Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients

R. M. Jindal, G. Carpinito, D. Bernard, G. Schmitt, B. Idelson, P. Joshi, Albert Hakaim, S. I. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We carried out a trial to evaluate the complication rate of intravesical (LP) versus extravesical (Lich) ureteroneocystostomy in recipients of renal transplantation. Ureteric stenosis was the predominant complication in the LP technique, which was more difficult to correct. Complications by the Lich technique were urinary leaks, which were managed successfully by prolonged bladder drainage. We conclude that the Lich technique is simpler to perform and avoids the complication of ureteric stenosis, and should therefore be the procedure of choice for ureteric implantation in recipients of renal transplants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-398
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume8
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pathologic Constriction
Kidney
Kidney Transplantation
Drainage
Urinary Bladder
Transplant Recipients

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Leadbetter-Politano
  • Lich
  • Renal transplantation
  • Ureteroneocystostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Immunology

Cite this

Jindal, R. M., Carpinito, G., Bernard, D., Schmitt, G., Idelson, B., Joshi, P., ... Cho, S. I. (1994). Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients. Clinical Transplantation, 8(4), 396-398.

Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients. / Jindal, R. M.; Carpinito, G.; Bernard, D.; Schmitt, G.; Idelson, B.; Joshi, P.; Hakaim, Albert; Cho, S. I.

In: Clinical Transplantation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1994, p. 396-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jindal, RM, Carpinito, G, Bernard, D, Schmitt, G, Idelson, B, Joshi, P, Hakaim, A & Cho, SI 1994, 'Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients', Clinical Transplantation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 396-398.
Jindal RM, Carpinito G, Bernard D, Schmitt G, Idelson B, Joshi P et al. Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients. Clinical Transplantation. 1994;8(4):396-398.
Jindal, R. M. ; Carpinito, G. ; Bernard, D. ; Schmitt, G. ; Idelson, B. ; Joshi, P. ; Hakaim, Albert ; Cho, S. I. / Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients. In: Clinical Transplantation. 1994 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 396-398.
@article{d0c9aa6157c04ba590ff98c5cbca8b8d,
title = "Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients",
abstract = "We carried out a trial to evaluate the complication rate of intravesical (LP) versus extravesical (Lich) ureteroneocystostomy in recipients of renal transplantation. Ureteric stenosis was the predominant complication in the LP technique, which was more difficult to correct. Complications by the Lich technique were urinary leaks, which were managed successfully by prolonged bladder drainage. We conclude that the Lich technique is simpler to perform and avoids the complication of ureteric stenosis, and should therefore be the procedure of choice for ureteric implantation in recipients of renal transplants.",
keywords = "Complications, Leadbetter-Politano, Lich, Renal transplantation, Ureteroneocystostomy",
author = "Jindal, {R. M.} and G. Carpinito and D. Bernard and G. Schmitt and B. Idelson and P. Joshi and Albert Hakaim and Cho, {S. I.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "396--398",
journal = "Clinical Transplantation",
issn = "0902-0063",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplant recipients

AU - Jindal, R. M.

AU - Carpinito, G.

AU - Bernard, D.

AU - Schmitt, G.

AU - Idelson, B.

AU - Joshi, P.

AU - Hakaim, Albert

AU - Cho, S. I.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - We carried out a trial to evaluate the complication rate of intravesical (LP) versus extravesical (Lich) ureteroneocystostomy in recipients of renal transplantation. Ureteric stenosis was the predominant complication in the LP technique, which was more difficult to correct. Complications by the Lich technique were urinary leaks, which were managed successfully by prolonged bladder drainage. We conclude that the Lich technique is simpler to perform and avoids the complication of ureteric stenosis, and should therefore be the procedure of choice for ureteric implantation in recipients of renal transplants.

AB - We carried out a trial to evaluate the complication rate of intravesical (LP) versus extravesical (Lich) ureteroneocystostomy in recipients of renal transplantation. Ureteric stenosis was the predominant complication in the LP technique, which was more difficult to correct. Complications by the Lich technique were urinary leaks, which were managed successfully by prolonged bladder drainage. We conclude that the Lich technique is simpler to perform and avoids the complication of ureteric stenosis, and should therefore be the procedure of choice for ureteric implantation in recipients of renal transplants.

KW - Complications

KW - Leadbetter-Politano

KW - Lich

KW - Renal transplantation

KW - Ureteroneocystostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028017648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028017648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7949546

AN - SCOPUS:0028017648

VL - 8

SP - 396

EP - 398

JO - Clinical Transplantation

JF - Clinical Transplantation

SN - 0902-0063

IS - 4

ER -