Treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to idiopathic cricopharyngeal bar: Surgical cricopharyngeal muscle myotomy versus dilation

Alexander P. Marston, Francisco J. Maldonado, Karthik Ravi, Jan Kasperbauer, Dale C. Ekbom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare swallowing outcomes following cricopharyngeal (CP) dilation versus surgical myotomy in patients with dysphagia secondary to idiopathic CP bar. Methods All patients had an idiopathic CP bar without a history of Zenker's diverticulum, head and neck cancer, or systemic neurologic disease treated between 2000 and 2013. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) was utilized to assess dysphagia symptoms. Results Twenty-three patients underwent 46 dilations and 20 patients had a myotomy. Nineteen of 23 (83%) patients in the dilation group and all patients in the myotomy group reported improved swallow function. The median difference in pre- versus post-intervention FOSS scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.07) between the dilation and myotomy groups with mean reductions of 1.3 and 1.8, respectively. Seventeen of 23 (74%) dilation patients had persistent or recurrent dysphagia with 13 (57%) requiring repeat dilation and 4 (17%) undergoing CP myotomy. The median time to first reintervention in the dilation group was 13.6 months. Nineteen of 20 (95%) surgical myotomy patients did not experience recurrent dysphagia. Conclusion Both endoscopic CP dilation and myotomy led to similar initial improvement in swallow function for patients with primary idiopathic CP bar; however, dilation is more likely to provide temporary benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-512
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Deglutition Disorders
Dilatation
Muscles
Deglutition
Therapeutics
Zenker Diverticulum
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Nervous System Diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to idiopathic cricopharyngeal bar : Surgical cricopharyngeal muscle myotomy versus dilation. / Marston, Alexander P.; Maldonado, Francisco J.; Ravi, Karthik; Kasperbauer, Jan; Ekbom, Dale C.

In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 507-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{56ab49e636cc45728c270f9729a3d096,
title = "Treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to idiopathic cricopharyngeal bar: Surgical cricopharyngeal muscle myotomy versus dilation",
abstract = "Objective To compare swallowing outcomes following cricopharyngeal (CP) dilation versus surgical myotomy in patients with dysphagia secondary to idiopathic CP bar. Methods All patients had an idiopathic CP bar without a history of Zenker's diverticulum, head and neck cancer, or systemic neurologic disease treated between 2000 and 2013. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) was utilized to assess dysphagia symptoms. Results Twenty-three patients underwent 46 dilations and 20 patients had a myotomy. Nineteen of 23 (83{\%}) patients in the dilation group and all patients in the myotomy group reported improved swallow function. The median difference in pre- versus post-intervention FOSS scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.07) between the dilation and myotomy groups with mean reductions of 1.3 and 1.8, respectively. Seventeen of 23 (74{\%}) dilation patients had persistent or recurrent dysphagia with 13 (57{\%}) requiring repeat dilation and 4 (17{\%}) undergoing CP myotomy. The median time to first reintervention in the dilation group was 13.6 months. Nineteen of 20 (95{\%}) surgical myotomy patients did not experience recurrent dysphagia. Conclusion Both endoscopic CP dilation and myotomy led to similar initial improvement in swallow function for patients with primary idiopathic CP bar; however, dilation is more likely to provide temporary benefit.",
author = "Marston, {Alexander P.} and Maldonado, {Francisco J.} and Karthik Ravi and Jan Kasperbauer and Ekbom, {Dale C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.07.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "507--512",
journal = "American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery",
issn = "0196-0709",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to idiopathic cricopharyngeal bar

T2 - Surgical cricopharyngeal muscle myotomy versus dilation

AU - Marston, Alexander P.

AU - Maldonado, Francisco J.

AU - Ravi, Karthik

AU - Kasperbauer, Jan

AU - Ekbom, Dale C.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objective To compare swallowing outcomes following cricopharyngeal (CP) dilation versus surgical myotomy in patients with dysphagia secondary to idiopathic CP bar. Methods All patients had an idiopathic CP bar without a history of Zenker's diverticulum, head and neck cancer, or systemic neurologic disease treated between 2000 and 2013. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) was utilized to assess dysphagia symptoms. Results Twenty-three patients underwent 46 dilations and 20 patients had a myotomy. Nineteen of 23 (83%) patients in the dilation group and all patients in the myotomy group reported improved swallow function. The median difference in pre- versus post-intervention FOSS scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.07) between the dilation and myotomy groups with mean reductions of 1.3 and 1.8, respectively. Seventeen of 23 (74%) dilation patients had persistent or recurrent dysphagia with 13 (57%) requiring repeat dilation and 4 (17%) undergoing CP myotomy. The median time to first reintervention in the dilation group was 13.6 months. Nineteen of 20 (95%) surgical myotomy patients did not experience recurrent dysphagia. Conclusion Both endoscopic CP dilation and myotomy led to similar initial improvement in swallow function for patients with primary idiopathic CP bar; however, dilation is more likely to provide temporary benefit.

AB - Objective To compare swallowing outcomes following cricopharyngeal (CP) dilation versus surgical myotomy in patients with dysphagia secondary to idiopathic CP bar. Methods All patients had an idiopathic CP bar without a history of Zenker's diverticulum, head and neck cancer, or systemic neurologic disease treated between 2000 and 2013. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) was utilized to assess dysphagia symptoms. Results Twenty-three patients underwent 46 dilations and 20 patients had a myotomy. Nineteen of 23 (83%) patients in the dilation group and all patients in the myotomy group reported improved swallow function. The median difference in pre- versus post-intervention FOSS scores was not statistically significant (p = 0.07) between the dilation and myotomy groups with mean reductions of 1.3 and 1.8, respectively. Seventeen of 23 (74%) dilation patients had persistent or recurrent dysphagia with 13 (57%) requiring repeat dilation and 4 (17%) undergoing CP myotomy. The median time to first reintervention in the dilation group was 13.6 months. Nineteen of 20 (95%) surgical myotomy patients did not experience recurrent dysphagia. Conclusion Both endoscopic CP dilation and myotomy led to similar initial improvement in swallow function for patients with primary idiopathic CP bar; however, dilation is more likely to provide temporary benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994300078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994300078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.07.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 27522437

AN - SCOPUS:84994300078

VL - 37

SP - 507

EP - 512

JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

SN - 0196-0709

IS - 6

ER -