TY - JOUR
T1 - Transoral surgery (TOS) in oropharyngeal cancer
T2 - Different tools, a single mini-invasive philosophy
AU - Tirelli, Giancarlo
AU - Boscolo Nata, Francesca
AU - Piovesana, Marco
AU - Quatela, Eliana
AU - Gardenal, Nicoletta
AU - Hayden, Richard E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Surgery with or without adjuvant therapy and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy have traditionally represented the possible treatment options for oropharyngeal cancer. The adverse effects of non-surgical treatments and recent technical innovations have prompted a new interest in the surgical approach. However, in parallel to the possibility of achieving radical cancer clearance, we should remember the impact that traditional open surgery has on the patient's cosmesis, functionality and quality of life. As a result, transoral surgery is an attractive option for oropharyngeal tumors. The term “transoral surgery” only indicates that the tumor is accessed and resected via the oral cavity, but the surgeon can choose among different resection methods, such as transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery, transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery, endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery, and transoral ultrasound surgery. The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature on the transoral treatment of oropharyngeal cancer, to standardize the terminology of transoral procedures, analyzing the common aspects, main differences and future perspectives of the various forms of transoral surgery.
AB - Surgery with or without adjuvant therapy and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy have traditionally represented the possible treatment options for oropharyngeal cancer. The adverse effects of non-surgical treatments and recent technical innovations have prompted a new interest in the surgical approach. However, in parallel to the possibility of achieving radical cancer clearance, we should remember the impact that traditional open surgery has on the patient's cosmesis, functionality and quality of life. As a result, transoral surgery is an attractive option for oropharyngeal tumors. The term “transoral surgery” only indicates that the tumor is accessed and resected via the oral cavity, but the surgeon can choose among different resection methods, such as transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery, transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery, endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery, and transoral ultrasound surgery. The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature on the transoral treatment of oropharyngeal cancer, to standardize the terminology of transoral procedures, analyzing the common aspects, main differences and future perspectives of the various forms of transoral surgery.
KW - Oropharyngeal cancer
KW - Transoral laser microsurgery
KW - Transoral robotic surgery
KW - Transoral surgery
KW - Transoral ultrasound surgery
KW - Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052210467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052210467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.08.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30449487
AN - SCOPUS:85052210467
SN - 0960-7404
VL - 27
SP - 643
EP - 649
JO - Surgical Oncology
JF - Surgical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -