Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy

H. C. Wolfsen, R. A. Kozarek, T. J. Ball, D. J. Patterson, V. A. Botoman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

130 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and jejunostomy (PEJ) have supplanted their surgical counterparts in many institutions. Previous reports have claimed advantages in placing PEJ tubes because of reduced gastroesophageal reflux, prevention of aspiration, and improved tube anchoring distally. We reviewed the records of 191 patients who underwent placement of PEG/J tubes. Data collected included incidence of tube dysfunction, need for tube replacement or removal, and aspiration after PEG or PEJ tube placement. Tube dysfunction, defined as peritube leakage, plugging, fracture, or migration, occurred in 36% of patients over a mean follow-up period of 275 days and was significantly more common and likely to necessitate tube replacement in PEJ patients. Tube trade-out or removal and aspiration within a 30-day period after tube placement occurred in 28% and 10% of patients, respectively. These complications were significantly more common in PEJ patients than in PEG patients. Because of the increased incidence of tube dysfunction and the failure to prevent aspiration in predisposed patients, PEJ tube placement is not routinely indicated in patients requiring tube feedings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-263
Number of pages3
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume36
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Jejunostomy
Gastrostomy
Incidence
Enteral Nutrition
Gastroesophageal Reflux

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Wolfsen, H. C., Kozarek, R. A., Ball, T. J., Patterson, D. J., & Botoman, V. A. (1990). Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 36(3), 261-263.

Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. / Wolfsen, H. C.; Kozarek, R. A.; Ball, T. J.; Patterson, D. J.; Botoman, V. A.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1990, p. 261-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolfsen, HC, Kozarek, RA, Ball, TJ, Patterson, DJ & Botoman, VA 1990, 'Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 261-263.
Wolfsen HC, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Botoman VA. Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1990;36(3):261-263.
Wolfsen, H. C. ; Kozarek, R. A. ; Ball, T. J. ; Patterson, D. J. ; Botoman, V. A. / Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1990 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 261-263.
@article{01f04c061ef34b14869085a7543fa31d,
title = "Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy",
abstract = "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and jejunostomy (PEJ) have supplanted their surgical counterparts in many institutions. Previous reports have claimed advantages in placing PEJ tubes because of reduced gastroesophageal reflux, prevention of aspiration, and improved tube anchoring distally. We reviewed the records of 191 patients who underwent placement of PEG/J tubes. Data collected included incidence of tube dysfunction, need for tube replacement or removal, and aspiration after PEG or PEJ tube placement. Tube dysfunction, defined as peritube leakage, plugging, fracture, or migration, occurred in 36{\%} of patients over a mean follow-up period of 275 days and was significantly more common and likely to necessitate tube replacement in PEJ patients. Tube trade-out or removal and aspiration within a 30-day period after tube placement occurred in 28{\%} and 10{\%} of patients, respectively. These complications were significantly more common in PEJ patients than in PEG patients. Because of the increased incidence of tube dysfunction and the failure to prevent aspiration in predisposed patients, PEJ tube placement is not routinely indicated in patients requiring tube feedings.",
author = "Wolfsen, {H. C.} and Kozarek, {R. A.} and Ball, {T. J.} and Patterson, {D. J.} and Botoman, {V. A.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "261--263",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy

AU - Wolfsen, H. C.

AU - Kozarek, R. A.

AU - Ball, T. J.

AU - Patterson, D. J.

AU - Botoman, V. A.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and jejunostomy (PEJ) have supplanted their surgical counterparts in many institutions. Previous reports have claimed advantages in placing PEJ tubes because of reduced gastroesophageal reflux, prevention of aspiration, and improved tube anchoring distally. We reviewed the records of 191 patients who underwent placement of PEG/J tubes. Data collected included incidence of tube dysfunction, need for tube replacement or removal, and aspiration after PEG or PEJ tube placement. Tube dysfunction, defined as peritube leakage, plugging, fracture, or migration, occurred in 36% of patients over a mean follow-up period of 275 days and was significantly more common and likely to necessitate tube replacement in PEJ patients. Tube trade-out or removal and aspiration within a 30-day period after tube placement occurred in 28% and 10% of patients, respectively. These complications were significantly more common in PEJ patients than in PEG patients. Because of the increased incidence of tube dysfunction and the failure to prevent aspiration in predisposed patients, PEJ tube placement is not routinely indicated in patients requiring tube feedings.

AB - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and jejunostomy (PEJ) have supplanted their surgical counterparts in many institutions. Previous reports have claimed advantages in placing PEJ tubes because of reduced gastroesophageal reflux, prevention of aspiration, and improved tube anchoring distally. We reviewed the records of 191 patients who underwent placement of PEG/J tubes. Data collected included incidence of tube dysfunction, need for tube replacement or removal, and aspiration after PEG or PEJ tube placement. Tube dysfunction, defined as peritube leakage, plugging, fracture, or migration, occurred in 36% of patients over a mean follow-up period of 275 days and was significantly more common and likely to necessitate tube replacement in PEJ patients. Tube trade-out or removal and aspiration within a 30-day period after tube placement occurred in 28% and 10% of patients, respectively. These complications were significantly more common in PEJ patients than in PEG patients. Because of the increased incidence of tube dysfunction and the failure to prevent aspiration in predisposed patients, PEJ tube placement is not routinely indicated in patients requiring tube feedings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025300619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025300619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2114339

AN - SCOPUS:0025300619

VL - 36

SP - 261

EP - 263

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -