Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: An updated analysis of keynote-010 trial

R. S. Herbst, P. Baas, J. L. Perez-Gracia, E. Felip, D. W. Kim, J. Y. Han, J. R. Molina, J. H. Kim, C. Dubos Arvis, M. J. Ahn, M. Majem, M. J. Fidler, V. Surmont, G. De Castro, M. Garrido, Y. Shentu, K. Emancipator, A. Samkari, E. H. Jensen, G. M. LubinieckiE. B. Garon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background In KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data. Patients and methods PD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis. Results At date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23-41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)]. Conclusion Pembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-289
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • Pd-l1 expression
  • Pembrolizumab
  • Tumor samples

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: An updated analysis of keynote-010 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this