Use of labeled oral minimal model to measure hepatic insulin sensitivity

Chiara Dalla Man, Gianna Toffolo, Rita Basu, Robert A. Rizza, Claudio Cobelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to accurately quantify indexes of the individual role of glucose (GEL) and insulin (SI L) in the suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) would improve the understanding of liver metabolism. Measuring these indexes during an IVGTT by minimal modeling of tracer labeled and unlabeled glucose data is often unreliable, possibly due to an inadequate description of EGP included in the Minimal Model. Moreover, a validation of the assumptions of the Minimal Model on EGP data has never been done. Recently, Krudys et al. (Krudys KM, Dodds MG, Nissen SM, Vicini P. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1038-E1046, 2005) have proposed a PK/PD (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) model of the EGP profile that occurs during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT); however, this model has also not been validated. The aim of this study was thus to test the Minimal Model, the PK/PD model, and six alternative EGP descriptions on recent model-independent EGP data of 20 subjects obtained with a triple-tracer meal protocol. Model performance was compared in terms of data fit, precision of the estimated parameters, and physiological plausibility. Neither the PK/PD nor the traditional Minimal Model were able to accurately describe EGP data or provide reliable estimates of the indexes. In contrast, one of the new models performed best by showing a good fit and providing accurate and precise estimates of hepatic sensitivity indexes: GEL = 0.013 ± 0.001 dl·kg-1·min-1; SI L = 5.34 ± 0.47 10-4 dl·kg-1·min -1 per μU/ml (42 and 34%, respectively, of total sensitivity indexes GETOT and SI TOT). Although this model requires further validation, it has the potential to improve our understanding of the role of the liver in pathophysiological states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume295
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Insulin Resistance
Glucose
Liver
Pharmacokinetics
Glucose Tolerance Test
Meals
Insulin

Keywords

  • Glucose kinetics
  • Insulin resistance
  • Meal
  • Tracer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Use of labeled oral minimal model to measure hepatic insulin sensitivity. / Man, Chiara Dalla; Toffolo, Gianna; Basu, Rita; Rizza, Robert A.; Cobelli, Claudio.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 295, No. 5, 11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Man, Chiara Dalla ; Toffolo, Gianna ; Basu, Rita ; Rizza, Robert A. ; Cobelli, Claudio. / Use of labeled oral minimal model to measure hepatic insulin sensitivity. In: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008 ; Vol. 295, No. 5.
@article{cc58351492f34a58883340d04c2dbd71,
title = "Use of labeled oral minimal model to measure hepatic insulin sensitivity",
abstract = "The ability to accurately quantify indexes of the individual role of glucose (GEL) and insulin (SI L) in the suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) would improve the understanding of liver metabolism. Measuring these indexes during an IVGTT by minimal modeling of tracer labeled and unlabeled glucose data is often unreliable, possibly due to an inadequate description of EGP included in the Minimal Model. Moreover, a validation of the assumptions of the Minimal Model on EGP data has never been done. Recently, Krudys et al. (Krudys KM, Dodds MG, Nissen SM, Vicini P. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1038-E1046, 2005) have proposed a PK/PD (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) model of the EGP profile that occurs during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT); however, this model has also not been validated. The aim of this study was thus to test the Minimal Model, the PK/PD model, and six alternative EGP descriptions on recent model-independent EGP data of 20 subjects obtained with a triple-tracer meal protocol. Model performance was compared in terms of data fit, precision of the estimated parameters, and physiological plausibility. Neither the PK/PD nor the traditional Minimal Model were able to accurately describe EGP data or provide reliable estimates of the indexes. In contrast, one of the new models performed best by showing a good fit and providing accurate and precise estimates of hepatic sensitivity indexes: GEL = 0.013 ± 0.001 dl·kg-1·min-1; SI L = 5.34 ± 0.47 10-4 dl·kg-1·min -1 per μU/ml (42 and 34{\%}, respectively, of total sensitivity indexes GETOT and SI TOT). Although this model requires further validation, it has the potential to improve our understanding of the role of the liver in pathophysiological states.",
keywords = "Glucose kinetics, Insulin resistance, Meal, Tracer",
author = "Man, {Chiara Dalla} and Gianna Toffolo and Rita Basu and Rizza, {Robert A.} and Claudio Cobelli",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "295",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology",
issn = "1931-857X",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of labeled oral minimal model to measure hepatic insulin sensitivity

AU - Man, Chiara Dalla

AU - Toffolo, Gianna

AU - Basu, Rita

AU - Rizza, Robert A.

AU - Cobelli, Claudio

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - The ability to accurately quantify indexes of the individual role of glucose (GEL) and insulin (SI L) in the suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) would improve the understanding of liver metabolism. Measuring these indexes during an IVGTT by minimal modeling of tracer labeled and unlabeled glucose data is often unreliable, possibly due to an inadequate description of EGP included in the Minimal Model. Moreover, a validation of the assumptions of the Minimal Model on EGP data has never been done. Recently, Krudys et al. (Krudys KM, Dodds MG, Nissen SM, Vicini P. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1038-E1046, 2005) have proposed a PK/PD (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) model of the EGP profile that occurs during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT); however, this model has also not been validated. The aim of this study was thus to test the Minimal Model, the PK/PD model, and six alternative EGP descriptions on recent model-independent EGP data of 20 subjects obtained with a triple-tracer meal protocol. Model performance was compared in terms of data fit, precision of the estimated parameters, and physiological plausibility. Neither the PK/PD nor the traditional Minimal Model were able to accurately describe EGP data or provide reliable estimates of the indexes. In contrast, one of the new models performed best by showing a good fit and providing accurate and precise estimates of hepatic sensitivity indexes: GEL = 0.013 ± 0.001 dl·kg-1·min-1; SI L = 5.34 ± 0.47 10-4 dl·kg-1·min -1 per μU/ml (42 and 34%, respectively, of total sensitivity indexes GETOT and SI TOT). Although this model requires further validation, it has the potential to improve our understanding of the role of the liver in pathophysiological states.

AB - The ability to accurately quantify indexes of the individual role of glucose (GEL) and insulin (SI L) in the suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) would improve the understanding of liver metabolism. Measuring these indexes during an IVGTT by minimal modeling of tracer labeled and unlabeled glucose data is often unreliable, possibly due to an inadequate description of EGP included in the Minimal Model. Moreover, a validation of the assumptions of the Minimal Model on EGP data has never been done. Recently, Krudys et al. (Krudys KM, Dodds MG, Nissen SM, Vicini P. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288: E1038-E1046, 2005) have proposed a PK/PD (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) model of the EGP profile that occurs during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT); however, this model has also not been validated. The aim of this study was thus to test the Minimal Model, the PK/PD model, and six alternative EGP descriptions on recent model-independent EGP data of 20 subjects obtained with a triple-tracer meal protocol. Model performance was compared in terms of data fit, precision of the estimated parameters, and physiological plausibility. Neither the PK/PD nor the traditional Minimal Model were able to accurately describe EGP data or provide reliable estimates of the indexes. In contrast, one of the new models performed best by showing a good fit and providing accurate and precise estimates of hepatic sensitivity indexes: GEL = 0.013 ± 0.001 dl·kg-1·min-1; SI L = 5.34 ± 0.47 10-4 dl·kg-1·min -1 per μU/ml (42 and 34%, respectively, of total sensitivity indexes GETOT and SI TOT). Although this model requires further validation, it has the potential to improve our understanding of the role of the liver in pathophysiological states.

KW - Glucose kinetics

KW - Insulin resistance

KW - Meal

KW - Tracer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049181334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049181334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2007

DO - 10.1152/ajpendo.00486.2007

M3 - Article

C2 - 18765681

AN - SCOPUS:57049181334

VL - 295

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology

SN - 1931-857X

IS - 5

ER -