TU‐E‐304A‐03

Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists?

B. Schueler, G. Sturchio, R. Landsworth, M. Hindal, D. Magnuson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Leaded eyewear is commonly recommended for physicians routinely performing interventional fluoroscopy procedures. However, radiation‐attenuating glasses and goggles can be heavy and uncomfortable. Recently, several new lightweight eyewear designs have become available. Two such designs were investigated to determine how well they are able to reduce eye dose under clinical conditions. Materials and Methods: The eye dose was measured using OSL nanodot dosimeters positioned on a Rando head phantom. The phantom was positioned next to an acrylic phantom to duplicate the position of an operator exposed to scattered x‐rays. Eye dose was measured with and without leaded eyewear in three different positions: head directed toward the scatter volume and angled 45 and 90 degrees. The eyewear investigated included standard style glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type A), sport‐wrap glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type B) and a panorama shield with 0.07 mm lead equivalent acrylic lenses (Type C). Results: With the phantom head directed toward the scatter volume, the eye dose was reduced by 90%, 88% and 61% for Type A, B and C, respectively. Each value is lower than expected from the attenuation of the lenses alone, indicating backscatter is a significant contribution. At 90 degrees, eye protection dropped somewhat for Type A (75%), significantly for Type B (31%), while remaining the same for Type C (61%). The poor protection afforded by Type B at 90 degrees was primarily due to limited side coverage. Conclusion: Even though the lead equivalent thickness of Type C is much lower than other designs tested, increased side coverage resulted in nearly equivalent eye dose reduction when side exposure was predominant. The use of 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses appears to have diminishing returns given that backscatter and side exposure are a significant source of eye exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2747-2748
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Radiation Protection
Lenses
Glass
Head
Eye Protective Devices
Fluoroscopy
X-Rays
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TU‐E‐304A‐03 : Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists? / Schueler, B.; Sturchio, G.; Landsworth, R.; Hindal, M.; Magnuson, D.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, p. 2747-2748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schueler, B, Sturchio, G, Landsworth, R, Hindal, M & Magnuson, D 2009, 'TU‐E‐304A‐03: Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists?', Medical Physics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2747-2748. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3182427
Schueler, B. ; Sturchio, G. ; Landsworth, R. ; Hindal, M. ; Magnuson, D. / TU‐E‐304A‐03 : Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists?. In: Medical Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 2747-2748.
@article{16beb1aa8d0c4dbab4cc9b72aee8d94c,
title = "TU‐E‐304A‐03: Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists?",
abstract = "Purpose: Leaded eyewear is commonly recommended for physicians routinely performing interventional fluoroscopy procedures. However, radiation‐attenuating glasses and goggles can be heavy and uncomfortable. Recently, several new lightweight eyewear designs have become available. Two such designs were investigated to determine how well they are able to reduce eye dose under clinical conditions. Materials and Methods: The eye dose was measured using OSL nanodot dosimeters positioned on a Rando head phantom. The phantom was positioned next to an acrylic phantom to duplicate the position of an operator exposed to scattered x‐rays. Eye dose was measured with and without leaded eyewear in three different positions: head directed toward the scatter volume and angled 45 and 90 degrees. The eyewear investigated included standard style glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type A), sport‐wrap glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type B) and a panorama shield with 0.07 mm lead equivalent acrylic lenses (Type C). Results: With the phantom head directed toward the scatter volume, the eye dose was reduced by 90{\%}, 88{\%} and 61{\%} for Type A, B and C, respectively. Each value is lower than expected from the attenuation of the lenses alone, indicating backscatter is a significant contribution. At 90 degrees, eye protection dropped somewhat for Type A (75{\%}), significantly for Type B (31{\%}), while remaining the same for Type C (61{\%}). The poor protection afforded by Type B at 90 degrees was primarily due to limited side coverage. Conclusion: Even though the lead equivalent thickness of Type C is much lower than other designs tested, increased side coverage resulted in nearly equivalent eye dose reduction when side exposure was predominant. The use of 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses appears to have diminishing returns given that backscatter and side exposure are a significant source of eye exposure.",
author = "B. Schueler and G. Sturchio and R. Landsworth and M. Hindal and D. Magnuson",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182427",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2747--2748",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TU‐E‐304A‐03

T2 - Does New Lightweight Leaded Eyewear Provide Adequate Radiation Protection for Fluoroscopists?

AU - Schueler, B.

AU - Sturchio, G.

AU - Landsworth, R.

AU - Hindal, M.

AU - Magnuson, D.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: Leaded eyewear is commonly recommended for physicians routinely performing interventional fluoroscopy procedures. However, radiation‐attenuating glasses and goggles can be heavy and uncomfortable. Recently, several new lightweight eyewear designs have become available. Two such designs were investigated to determine how well they are able to reduce eye dose under clinical conditions. Materials and Methods: The eye dose was measured using OSL nanodot dosimeters positioned on a Rando head phantom. The phantom was positioned next to an acrylic phantom to duplicate the position of an operator exposed to scattered x‐rays. Eye dose was measured with and without leaded eyewear in three different positions: head directed toward the scatter volume and angled 45 and 90 degrees. The eyewear investigated included standard style glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type A), sport‐wrap glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type B) and a panorama shield with 0.07 mm lead equivalent acrylic lenses (Type C). Results: With the phantom head directed toward the scatter volume, the eye dose was reduced by 90%, 88% and 61% for Type A, B and C, respectively. Each value is lower than expected from the attenuation of the lenses alone, indicating backscatter is a significant contribution. At 90 degrees, eye protection dropped somewhat for Type A (75%), significantly for Type B (31%), while remaining the same for Type C (61%). The poor protection afforded by Type B at 90 degrees was primarily due to limited side coverage. Conclusion: Even though the lead equivalent thickness of Type C is much lower than other designs tested, increased side coverage resulted in nearly equivalent eye dose reduction when side exposure was predominant. The use of 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses appears to have diminishing returns given that backscatter and side exposure are a significant source of eye exposure.

AB - Purpose: Leaded eyewear is commonly recommended for physicians routinely performing interventional fluoroscopy procedures. However, radiation‐attenuating glasses and goggles can be heavy and uncomfortable. Recently, several new lightweight eyewear designs have become available. Two such designs were investigated to determine how well they are able to reduce eye dose under clinical conditions. Materials and Methods: The eye dose was measured using OSL nanodot dosimeters positioned on a Rando head phantom. The phantom was positioned next to an acrylic phantom to duplicate the position of an operator exposed to scattered x‐rays. Eye dose was measured with and without leaded eyewear in three different positions: head directed toward the scatter volume and angled 45 and 90 degrees. The eyewear investigated included standard style glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type A), sport‐wrap glasses with 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses (Type B) and a panorama shield with 0.07 mm lead equivalent acrylic lenses (Type C). Results: With the phantom head directed toward the scatter volume, the eye dose was reduced by 90%, 88% and 61% for Type A, B and C, respectively. Each value is lower than expected from the attenuation of the lenses alone, indicating backscatter is a significant contribution. At 90 degrees, eye protection dropped somewhat for Type A (75%), significantly for Type B (31%), while remaining the same for Type C (61%). The poor protection afforded by Type B at 90 degrees was primarily due to limited side coverage. Conclusion: Even though the lead equivalent thickness of Type C is much lower than other designs tested, increased side coverage resulted in nearly equivalent eye dose reduction when side exposure was predominant. The use of 0.75 mm lead equivalent lenses appears to have diminishing returns given that backscatter and side exposure are a significant source of eye exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993780146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993780146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182427

DO - 10.1118/1.3182427

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 2747

EP - 2748

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -