Twenty-Year Outcome after Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Analysis of a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, International Registry

Siham Lazam, Jean Louis Vanoverschelde, Christophe Tribouilloy, Francesco Grigioni, Rakesh M. Suri, Jean Francois Avierinos, Christophe De Meester, Andrea Barbieri, Dan Rusinaru, Antonio Russo, Agnès Pasquet, Hector I. Michelena, Marianne Huebner, Joseph Maalouf, Marie Annick Clavel, Catherine Szymanski, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement in clinical guidelines and is an important determinant of the indication for surgery in degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the level of evidence supporting current recommendations is low, and recent data cast doubts on its validity in the current era. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to analyze very long-Term outcome after MV repair and replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet. Methods: MIDA (Mitral Regurgitation International Database) is a multicenter registry enrolling patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet in 6 tertiary European and US centers. We analyzed the outcome after MV repair (n=1709) and replacement (n=213) overall, by propensity score matching, and by inverse probability-of-Treatment weighting. Results: At baseline, patients undergoing MV repair were younger, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to present with a posterior leaflet prolapse than those undergoing MV replacement. After propensity score matching and inverse probability-of-Treatment weighting, the 2 treatments groups were balanced, and absolute standardized differences were usually <10%, indicating adequate match. Operative mortality (defined as a death occurring within 30 days from surgery or during the same hospitalization) was lower after MV repair than after replacement in both the entire population (1.3% versus 4.7%; P<0.001) and the propensity-matched population (0.2% versus 4.4%; P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 552 deaths were observed, of which 207 were of cardiovascular origin. Twenty-year survival was better after MV repair than after MV replacement in both the entire population (46% versus 23%; P<0.001) and the matched population (41% versus 24%; P<0.001). Similar superiority of MV repair was obtained in patient subsets on the basis of age, sex, or any stratification criteria (all P<0.001). MV repair was also associated with reduced incidence of reoperations and valve-related complications. Conclusions: Among patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet referred to mitral surgery, MV repair was associated with lower operative mortality, better long-Term survival, and fewer valve-related complications compared with MV replacement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-422
Number of pages13
JournalCirculation
Volume135
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 31 2017

Keywords

  • mitral valve
  • mitral valve insufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty-Year Outcome after Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Analysis of a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, International Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lazam, S., Vanoverschelde, J. L., Tribouilloy, C., Grigioni, F., Suri, R. M., Avierinos, J. F., Meester, C. D., Barbieri, A., Rusinaru, D., Russo, A., Pasquet, A., Michelena, H. I., Huebner, M., Maalouf, J., Clavel, M. A., Szymanski, C., & Enriquez-Sarano, M. (2017). Twenty-Year Outcome after Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Analysis of a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, International Registry. Circulation, 135(5), 410-422. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023340