (August 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014). Prior established elements were: patient education, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate shower before surgery, antibiotic administration, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol coverage of incisional area, and cefazolin redosing 3-4 hours after incision. New elements initiated were: sterile closing tray and staff glove change for fascia and skin closure, dressing removal at 24-48 hours, dismissal with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, and follow-up nursing phone call. Surgical site infection rates were examined using control charts, compared between periods using χ 2 or Fisher exact test, and validated against the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking. RESULTS: The overall 30-day surgical site infection rate was 38 of 635 (6.0%) among all cases in the preintervention period, with 11 superficial (1.7%), two deep (0.3%), and 25 organ or space infections (3.9%). In the intervention period, the overall rate was 2 of 190 (1.1%), with two organ or space infections (1.1%). Overall, the relative risk reduction in surgical site infection was 82.4% (P.01). The surgical site infection relative risk reduction was 77.6% among ovarian cancer with bowel resection, 79.3% among ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and 100% among uterine cancer. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking improved from the 10th decile to first decile; risk-adjusted odds ratio for surgical site infection decreased from 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6) to 0.6 (0.3-1.1). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an evidence-based surgical site infection reduction bundle was associated with substantial reductions in surgical site infection in high-risk cancer procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1135-1144
Number of pages10
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume127
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Neoplasms
Ovarian Neoplasms
Uterine Neoplasms
Risk Reduction Behavior
Quality Improvement
Cefazolin
2-Propanol
Evidence-Based Practice
Fascia
Patient Education
Bandages
Infection
Nursing
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery. / Johnson, Megan P.; Kim, Sharon J.; Langstraat, Carrie L.; Jain, Sneha; Habermann, Elizabeth B; Wentink, Jean E.; Grubbs, Pamela L.; Nehring, Sharon A.; Weaver, Amy L.; Mcgree, Michaela E.; Cima, Robert R.; Dowdy, Sean Christopher; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 127, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 1135-1144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, MP, Kim, SJ, Langstraat, CL, Jain, S, Habermann, EB, Wentink, JE, Grubbs, PL, Nehring, SA, Weaver, AL, Mcgree, ME, Cima, RR, Dowdy, SC & Bakkum-Gamez, JN 2016, 'Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1135-1144. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001449
Johnson, Megan P. ; Kim, Sharon J. ; Langstraat, Carrie L. ; Jain, Sneha ; Habermann, Elizabeth B ; Wentink, Jean E. ; Grubbs, Pamela L. ; Nehring, Sharon A. ; Weaver, Amy L. ; Mcgree, Michaela E. ; Cima, Robert R. ; Dowdy, Sean Christopher ; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N. / Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016 ; Vol. 127, No. 6. pp. 1135-1144.
@article{ef65396967444087bcf879d919de4f9e,
title = "Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether implementing a bundle, defined as a set of evidence-based practices performed collectively, can reduce 30-day surgical site infections. METHODS: Baseline surgical site infection rates were determined retrospectively for cases of open uterine cancer, ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and ovarian cancer with bowel resection between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at an academic center. A perioperative bundle was prospectively implemented during the intervention period (August 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014). Prior established elements were: patient education, 4{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate shower before surgery, antibiotic administration, 2{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate and 70{\%} isopropyl alcohol coverage of incisional area, and cefazolin redosing 3-4 hours after incision. New elements initiated were: sterile closing tray and staff glove change for fascia and skin closure, dressing removal at 24-48 hours, dismissal with 4{\%} chlorhexidine gluconate, and follow-up nursing phone call. Surgical site infection rates were examined using control charts, compared between periods using χ 2 or Fisher exact test, and validated against the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking. RESULTS: The overall 30-day surgical site infection rate was 38 of 635 (6.0{\%}) among all cases in the preintervention period, with 11 superficial (1.7{\%}), two deep (0.3{\%}), and 25 organ or space infections (3.9{\%}). In the intervention period, the overall rate was 2 of 190 (1.1{\%}), with two organ or space infections (1.1{\%}). Overall, the relative risk reduction in surgical site infection was 82.4{\%} (P.01). The surgical site infection relative risk reduction was 77.6{\%} among ovarian cancer with bowel resection, 79.3{\%} among ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and 100{\%} among uterine cancer. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking improved from the 10th decile to first decile; risk-adjusted odds ratio for surgical site infection decreased from 1.6 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.0-2.6) to 0.6 (0.3-1.1). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an evidence-based surgical site infection reduction bundle was associated with substantial reductions in surgical site infection in high-risk cancer procedures.",
author = "Johnson, {Megan P.} and Kim, {Sharon J.} and Langstraat, {Carrie L.} and Sneha Jain and Habermann, {Elizabeth B} and Wentink, {Jean E.} and Grubbs, {Pamela L.} and Nehring, {Sharon A.} and Weaver, {Amy L.} and Mcgree, {Michaela E.} and Cima, {Robert R.} and Dowdy, {Sean Christopher} and Bakkum-Gamez, {Jamie N}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000001449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "1135--1144",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection after major gynecologic cancer surgery

AU - Johnson, Megan P.

AU - Kim, Sharon J.

AU - Langstraat, Carrie L.

AU - Jain, Sneha

AU - Habermann, Elizabeth B

AU - Wentink, Jean E.

AU - Grubbs, Pamela L.

AU - Nehring, Sharon A.

AU - Weaver, Amy L.

AU - Mcgree, Michaela E.

AU - Cima, Robert R.

AU - Dowdy, Sean Christopher

AU - Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether implementing a bundle, defined as a set of evidence-based practices performed collectively, can reduce 30-day surgical site infections. METHODS: Baseline surgical site infection rates were determined retrospectively for cases of open uterine cancer, ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and ovarian cancer with bowel resection between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at an academic center. A perioperative bundle was prospectively implemented during the intervention period (August 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014). Prior established elements were: patient education, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate shower before surgery, antibiotic administration, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol coverage of incisional area, and cefazolin redosing 3-4 hours after incision. New elements initiated were: sterile closing tray and staff glove change for fascia and skin closure, dressing removal at 24-48 hours, dismissal with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, and follow-up nursing phone call. Surgical site infection rates were examined using control charts, compared between periods using χ 2 or Fisher exact test, and validated against the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking. RESULTS: The overall 30-day surgical site infection rate was 38 of 635 (6.0%) among all cases in the preintervention period, with 11 superficial (1.7%), two deep (0.3%), and 25 organ or space infections (3.9%). In the intervention period, the overall rate was 2 of 190 (1.1%), with two organ or space infections (1.1%). Overall, the relative risk reduction in surgical site infection was 82.4% (P.01). The surgical site infection relative risk reduction was 77.6% among ovarian cancer with bowel resection, 79.3% among ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and 100% among uterine cancer. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking improved from the 10th decile to first decile; risk-adjusted odds ratio for surgical site infection decreased from 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6) to 0.6 (0.3-1.1). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an evidence-based surgical site infection reduction bundle was associated with substantial reductions in surgical site infection in high-risk cancer procedures.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether implementing a bundle, defined as a set of evidence-based practices performed collectively, can reduce 30-day surgical site infections. METHODS: Baseline surgical site infection rates were determined retrospectively for cases of open uterine cancer, ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and ovarian cancer with bowel resection between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at an academic center. A perioperative bundle was prospectively implemented during the intervention period (August 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014). Prior established elements were: patient education, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate shower before surgery, antibiotic administration, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol coverage of incisional area, and cefazolin redosing 3-4 hours after incision. New elements initiated were: sterile closing tray and staff glove change for fascia and skin closure, dressing removal at 24-48 hours, dismissal with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, and follow-up nursing phone call. Surgical site infection rates were examined using control charts, compared between periods using χ 2 or Fisher exact test, and validated against the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking. RESULTS: The overall 30-day surgical site infection rate was 38 of 635 (6.0%) among all cases in the preintervention period, with 11 superficial (1.7%), two deep (0.3%), and 25 organ or space infections (3.9%). In the intervention period, the overall rate was 2 of 190 (1.1%), with two organ or space infections (1.1%). Overall, the relative risk reduction in surgical site infection was 82.4% (P.01). The surgical site infection relative risk reduction was 77.6% among ovarian cancer with bowel resection, 79.3% among ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and 100% among uterine cancer. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program decile ranking improved from the 10th decile to first decile; risk-adjusted odds ratio for surgical site infection decreased from 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6) to 0.6 (0.3-1.1). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an evidence-based surgical site infection reduction bundle was associated with substantial reductions in surgical site infection in high-risk cancer procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966326717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966326717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001449

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001449

M3 - Article

C2 - 27159744

AN - SCOPUS:84966326717

VL - 127

SP - 1135

EP - 1144

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 6

ER -