Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age

Jonathan M Holmes, Dennis M. Levi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although historically, treatment of amblyopia has been recommended prior to closure of a critical window in visual development, the existence and duration of that critical window is currently unclear. Moreover, there is clear evidence, both from animal and human studies of deprivation amblyopia, that there are different critical windows for different visual functions and that monocular and binocular deprivation have different neural and behavioral consequences. In view of the spectrum of critical windows for different visual functions and for different types of amblyopia, combined with individual variability in these windows, treatment of amblyopia has been increasingly offered to older children and adults. Nevertheless, treatment beyond the age of 7 years tends to be, on average, less effective than in younger children, and the high degree of variability in treatment response suggests that age is only one of many factors determining treatment response. Newly emerging treatment modalities may hold promise for more effective treatment of amblyopia at older ages. Additional studies are needed to characterize amblyopia by using new and existing clinical tests, leading to improved clinical classification and better prediction of treatment response. Attention also needs to be directed toward characterizing and measuring the impact of amblyopia on the patients' functional vision and health-related quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E015
JournalVisual Neuroscience
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Amblyopia
Therapeutics
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Binocular
  • Motor activity
  • Patching
  • Perceptual learning
  • Pharmacological treatment
  • Phenotyping
  • Videogames

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age. / Holmes, Jonathan M; Levi, Dennis M.

In: Visual Neuroscience, Vol. 35, 01.01.2018, p. E015.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Holmes, Jonathan M ; Levi, Dennis M. / Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age. In: Visual Neuroscience. 2018 ; Vol. 35. pp. E015.
@article{fb93cd9592d7468a916aa9d2abb247b0,
title = "Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age",
abstract = "Although historically, treatment of amblyopia has been recommended prior to closure of a critical window in visual development, the existence and duration of that critical window is currently unclear. Moreover, there is clear evidence, both from animal and human studies of deprivation amblyopia, that there are different critical windows for different visual functions and that monocular and binocular deprivation have different neural and behavioral consequences. In view of the spectrum of critical windows for different visual functions and for different types of amblyopia, combined with individual variability in these windows, treatment of amblyopia has been increasingly offered to older children and adults. Nevertheless, treatment beyond the age of 7 years tends to be, on average, less effective than in younger children, and the high degree of variability in treatment response suggests that age is only one of many factors determining treatment response. Newly emerging treatment modalities may hold promise for more effective treatment of amblyopia at older ages. Additional studies are needed to characterize amblyopia by using new and existing clinical tests, leading to improved clinical classification and better prediction of treatment response. Attention also needs to be directed toward characterizing and measuring the impact of amblyopia on the patients' functional vision and health-related quality of life.",
keywords = "Binocular, Motor activity, Patching, Perceptual learning, Pharmacological treatment, Phenotyping, Videogames",
author = "Holmes, {Jonathan M} and Levi, {Dennis M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0952523817000220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "E015",
journal = "Visual Neuroscience",
issn = "0952-5238",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age

AU - Holmes, Jonathan M

AU - Levi, Dennis M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Although historically, treatment of amblyopia has been recommended prior to closure of a critical window in visual development, the existence and duration of that critical window is currently unclear. Moreover, there is clear evidence, both from animal and human studies of deprivation amblyopia, that there are different critical windows for different visual functions and that monocular and binocular deprivation have different neural and behavioral consequences. In view of the spectrum of critical windows for different visual functions and for different types of amblyopia, combined with individual variability in these windows, treatment of amblyopia has been increasingly offered to older children and adults. Nevertheless, treatment beyond the age of 7 years tends to be, on average, less effective than in younger children, and the high degree of variability in treatment response suggests that age is only one of many factors determining treatment response. Newly emerging treatment modalities may hold promise for more effective treatment of amblyopia at older ages. Additional studies are needed to characterize amblyopia by using new and existing clinical tests, leading to improved clinical classification and better prediction of treatment response. Attention also needs to be directed toward characterizing and measuring the impact of amblyopia on the patients' functional vision and health-related quality of life.

AB - Although historically, treatment of amblyopia has been recommended prior to closure of a critical window in visual development, the existence and duration of that critical window is currently unclear. Moreover, there is clear evidence, both from animal and human studies of deprivation amblyopia, that there are different critical windows for different visual functions and that monocular and binocular deprivation have different neural and behavioral consequences. In view of the spectrum of critical windows for different visual functions and for different types of amblyopia, combined with individual variability in these windows, treatment of amblyopia has been increasingly offered to older children and adults. Nevertheless, treatment beyond the age of 7 years tends to be, on average, less effective than in younger children, and the high degree of variability in treatment response suggests that age is only one of many factors determining treatment response. Newly emerging treatment modalities may hold promise for more effective treatment of amblyopia at older ages. Additional studies are needed to characterize amblyopia by using new and existing clinical tests, leading to improved clinical classification and better prediction of treatment response. Attention also needs to be directed toward characterizing and measuring the impact of amblyopia on the patients' functional vision and health-related quality of life.

KW - Binocular

KW - Motor activity

KW - Patching

KW - Perceptual learning

KW - Pharmacological treatment

KW - Phenotyping

KW - Videogames

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041669013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041669013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0952523817000220

DO - 10.1017/S0952523817000220

M3 - Review article

VL - 35

SP - E015

JO - Visual Neuroscience

JF - Visual Neuroscience

SN - 0952-5238

ER -