Unresolved issues in theories of autoimmune disease using myocarditis as a framework

Robert Root-Bernstein, DeLisa Fairweather

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many theories of autoimmune disease have been proposed since the discovery that the immune system can attack the body. These theories include the hidden or cryptic antigen theory, modified antigen theory, T cell bypass, T cell-B cell mismatch, epitope spread or drift, the bystander effect, molecular mimicry, anti-idiotype theory, antigenic complementarity, and dual-affinity T cell receptors. We critically review these theories and relevant mathematical models as they apply to autoimmune myocarditis. All theories share the common assumption that autoimmune diseases are triggered by environmental factors such as infections or chemical exposure. Most, but not all, theories and mathematical models are unifactorial assuming single-agent causation of disease. Experimental and clinical evidence and mathematical models exist to support some aspects of most theories, but evidence/models that support one theory almost invariably supports other theories as well. More importantly, every theory (and every model) lacks the ability to account for some key autoimmune disease phenomena such as the fundamental roles of innate immunity, sex differences in disease susceptibility, the necessity for adjuvants in experimental animal models, and the often paradoxical effect of exposure timing and dose on disease induction. We argue that a more comprehensive and integrated theory of autoimmunity associated with new mathematical models is needed and suggest specific experimental and clinical tests for each major theory that might help to clarify how they relate to clinical disease and reveal how theories are related.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-123
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Theoretical Biology
Volume375
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myocarditis
myocarditis
autoimmune diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Theoretical Models
mathematical models
T-lymphocytes
T-cells
Mathematical models
molecular mimicry
Bystander Effect
Molecular Mimicry
antigens
B-Lymphocyte Epitopes
T-Lymphocytes
Antigens
autoimmunity
Disease Susceptibility
T-Cell Antigen Receptor
Autoimmunity

Keywords

  • Antigenic complementarity
  • Autoimmune disease theories and modeling
  • Infection
  • Myocarditis
  • Sex differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Unresolved issues in theories of autoimmune disease using myocarditis as a framework. / Root-Bernstein, Robert; Fairweather, DeLisa.

In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 375, 01.06.2014, p. 101-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7a1045369614ebeab40963379e0339a,
title = "Unresolved issues in theories of autoimmune disease using myocarditis as a framework",
abstract = "Many theories of autoimmune disease have been proposed since the discovery that the immune system can attack the body. These theories include the hidden or cryptic antigen theory, modified antigen theory, T cell bypass, T cell-B cell mismatch, epitope spread or drift, the bystander effect, molecular mimicry, anti-idiotype theory, antigenic complementarity, and dual-affinity T cell receptors. We critically review these theories and relevant mathematical models as they apply to autoimmune myocarditis. All theories share the common assumption that autoimmune diseases are triggered by environmental factors such as infections or chemical exposure. Most, but not all, theories and mathematical models are unifactorial assuming single-agent causation of disease. Experimental and clinical evidence and mathematical models exist to support some aspects of most theories, but evidence/models that support one theory almost invariably supports other theories as well. More importantly, every theory (and every model) lacks the ability to account for some key autoimmune disease phenomena such as the fundamental roles of innate immunity, sex differences in disease susceptibility, the necessity for adjuvants in experimental animal models, and the often paradoxical effect of exposure timing and dose on disease induction. We argue that a more comprehensive and integrated theory of autoimmunity associated with new mathematical models is needed and suggest specific experimental and clinical tests for each major theory that might help to clarify how they relate to clinical disease and reveal how theories are related.",
keywords = "Antigenic complementarity, Autoimmune disease theories and modeling, Infection, Myocarditis, Sex differences",
author = "Robert Root-Bernstein and DeLisa Fairweather",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "375",
pages = "101--123",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical Biology",
issn = "0022-5193",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unresolved issues in theories of autoimmune disease using myocarditis as a framework

AU - Root-Bernstein, Robert

AU - Fairweather, DeLisa

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - Many theories of autoimmune disease have been proposed since the discovery that the immune system can attack the body. These theories include the hidden or cryptic antigen theory, modified antigen theory, T cell bypass, T cell-B cell mismatch, epitope spread or drift, the bystander effect, molecular mimicry, anti-idiotype theory, antigenic complementarity, and dual-affinity T cell receptors. We critically review these theories and relevant mathematical models as they apply to autoimmune myocarditis. All theories share the common assumption that autoimmune diseases are triggered by environmental factors such as infections or chemical exposure. Most, but not all, theories and mathematical models are unifactorial assuming single-agent causation of disease. Experimental and clinical evidence and mathematical models exist to support some aspects of most theories, but evidence/models that support one theory almost invariably supports other theories as well. More importantly, every theory (and every model) lacks the ability to account for some key autoimmune disease phenomena such as the fundamental roles of innate immunity, sex differences in disease susceptibility, the necessity for adjuvants in experimental animal models, and the often paradoxical effect of exposure timing and dose on disease induction. We argue that a more comprehensive and integrated theory of autoimmunity associated with new mathematical models is needed and suggest specific experimental and clinical tests for each major theory that might help to clarify how they relate to clinical disease and reveal how theories are related.

AB - Many theories of autoimmune disease have been proposed since the discovery that the immune system can attack the body. These theories include the hidden or cryptic antigen theory, modified antigen theory, T cell bypass, T cell-B cell mismatch, epitope spread or drift, the bystander effect, molecular mimicry, anti-idiotype theory, antigenic complementarity, and dual-affinity T cell receptors. We critically review these theories and relevant mathematical models as they apply to autoimmune myocarditis. All theories share the common assumption that autoimmune diseases are triggered by environmental factors such as infections or chemical exposure. Most, but not all, theories and mathematical models are unifactorial assuming single-agent causation of disease. Experimental and clinical evidence and mathematical models exist to support some aspects of most theories, but evidence/models that support one theory almost invariably supports other theories as well. More importantly, every theory (and every model) lacks the ability to account for some key autoimmune disease phenomena such as the fundamental roles of innate immunity, sex differences in disease susceptibility, the necessity for adjuvants in experimental animal models, and the often paradoxical effect of exposure timing and dose on disease induction. We argue that a more comprehensive and integrated theory of autoimmunity associated with new mathematical models is needed and suggest specific experimental and clinical tests for each major theory that might help to clarify how they relate to clinical disease and reveal how theories are related.

KW - Antigenic complementarity

KW - Autoimmune disease theories and modeling

KW - Infection

KW - Myocarditis

KW - Sex differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940006490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940006490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.022

M3 - Article

VL - 375

SP - 101

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology

JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology

SN - 0022-5193

ER -