United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research: Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data

Michael Von Korff, Ann I. Scher, Charles Helmick, Olivia Carter-Pokras, David William Dodick, Joseph Goulet, Robin Hamill-Ruth, Linda LeResche, Linda Porter, Raymond Tait, Gregory Terman, Christin Veasley, Sean Mackey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14% had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases. Perspective: Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pain
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 11 2016

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Pain
Research
Population
Delivery of Health Care
Health Surveys
Health Care Costs
Databases
Electronic Health Records
Postal Service
Pain Measurement
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Primary Health Care
Quality of Life
Interviews

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Electronic databases
  • Epidemiology
  • Health services research
  • Prevalence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research : Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data. / Von Korff, Michael; Scher, Ann I.; Helmick, Charles; Carter-Pokras, Olivia; Dodick, David William; Goulet, Joseph; Hamill-Ruth, Robin; LeResche, Linda; Porter, Linda; Tait, Raymond; Terman, Gregory; Veasley, Christin; Mackey, Sean.

In: Journal of Pain, 11.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Von Korff, M, Scher, AI, Helmick, C, Carter-Pokras, O, Dodick, DW, Goulet, J, Hamill-Ruth, R, LeResche, L, Porter, L, Tait, R, Terman, G, Veasley, C & Mackey, S 2016, 'United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research: Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data', Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.009
Von Korff, Michael ; Scher, Ann I. ; Helmick, Charles ; Carter-Pokras, Olivia ; Dodick, David William ; Goulet, Joseph ; Hamill-Ruth, Robin ; LeResche, Linda ; Porter, Linda ; Tait, Raymond ; Terman, Gregory ; Veasley, Christin ; Mackey, Sean. / United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research : Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data. In: Journal of Pain. 2016.
@article{431fe63ddf134964b56a846c7d754863,
title = "United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research: Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data",
abstract = "National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14{\%} had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases. Perspective: Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Electronic databases, Epidemiology, Health services research, Prevalence",
author = "{Von Korff}, Michael and Scher, {Ann I.} and Charles Helmick and Olivia Carter-Pokras and Dodick, {David William} and Joseph Goulet and Robin Hamill-Ruth and Linda LeResche and Linda Porter and Raymond Tait and Gregory Terman and Christin Veasley and Sean Mackey",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - United States National Pain Strategy for Population Research

T2 - Concepts, Definitions, and Pilot Data

AU - Von Korff, Michael

AU - Scher, Ann I.

AU - Helmick, Charles

AU - Carter-Pokras, Olivia

AU - Dodick, David William

AU - Goulet, Joseph

AU - Hamill-Ruth, Robin

AU - LeResche, Linda

AU - Porter, Linda

AU - Tait, Raymond

AU - Terman, Gregory

AU - Veasley, Christin

AU - Mackey, Sean

PY - 2016/1/11

Y1 - 2016/1/11

N2 - National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14% had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases. Perspective: Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.

AB - National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14% had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases. Perspective: Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Electronic databases

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Health services research

KW - Prevalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981725621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981725621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 27377620

AN - SCOPUS:84981725621

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

ER -