Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM)

D. A. Axelrod, M. K. Guidinger, R. A. Metzger, R. H. Wiesner, R. L. Webb, R. M. Merion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Access to timely, risk-adjusted measures of transplant center outcomes is crucial for program quality improvement. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) has been proposed as a sensitive tool to detect persistent, clinically relevant changes in transplant center performance over time. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for adult kidney and liver transplants (1/97 to 12/01) were examined using logistic regression models to predict risk of graft failure (kidney) and death (liver) at 1 year. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts were constructed for each center and compared with results from the semi-annual method of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Transplant centers (N = 258) performed 59 650 kidney transplants, with a 9.2% 1-year graft failure rate. The CUSUM method identified centers with a period of significantly improving (N = 92) or declining (N = 52) performance. Transplant centers (N = 114) performed 18 277 liver transplants, with a 13.9% 1-year mortality rate. The CUSUM method demonstrated improving performance at 48 centers and declining performance at 24 centers. The CUSUM technique also identified the majority of centers flagged by the current OPTN method (20/22 kidney and 8/11 liver). CUSUM monitoring may be a useful technique for quality improvement, allowing center directors to identify clinically important, risk-adjusted changes in transplant center outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-323
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Transplants
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Liver
Organ Transplantation
Quality Improvement
Kidney
Logistic Models
Renal Insufficiency
Registries
Mortality

Keywords

  • Outcome analysis
  • Risk adjustment
  • Statistical process control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Axelrod, D. A., Guidinger, M. K., Metzger, R. A., Wiesner, R. H., Webb, R. L., & Merion, R. M. (2006). Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM). American Journal of Transplantation, 6(2), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01191.x

Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM). / Axelrod, D. A.; Guidinger, M. K.; Metzger, R. A.; Wiesner, R. H.; Webb, R. L.; Merion, R. M.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 313-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Axelrod, D. A. ; Guidinger, M. K. ; Metzger, R. A. ; Wiesner, R. H. ; Webb, R. L. ; Merion, R. M. / Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM). In: American Journal of Transplantation. 2006 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 313-323.
@article{871f74734215438a8f2638d15f44e595,
title = "Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM)",
abstract = "Access to timely, risk-adjusted measures of transplant center outcomes is crucial for program quality improvement. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) has been proposed as a sensitive tool to detect persistent, clinically relevant changes in transplant center performance over time. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for adult kidney and liver transplants (1/97 to 12/01) were examined using logistic regression models to predict risk of graft failure (kidney) and death (liver) at 1 year. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts were constructed for each center and compared with results from the semi-annual method of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Transplant centers (N = 258) performed 59 650 kidney transplants, with a 9.2{\%} 1-year graft failure rate. The CUSUM method identified centers with a period of significantly improving (N = 92) or declining (N = 52) performance. Transplant centers (N = 114) performed 18 277 liver transplants, with a 13.9{\%} 1-year mortality rate. The CUSUM method demonstrated improving performance at 48 centers and declining performance at 24 centers. The CUSUM technique also identified the majority of centers flagged by the current OPTN method (20/22 kidney and 8/11 liver). CUSUM monitoring may be a useful technique for quality improvement, allowing center directors to identify clinically important, risk-adjusted changes in transplant center outcome.",
keywords = "Outcome analysis, Risk adjustment, Statistical process control",
author = "Axelrod, {D. A.} and Guidinger, {M. K.} and Metzger, {R. A.} and Wiesner, {R. H.} and Webb, {R. L.} and Merion, {R. M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01191.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "313--323",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM)

AU - Axelrod, D. A.

AU - Guidinger, M. K.

AU - Metzger, R. A.

AU - Wiesner, R. H.

AU - Webb, R. L.

AU - Merion, R. M.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Access to timely, risk-adjusted measures of transplant center outcomes is crucial for program quality improvement. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) has been proposed as a sensitive tool to detect persistent, clinically relevant changes in transplant center performance over time. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for adult kidney and liver transplants (1/97 to 12/01) were examined using logistic regression models to predict risk of graft failure (kidney) and death (liver) at 1 year. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts were constructed for each center and compared with results from the semi-annual method of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Transplant centers (N = 258) performed 59 650 kidney transplants, with a 9.2% 1-year graft failure rate. The CUSUM method identified centers with a period of significantly improving (N = 92) or declining (N = 52) performance. Transplant centers (N = 114) performed 18 277 liver transplants, with a 13.9% 1-year mortality rate. The CUSUM method demonstrated improving performance at 48 centers and declining performance at 24 centers. The CUSUM technique also identified the majority of centers flagged by the current OPTN method (20/22 kidney and 8/11 liver). CUSUM monitoring may be a useful technique for quality improvement, allowing center directors to identify clinically important, risk-adjusted changes in transplant center outcome.

AB - Access to timely, risk-adjusted measures of transplant center outcomes is crucial for program quality improvement. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) has been proposed as a sensitive tool to detect persistent, clinically relevant changes in transplant center performance over time. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for adult kidney and liver transplants (1/97 to 12/01) were examined using logistic regression models to predict risk of graft failure (kidney) and death (liver) at 1 year. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts were constructed for each center and compared with results from the semi-annual method of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Transplant centers (N = 258) performed 59 650 kidney transplants, with a 9.2% 1-year graft failure rate. The CUSUM method identified centers with a period of significantly improving (N = 92) or declining (N = 52) performance. Transplant centers (N = 114) performed 18 277 liver transplants, with a 13.9% 1-year mortality rate. The CUSUM method demonstrated improving performance at 48 centers and declining performance at 24 centers. The CUSUM technique also identified the majority of centers flagged by the current OPTN method (20/22 kidney and 8/11 liver). CUSUM monitoring may be a useful technique for quality improvement, allowing center directors to identify clinically important, risk-adjusted changes in transplant center outcome.

KW - Outcome analysis

KW - Risk adjustment

KW - Statistical process control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644894448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644894448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01191.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01191.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16426315

AN - SCOPUS:33644894448

VL - 6

SP - 313

EP - 323

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 2

ER -