Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalAbdominal Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 7 2017

Fingerprint

Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Liver
Fibrosis
Hyperemia
Portal Hypertension
Liver Diseases
Chronic Disease
Biomarkers
Inflammation

Keywords

  • Elastography
  • Hepatic fibrosis
  • Liver stiffness
  • MRI
  • Shear wave
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology

Cite this

Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver : which one shall I use? / Yin, Meng; Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.

In: Abdominal Radiology, 07.10.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43994022fe0c430995020c428e4b3af5,
title = "Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?",
abstract = "Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Elastography, Hepatic fibrosis, Liver stiffness, MRI, Shear wave, Ultrasound",
author = "Meng Yin and Venkatesh, {Sudhakar K}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-017-1340-z",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver

T2 - which one shall I use?

AU - Yin, Meng

AU - Venkatesh, Sudhakar K

PY - 2017/10/7

Y1 - 2017/10/7

N2 - Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.

AB - Liver stiffness is now a well-established noninvasive biomarker for assessing fibrosis in chronic liver disease. MRI-based and ultrasound-based dynamic elastography techniques have been introduced for assessment of liver stiffness and useful in clinical staging of hepatic fibrosis. Several different elastography techniques are now available with each method having inherent strengths and limitations. The published literature generally indicates that MR elastography has a higher diagnostic performance and fewer technical failures than ultrasound-based elastography techniques in assessing hepatic fibrosis. There is also significant potential to further develop elastography techniques to implement multiparametric methods that have promise for distinguishing between processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, venous congestion, and portal hypertension that can result in increased liver stiffness. In this commentary, we compare MR and ultrasound elastography methods and their utility in clinical practice.

KW - Elastography

KW - Hepatic fibrosis

KW - Liver stiffness

KW - MRI

KW - Shear wave

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030715076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030715076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-017-1340-z

DO - 10.1007/s00261-017-1340-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 28988274

AN - SCOPUS:85030715076

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

ER -