Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

Katie Gallacher, Deborah Morrison, Bhautesh Jani, Sara Macdonald, Carl R. May, Victor Manuel Montori, Patricia J. Erwin, G. David Batty, David T Eton, Peter Langhorne, Frances S. Mair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Patients with chronic disease may experience complicated management plans requiring significant personal investment. This has been termed 'treatment burden' and has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the qualitative literature on treatment burden in stroke from the patient perspective.Methods and Findings:The search strategy centred on: stroke, treatment burden, patient experience, and qualitative methods. We searched: Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO. We tracked references, footnotes, and citations. Restrictions included: English language, date of publication January 2000 until February 2013. Two reviewers independently carried out the following: paper screening, data extraction, and data analysis. Data were analysed using framework synthesis, as informed by Normalization Process Theory. Sixty-nine papers were included. Treatment burden includes: (1) making sense of stroke management and planning care, (2) interacting with others, (3) enacting management strategies, and (4) reflecting on management. Health care is fragmented, with poor communication between patient and health care providers. Patients report inadequate information provision. Inpatient care is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating activities on the ward. Discharge services are poorly coordinated, and accessing health and social care in the community is difficult. The study has potential limitations because it was restricted to studies published in English only and data from low-income countries were scarce.Conclusions:Stroke management is extremely demanding for patients, and treatment burden is influenced by micro and macro organisation of health services. Knowledge deficits mean patients are ill equipped to organise their care and develop coping strategies, making adherence less likely. There is a need to transform the approach to care provision so that services are configured to prioritise patient needs rather than those of health care systems.Systematic Review Registration:International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42011001123 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere1001473
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
Stroke
Health care
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics
Macros
Screening
Health Personnel
Planning
Health Services
Publications
Inpatients
Patient Care
Chronic Disease
Language
Communication
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care : A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. / Gallacher, Katie; Morrison, Deborah; Jani, Bhautesh; Macdonald, Sara; May, Carl R.; Montori, Victor Manuel; Erwin, Patricia J.; Batty, G. David; Eton, David T; Langhorne, Peter; Mair, Frances S.

In: PLoS Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 6, e1001473, 06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gallacher, K, Morrison, D, Jani, B, Macdonald, S, May, CR, Montori, VM, Erwin, PJ, Batty, GD, Eton, DT, Langhorne, P & Mair, FS 2013, 'Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research', PLoS Medicine, vol. 10, no. 6, e1001473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473
Gallacher, Katie ; Morrison, Deborah ; Jani, Bhautesh ; Macdonald, Sara ; May, Carl R. ; Montori, Victor Manuel ; Erwin, Patricia J. ; Batty, G. David ; Eton, David T ; Langhorne, Peter ; Mair, Frances S. / Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care : A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. In: PLoS Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.
@article{3d86fc128d374603bcdf283272a2313c,
title = "Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research",
abstract = "Background:Patients with chronic disease may experience complicated management plans requiring significant personal investment. This has been termed 'treatment burden' and has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the qualitative literature on treatment burden in stroke from the patient perspective.Methods and Findings:The search strategy centred on: stroke, treatment burden, patient experience, and qualitative methods. We searched: Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO. We tracked references, footnotes, and citations. Restrictions included: English language, date of publication January 2000 until February 2013. Two reviewers independently carried out the following: paper screening, data extraction, and data analysis. Data were analysed using framework synthesis, as informed by Normalization Process Theory. Sixty-nine papers were included. Treatment burden includes: (1) making sense of stroke management and planning care, (2) interacting with others, (3) enacting management strategies, and (4) reflecting on management. Health care is fragmented, with poor communication between patient and health care providers. Patients report inadequate information provision. Inpatient care is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating activities on the ward. Discharge services are poorly coordinated, and accessing health and social care in the community is difficult. The study has potential limitations because it was restricted to studies published in English only and data from low-income countries were scarce.Conclusions:Stroke management is extremely demanding for patients, and treatment burden is influenced by micro and macro organisation of health services. Knowledge deficits mean patients are ill equipped to organise their care and develop coping strategies, making adherence less likely. There is a need to transform the approach to care provision so that services are configured to prioritise patient needs rather than those of health care systems.Systematic Review Registration:International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42011001123 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.",
author = "Katie Gallacher and Deborah Morrison and Bhautesh Jani and Sara Macdonald and May, {Carl R.} and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Erwin, {Patricia J.} and Batty, {G. David} and Eton, {David T} and Peter Langhorne and Mair, {Frances S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS Medicine",
issn = "1549-1277",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care

T2 - A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

AU - Gallacher, Katie

AU - Morrison, Deborah

AU - Jani, Bhautesh

AU - Macdonald, Sara

AU - May, Carl R.

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - Erwin, Patricia J.

AU - Batty, G. David

AU - Eton, David T

AU - Langhorne, Peter

AU - Mair, Frances S.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background:Patients with chronic disease may experience complicated management plans requiring significant personal investment. This has been termed 'treatment burden' and has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the qualitative literature on treatment burden in stroke from the patient perspective.Methods and Findings:The search strategy centred on: stroke, treatment burden, patient experience, and qualitative methods. We searched: Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO. We tracked references, footnotes, and citations. Restrictions included: English language, date of publication January 2000 until February 2013. Two reviewers independently carried out the following: paper screening, data extraction, and data analysis. Data were analysed using framework synthesis, as informed by Normalization Process Theory. Sixty-nine papers were included. Treatment burden includes: (1) making sense of stroke management and planning care, (2) interacting with others, (3) enacting management strategies, and (4) reflecting on management. Health care is fragmented, with poor communication between patient and health care providers. Patients report inadequate information provision. Inpatient care is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating activities on the ward. Discharge services are poorly coordinated, and accessing health and social care in the community is difficult. The study has potential limitations because it was restricted to studies published in English only and data from low-income countries were scarce.Conclusions:Stroke management is extremely demanding for patients, and treatment burden is influenced by micro and macro organisation of health services. Knowledge deficits mean patients are ill equipped to organise their care and develop coping strategies, making adherence less likely. There is a need to transform the approach to care provision so that services are configured to prioritise patient needs rather than those of health care systems.Systematic Review Registration:International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42011001123 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

AB - Background:Patients with chronic disease may experience complicated management plans requiring significant personal investment. This has been termed 'treatment burden' and has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the qualitative literature on treatment burden in stroke from the patient perspective.Methods and Findings:The search strategy centred on: stroke, treatment burden, patient experience, and qualitative methods. We searched: Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO. We tracked references, footnotes, and citations. Restrictions included: English language, date of publication January 2000 until February 2013. Two reviewers independently carried out the following: paper screening, data extraction, and data analysis. Data were analysed using framework synthesis, as informed by Normalization Process Theory. Sixty-nine papers were included. Treatment burden includes: (1) making sense of stroke management and planning care, (2) interacting with others, (3) enacting management strategies, and (4) reflecting on management. Health care is fragmented, with poor communication between patient and health care providers. Patients report inadequate information provision. Inpatient care is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating activities on the ward. Discharge services are poorly coordinated, and accessing health and social care in the community is difficult. The study has potential limitations because it was restricted to studies published in English only and data from low-income countries were scarce.Conclusions:Stroke management is extremely demanding for patients, and treatment burden is influenced by micro and macro organisation of health services. Knowledge deficits mean patients are ill equipped to organise their care and develop coping strategies, making adherence less likely. There is a need to transform the approach to care provision so that services are configured to prioritise patient needs rather than those of health care systems.Systematic Review Registration:International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42011001123 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879357091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879357091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473

M3 - Article

C2 - 23824703

AN - SCOPUS:84879357091

VL - 10

JO - PLoS Medicine

JF - PLoS Medicine

SN - 1549-1277

IS - 6

M1 - e1001473

ER -