Use of multiple picosecond high-mass molecular dynamics simulations to predict crystallographic B-factors of folded globular proteins

Yuan Ping Pang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Predicting crystallographic B-factors of a protein from a conventional molecular dynamics simulation is challenging, in part because the B-factors calculated through sampling the atomic positional fluctuations in a picosecond molecular dynamics simulation are unreliable, and the sampling of a longer simulation yields overly large root mean square deviations between calculated and experimental B-factors. This article reports improved B-factor prediction achieved by sampling the atomic positional fluctuations in multiple picosecond molecular dynamics simulations that use uniformly increased atomic masses by 100-fold to increase time resolution. Using the third immunoglobulin-binding domain of protein G, bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, ubiquitin, and lysozyme as model systems, the B-factor root mean square deviations (mean ± standard error) of these proteins were 3.1 ± 0.2–9 ± 1 Å2 for Cα and 7.3 ± 0.9–9.6 ± 0.2 Å2 for Cγ, when the sampling was done for each of these proteins over 20 distinct, independent, and 50-picosecond high-mass molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER forcefield FF12MC or FF14SB. These results suggest that sampling the atomic positional fluctuations in multiple picosecond high-mass molecular dynamics simulations may be conducive to a priori prediction of crystallographic B-factors of a folded globular protein.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere00161
JournalHeliyon
Volume2
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Keywords

  • Bioengineering
  • Bioinformatics
  • Biophysics
  • Biotechnology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of multiple picosecond high-mass molecular dynamics simulations to predict crystallographic B-factors of folded globular proteins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this