Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment: Insights from dual process models of stereotyping

Diana J. Burgess, Michelle van Ryn, Megan Crowley-Matoka, Jennifer Malat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This article applied dual process models of stereotyping to illustrate how various psychological mechanisms may lead to unintentional provider bias in decisions about pain treatment. Stereotypes have been shown to influence judgments and behaviors by two distinct cognitive processes, automatic stereotyping and goal-modified stereotyping, which differ both in level of individual conscious control and how much they are influenced by the goals in an interaction. Although these two processes may occur simultaneously and are difficult to disentangle, the conceptual distinction is important because unintentional bias that results from goal-modified rather than automatic stereotyping requires different types of interventions. We proposed a series of hypotheses that showed how these different processes may lead providers to contribute to disparities in pain treatment: 1) indirectly, by influencing the content and affective tone of the clinical encounter; and 2) directly, by influencing provider decision making. We also highlighted situations that may increase the likelihood that stereotype-based bias will occur and suggested directions for future research and interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-134
Number of pages16
JournalPain Medicine
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stereotyping
Pain
Therapeutics
Decision Making
Psychology

Keywords

  • Disparities
  • Ethnicity
  • Pain management
  • Provider behavior
  • Race
  • Stereotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment : Insights from dual process models of stereotyping. / Burgess, Diana J.; van Ryn, Michelle; Crowley-Matoka, Megan; Malat, Jennifer.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 03.2006, p. 119-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgess, Diana J. ; van Ryn, Michelle ; Crowley-Matoka, Megan ; Malat, Jennifer. / Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment : Insights from dual process models of stereotyping. In: Pain Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 119-134.
@article{a20e39c1c84340dc98e0fcead70b9e63,
title = "Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment: Insights from dual process models of stereotyping",
abstract = "Objective. This article applied dual process models of stereotyping to illustrate how various psychological mechanisms may lead to unintentional provider bias in decisions about pain treatment. Stereotypes have been shown to influence judgments and behaviors by two distinct cognitive processes, automatic stereotyping and goal-modified stereotyping, which differ both in level of individual conscious control and how much they are influenced by the goals in an interaction. Although these two processes may occur simultaneously and are difficult to disentangle, the conceptual distinction is important because unintentional bias that results from goal-modified rather than automatic stereotyping requires different types of interventions. We proposed a series of hypotheses that showed how these different processes may lead providers to contribute to disparities in pain treatment: 1) indirectly, by influencing the content and affective tone of the clinical encounter; and 2) directly, by influencing provider decision making. We also highlighted situations that may increase the likelihood that stereotype-based bias will occur and suggested directions for future research and interventions.",
keywords = "Disparities, Ethnicity, Pain management, Provider behavior, Race, Stereotyping",
author = "Burgess, {Diana J.} and {van Ryn}, Michelle and Megan Crowley-Matoka and Jennifer Malat",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00105.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "119--134",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment

T2 - Insights from dual process models of stereotyping

AU - Burgess, Diana J.

AU - van Ryn, Michelle

AU - Crowley-Matoka, Megan

AU - Malat, Jennifer

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Objective. This article applied dual process models of stereotyping to illustrate how various psychological mechanisms may lead to unintentional provider bias in decisions about pain treatment. Stereotypes have been shown to influence judgments and behaviors by two distinct cognitive processes, automatic stereotyping and goal-modified stereotyping, which differ both in level of individual conscious control and how much they are influenced by the goals in an interaction. Although these two processes may occur simultaneously and are difficult to disentangle, the conceptual distinction is important because unintentional bias that results from goal-modified rather than automatic stereotyping requires different types of interventions. We proposed a series of hypotheses that showed how these different processes may lead providers to contribute to disparities in pain treatment: 1) indirectly, by influencing the content and affective tone of the clinical encounter; and 2) directly, by influencing provider decision making. We also highlighted situations that may increase the likelihood that stereotype-based bias will occur and suggested directions for future research and interventions.

AB - Objective. This article applied dual process models of stereotyping to illustrate how various psychological mechanisms may lead to unintentional provider bias in decisions about pain treatment. Stereotypes have been shown to influence judgments and behaviors by two distinct cognitive processes, automatic stereotyping and goal-modified stereotyping, which differ both in level of individual conscious control and how much they are influenced by the goals in an interaction. Although these two processes may occur simultaneously and are difficult to disentangle, the conceptual distinction is important because unintentional bias that results from goal-modified rather than automatic stereotyping requires different types of interventions. We proposed a series of hypotheses that showed how these different processes may lead providers to contribute to disparities in pain treatment: 1) indirectly, by influencing the content and affective tone of the clinical encounter; and 2) directly, by influencing provider decision making. We also highlighted situations that may increase the likelihood that stereotype-based bias will occur and suggested directions for future research and interventions.

KW - Disparities

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Pain management

KW - Provider behavior

KW - Race

KW - Stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645146411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645146411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00105.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00105.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16634725

AN - SCOPUS:33645146411

VL - 7

SP - 119

EP - 134

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 2

ER -