Use of the physician insurers association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S.

Valerie Meredith, Curtiss B. Cook, Alan Penman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE- To examine the available national surveillance data on malpractice claims associated with diabetes and to determine the medical specialties having the highest number of claims and the classes and costs of filed claims relating to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Data was abstracted from the Data Sharing Reports (DSRs) of the Physicians Insurers Association of America (PIAA), as well as a search of the PIAA's computerized database for the period spanning 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1996. Data on numbers of claims, medical causes of loss, indemnity paid, demographics of claimants and physicians, severity, and medical specialties with diabetes- related claims were available. RESULTS- A total of 906 diabetes claims were reported to PIAA, and the total indemnity paid was $26,892,848. A significant downward trend (P = 0.004) was noted for the period between 1993 and 1996. Diabetes claimants were older and predominately male, relative to all claimants. Ophthalmology, internal medicine, and general and family practice had the highest rates of reported claims at 16.5, 13.6, and 13.4 diabetes claims per 1,000 claims, respectively. Of the diabetes-related injuries, 44% occurred in the practitioner's office, as compared with 27% for all claims. A greater proportion of diabetes claims were associated with the highest level of severity of injury with respect to all claims compiled by the PIAA. CONCLUSIONS- The database of the PIAA can be a useful resource to monitor trends in diabetes-related malpractice. Further study into whether claims result from lack of adherence to practice guidelines is needed. Prevention programs designed to reduce the liability among high-risk specialties may also lead to improved care for the patient with diabetes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1096-1100
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Insurance Carriers
Malpractice
Databases
Physicians
Insurance
Medicine
Information Dissemination
Family Practice
Wounds and Injuries
Ophthalmology
Internal Medicine
Practice Guidelines
General Practice
Patient Care
Research Design
Demography
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Use of the physician insurers association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S. / Meredith, Valerie; Cook, Curtiss B.; Penman, Alan.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1998, p. 1096-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37e37195450e4d6498de9d5224a54085,
title = "Use of the physician insurers association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE- To examine the available national surveillance data on malpractice claims associated with diabetes and to determine the medical specialties having the highest number of claims and the classes and costs of filed claims relating to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Data was abstracted from the Data Sharing Reports (DSRs) of the Physicians Insurers Association of America (PIAA), as well as a search of the PIAA's computerized database for the period spanning 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1996. Data on numbers of claims, medical causes of loss, indemnity paid, demographics of claimants and physicians, severity, and medical specialties with diabetes- related claims were available. RESULTS- A total of 906 diabetes claims were reported to PIAA, and the total indemnity paid was $26,892,848. A significant downward trend (P = 0.004) was noted for the period between 1993 and 1996. Diabetes claimants were older and predominately male, relative to all claimants. Ophthalmology, internal medicine, and general and family practice had the highest rates of reported claims at 16.5, 13.6, and 13.4 diabetes claims per 1,000 claims, respectively. Of the diabetes-related injuries, 44{\%} occurred in the practitioner's office, as compared with 27{\%} for all claims. A greater proportion of diabetes claims were associated with the highest level of severity of injury with respect to all claims compiled by the PIAA. CONCLUSIONS- The database of the PIAA can be a useful resource to monitor trends in diabetes-related malpractice. Further study into whether claims result from lack of adherence to practice guidelines is needed. Prevention programs designed to reduce the liability among high-risk specialties may also lead to improved care for the patient with diabetes.",
author = "Valerie Meredith and Cook, {Curtiss B.} and Alan Penman",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.2337/diacare.21.7.1096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1096--1100",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the physician insurers association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S.

AU - Meredith, Valerie

AU - Cook, Curtiss B.

AU - Penman, Alan

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - OBJECTIVE- To examine the available national surveillance data on malpractice claims associated with diabetes and to determine the medical specialties having the highest number of claims and the classes and costs of filed claims relating to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Data was abstracted from the Data Sharing Reports (DSRs) of the Physicians Insurers Association of America (PIAA), as well as a search of the PIAA's computerized database for the period spanning 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1996. Data on numbers of claims, medical causes of loss, indemnity paid, demographics of claimants and physicians, severity, and medical specialties with diabetes- related claims were available. RESULTS- A total of 906 diabetes claims were reported to PIAA, and the total indemnity paid was $26,892,848. A significant downward trend (P = 0.004) was noted for the period between 1993 and 1996. Diabetes claimants were older and predominately male, relative to all claimants. Ophthalmology, internal medicine, and general and family practice had the highest rates of reported claims at 16.5, 13.6, and 13.4 diabetes claims per 1,000 claims, respectively. Of the diabetes-related injuries, 44% occurred in the practitioner's office, as compared with 27% for all claims. A greater proportion of diabetes claims were associated with the highest level of severity of injury with respect to all claims compiled by the PIAA. CONCLUSIONS- The database of the PIAA can be a useful resource to monitor trends in diabetes-related malpractice. Further study into whether claims result from lack of adherence to practice guidelines is needed. Prevention programs designed to reduce the liability among high-risk specialties may also lead to improved care for the patient with diabetes.

AB - OBJECTIVE- To examine the available national surveillance data on malpractice claims associated with diabetes and to determine the medical specialties having the highest number of claims and the classes and costs of filed claims relating to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Data was abstracted from the Data Sharing Reports (DSRs) of the Physicians Insurers Association of America (PIAA), as well as a search of the PIAA's computerized database for the period spanning 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1996. Data on numbers of claims, medical causes of loss, indemnity paid, demographics of claimants and physicians, severity, and medical specialties with diabetes- related claims were available. RESULTS- A total of 906 diabetes claims were reported to PIAA, and the total indemnity paid was $26,892,848. A significant downward trend (P = 0.004) was noted for the period between 1993 and 1996. Diabetes claimants were older and predominately male, relative to all claimants. Ophthalmology, internal medicine, and general and family practice had the highest rates of reported claims at 16.5, 13.6, and 13.4 diabetes claims per 1,000 claims, respectively. Of the diabetes-related injuries, 44% occurred in the practitioner's office, as compared with 27% for all claims. A greater proportion of diabetes claims were associated with the highest level of severity of injury with respect to all claims compiled by the PIAA. CONCLUSIONS- The database of the PIAA can be a useful resource to monitor trends in diabetes-related malpractice. Further study into whether claims result from lack of adherence to practice guidelines is needed. Prevention programs designed to reduce the liability among high-risk specialties may also lead to improved care for the patient with diabetes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031847307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031847307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1096

DO - 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1096

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1096

EP - 1100

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 7

ER -