TY - JOUR
T1 - Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care
T2 - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
AU - LeBlanc, Annie
AU - Bodde, Amy E.
AU - Branda, Megan E.
AU - Yost, Kathleen J.
AU - Herrin, Jeph
AU - Williams, Mark D.
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Van Houten, Holly
AU - Ruud, Kari L.
AU - Pencille, Laurie J.
AU - Montori, Victor M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is funded by the iADAPT-1 R18 HS019214 grant from the AHRQ under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The funding source had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data or decision to submit results.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 LeBlanc et al.
PY - 2013/5/7
Y1 - 2013/5/7
N2 - Background: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) documents important differences in antidepressants in terms of efficacy, safety, cost, and burden to the patient. Decision aids can adapt this evidence to help patients participate in making informed choices. In turn, antidepressant therapy will more likely reflect patients' values and context, leading to improved adherence and mood outcomes. Methods/Design: The objective of this study is to develop the Depression Medication Choice decision aid for use during primary care encounters, and to test its efficacy by conducting a clustered practical randomized trial comparing the decision aid to usual depression care in primary care practices. We will use a novel practice-based, patient-centered approach based on participatory action research that involves a multidisciplinary team of designers, investigators, clinicians, patient representatives, and other stakeholders for the development of the decision aid. We will then conduct a clustered practical randomized trial enrolling clinicians and their patients (n = 300) with moderate to severe depression from rural, suburban and inner city primary care practices (n = 10). The intervention will consist of the use of the depression medication choice decision aid during the clinical encounter. This trial will generate preliminary evidence of the relative impact of the decision aid on patient involvement in decision making, decision making quality, patient knowledge, and 6-month measures of medication adherence and mental health compared to usual depression care. Discussion: Upon completion of the proposed research, we will have developed and evaluated the efficacy of the decision aid depression medication choice as a novel translational tool for CER in depression treatment, engaged patients with depression in their care, and refined the process by which we conduct practice-based trials with limited research footprint.
AB - Background: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) documents important differences in antidepressants in terms of efficacy, safety, cost, and burden to the patient. Decision aids can adapt this evidence to help patients participate in making informed choices. In turn, antidepressant therapy will more likely reflect patients' values and context, leading to improved adherence and mood outcomes. Methods/Design: The objective of this study is to develop the Depression Medication Choice decision aid for use during primary care encounters, and to test its efficacy by conducting a clustered practical randomized trial comparing the decision aid to usual depression care in primary care practices. We will use a novel practice-based, patient-centered approach based on participatory action research that involves a multidisciplinary team of designers, investigators, clinicians, patient representatives, and other stakeholders for the development of the decision aid. We will then conduct a clustered practical randomized trial enrolling clinicians and their patients (n = 300) with moderate to severe depression from rural, suburban and inner city primary care practices (n = 10). The intervention will consist of the use of the depression medication choice decision aid during the clinical encounter. This trial will generate preliminary evidence of the relative impact of the decision aid on patient involvement in decision making, decision making quality, patient knowledge, and 6-month measures of medication adherence and mental health compared to usual depression care. Discussion: Upon completion of the proposed research, we will have developed and evaluated the efficacy of the decision aid depression medication choice as a novel translational tool for CER in depression treatment, engaged patients with depression in their care, and refined the process by which we conduct practice-based trials with limited research footprint.
KW - Comparative effectiveness research
KW - Decision aid
KW - Depression
KW - Implementation
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888146113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888146113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-127
DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-127
M3 - Article
C2 - 23782672
AN - SCOPUS:84888146113
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 14
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 127
ER -