TY - JOUR
T1 - Usefulness of cardiac rehabilitation after spontaneous coronary artery dissection
AU - Krittanawong, Chayakrit
AU - Tweet, Marysia S.
AU - Hayes, Sarah E.
AU - Bowman, Melissa J.
AU - Gulati, Rajiv
AU - Squires, Ray W.
AU - Hayes, Sharonne N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded in part by the Mayo Clinic Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Rochester, MN; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Foundation , Chicago, IL; and SCAD Research, Incorporated , Scottsdale, AZ.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/5/15
Y1 - 2016/5/15
N2 - Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction; however, the role of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with SCAD has not been well defined. To further understand CR in patients with SCAD, we studied a large cohort of patients with confirmed SCAD enrolled in the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from January 2010 to December 2014 (n = 354). Demographics, clinical characteristics, mental health status, and details about CR participation and experience were collected through medical record review and questionnaires. Participants at time of SCAD were 46 ± 10 years old; 96% were women. Most (76%) attended ≥1 CR sessions, averaging 18 ± 12 sessions. Most reported CR-related physical and emotional benefits (82% and 75%, respectively). Of the CR nonparticipants, 57 of 85 reported not participating because CR was not recommended by their health care provider. Other reasons included inadequate transportation (10 of 85), no insurance coverage (7 of 85), cost (2 of 85), no energy (2 of 85), being too ill (2 of 85), and miscellaneous comments (5 of 85). In conclusion, 3 of 4 of patients with SCAD participated in CR, most of whom reported benefit. Lack of recommendation for CR by a health care provider was the primary reason patients did not participate.
AB - Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction; however, the role of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with SCAD has not been well defined. To further understand CR in patients with SCAD, we studied a large cohort of patients with confirmed SCAD enrolled in the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from January 2010 to December 2014 (n = 354). Demographics, clinical characteristics, mental health status, and details about CR participation and experience were collected through medical record review and questionnaires. Participants at time of SCAD were 46 ± 10 years old; 96% were women. Most (76%) attended ≥1 CR sessions, averaging 18 ± 12 sessions. Most reported CR-related physical and emotional benefits (82% and 75%, respectively). Of the CR nonparticipants, 57 of 85 reported not participating because CR was not recommended by their health care provider. Other reasons included inadequate transportation (10 of 85), no insurance coverage (7 of 85), cost (2 of 85), no energy (2 of 85), being too ill (2 of 85), and miscellaneous comments (5 of 85). In conclusion, 3 of 4 of patients with SCAD participated in CR, most of whom reported benefit. Lack of recommendation for CR by a health care provider was the primary reason patients did not participate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962022158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962022158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.034
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 27055757
AN - SCOPUS:84962022158
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 117
SP - 1604
EP - 1609
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 10
ER -