Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause

Alessandra J. Ainsworth, Sarah C. Baumgarten, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Celine M. Vachon, Amy L. Weaver, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. METHODS: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1247-1254
Number of pages8
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Volume133
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Tubal Sterilization
Menopause
Ovariectomy
Hysterectomy
Contraception
Gravidity
Menarche
Tobacco Use
Parity
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause. / Ainsworth, Alessandra J.; Baumgarten, Sarah C.; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N; Vachon, Celine M.; Weaver, Amy L.; Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K.

In: Obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 133, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 1247-1254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ainsworth, Alessandra J. ; Baumgarten, Sarah C. ; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N ; Vachon, Celine M. ; Weaver, Amy L. ; Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K. / Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause. In: Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 ; Vol. 133, No. 6. pp. 1247-1254.
@article{e113021df96643f68dafb3373a6bb0c8,
title = "Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. METHODS: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0{\%}, 25.5{\%}, and 25.0{\%}, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.",
author = "Ainsworth, {Alessandra J.} and Baumgarten, {Sarah C.} and Bakkum-Gamez, {Jamie N} and Vachon, {Celine M.} and Weaver, {Amy L.} and Laughlin-Tommaso, {Shannon K}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
pages = "1247--1254",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause

AU - Ainsworth, Alessandra J.

AU - Baumgarten, Sarah C.

AU - Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N

AU - Vachon, Celine M.

AU - Weaver, Amy L.

AU - Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. METHODS: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. METHODS: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066993257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066993257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 1247

EP - 1254

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 6

ER -