Transition of care for inpatient hematology patients receiving chemotherapy: Development of hospital discharge huddle process and effects of implementation

Rahma Warsame, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Jose (J.C.) Villasboas Bisneto, DeWayne Gallenberg, Robert Wolf, James Ward, Natasha Matt-Hensrud, Kimberly Grethen, Lisa Colborn, Steven Zeldenrust, Martha Lacy, Carrie A Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a care model to decrease incidence of preventable errors in the complex multidisciplinary care of hematology inpatients at the time of discharge. Methods: An interactive, multidisciplinary, structured discharge process was developed. Multiple focus groups were held to establish the strengths and gaps. A checklist was created for common follow-up needs. Outcomes measured included: dexamethasone received at discharge, antiemetics prescribed, hospital readmissions, number of patient telephone calls received postdischarge, chemotherapy letters created, pegfilgrastim arranged, and peripherally inserted catheter care arranged. Using a pre-post study design, we compared outcomes of patients after the checklist was implemented in June 2014 (n = 41) with a historical cohort of patients admitted to hematology for chemotherapy 1 year earlier in June 2013 (n = 42). Results: Compared with the historical data, improvement was noted for all checklist items except number of hospital readmissions and number of nursing telephone calls. In June 2014, 100% of patients received pegfilgrastim, compared with 88% in June 2013 (P = .02). Antiemetic prescriptions after chemotherapy improved from 40% (June 2013) to 70% (June 2014; P 5 .004). Two areas did not show improvement: number of readmissions (12 v 21; P 5 .26) and number of telephone calls after discharge (nine each for June 2013 and 2014; P = 1.0). Conclusion: There was significant decrease in preventable errors demonstrated after implementation of our care model. Developing a systematic approach to hospital discharges can lead to improvements and serve a model for other inpatient wards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e88-e94
JournalJournal of Oncology Practice
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Hematology
Inpatients
Checklist
Telephone
Drug Therapy
Patient Readmission
Antiemetics
Focus Groups
Dexamethasone
Prescriptions
Nursing
Catheters
Incidence
pegfilgrastim

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Transition of care for inpatient hematology patients receiving chemotherapy : Development of hospital discharge huddle process and effects of implementation. / Warsame, Rahma; Kasi, Pashtoon M.; Villasboas Bisneto, Jose (J.C.); Gallenberg, DeWayne; Wolf, Robert; Ward, James; Matt-Hensrud, Natasha; Grethen, Kimberly; Colborn, Lisa; Zeldenrust, Steven; Lacy, Martha; Thompson, Carrie A.

In: Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. e88-e94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Warsame, Rahma ; Kasi, Pashtoon M. ; Villasboas Bisneto, Jose (J.C.) ; Gallenberg, DeWayne ; Wolf, Robert ; Ward, James ; Matt-Hensrud, Natasha ; Grethen, Kimberly ; Colborn, Lisa ; Zeldenrust, Steven ; Lacy, Martha ; Thompson, Carrie A. / Transition of care for inpatient hematology patients receiving chemotherapy : Development of hospital discharge huddle process and effects of implementation. In: Journal of Oncology Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. e88-e94.
@article{2c08e7506ed14982949a18fe6f537867,
title = "Transition of care for inpatient hematology patients receiving chemotherapy: Development of hospital discharge huddle process and effects of implementation",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop a care model to decrease incidence of preventable errors in the complex multidisciplinary care of hematology inpatients at the time of discharge. Methods: An interactive, multidisciplinary, structured discharge process was developed. Multiple focus groups were held to establish the strengths and gaps. A checklist was created for common follow-up needs. Outcomes measured included: dexamethasone received at discharge, antiemetics prescribed, hospital readmissions, number of patient telephone calls received postdischarge, chemotherapy letters created, pegfilgrastim arranged, and peripherally inserted catheter care arranged. Using a pre-post study design, we compared outcomes of patients after the checklist was implemented in June 2014 (n = 41) with a historical cohort of patients admitted to hematology for chemotherapy 1 year earlier in June 2013 (n = 42). Results: Compared with the historical data, improvement was noted for all checklist items except number of hospital readmissions and number of nursing telephone calls. In June 2014, 100{\%} of patients received pegfilgrastim, compared with 88{\%} in June 2013 (P = .02). Antiemetic prescriptions after chemotherapy improved from 40{\%} (June 2013) to 70{\%} (June 2014; P 5 .004). Two areas did not show improvement: number of readmissions (12 v 21; P 5 .26) and number of telephone calls after discharge (nine each for June 2013 and 2014; P = 1.0). Conclusion: There was significant decrease in preventable errors demonstrated after implementation of our care model. Developing a systematic approach to hospital discharges can lead to improvements and serve a model for other inpatient wards.",
author = "Rahma Warsame and Kasi, {Pashtoon M.} and {Villasboas Bisneto}, {Jose (J.C.)} and DeWayne Gallenberg and Robert Wolf and James Ward and Natasha Matt-Hensrud and Kimberly Grethen and Lisa Colborn and Steven Zeldenrust and Martha Lacy and Thompson, {Carrie A}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JOP.2015.005785",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "e88--e94",
journal = "Journal of Oncology Practice",
issn = "1554-7477",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transition of care for inpatient hematology patients receiving chemotherapy

T2 - Development of hospital discharge huddle process and effects of implementation

AU - Warsame, Rahma

AU - Kasi, Pashtoon M.

AU - Villasboas Bisneto, Jose (J.C.)

AU - Gallenberg, DeWayne

AU - Wolf, Robert

AU - Ward, James

AU - Matt-Hensrud, Natasha

AU - Grethen, Kimberly

AU - Colborn, Lisa

AU - Zeldenrust, Steven

AU - Lacy, Martha

AU - Thompson, Carrie A

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To develop a care model to decrease incidence of preventable errors in the complex multidisciplinary care of hematology inpatients at the time of discharge. Methods: An interactive, multidisciplinary, structured discharge process was developed. Multiple focus groups were held to establish the strengths and gaps. A checklist was created for common follow-up needs. Outcomes measured included: dexamethasone received at discharge, antiemetics prescribed, hospital readmissions, number of patient telephone calls received postdischarge, chemotherapy letters created, pegfilgrastim arranged, and peripherally inserted catheter care arranged. Using a pre-post study design, we compared outcomes of patients after the checklist was implemented in June 2014 (n = 41) with a historical cohort of patients admitted to hematology for chemotherapy 1 year earlier in June 2013 (n = 42). Results: Compared with the historical data, improvement was noted for all checklist items except number of hospital readmissions and number of nursing telephone calls. In June 2014, 100% of patients received pegfilgrastim, compared with 88% in June 2013 (P = .02). Antiemetic prescriptions after chemotherapy improved from 40% (June 2013) to 70% (June 2014; P 5 .004). Two areas did not show improvement: number of readmissions (12 v 21; P 5 .26) and number of telephone calls after discharge (nine each for June 2013 and 2014; P = 1.0). Conclusion: There was significant decrease in preventable errors demonstrated after implementation of our care model. Developing a systematic approach to hospital discharges can lead to improvements and serve a model for other inpatient wards.

AB - Purpose: To develop a care model to decrease incidence of preventable errors in the complex multidisciplinary care of hematology inpatients at the time of discharge. Methods: An interactive, multidisciplinary, structured discharge process was developed. Multiple focus groups were held to establish the strengths and gaps. A checklist was created for common follow-up needs. Outcomes measured included: dexamethasone received at discharge, antiemetics prescribed, hospital readmissions, number of patient telephone calls received postdischarge, chemotherapy letters created, pegfilgrastim arranged, and peripherally inserted catheter care arranged. Using a pre-post study design, we compared outcomes of patients after the checklist was implemented in June 2014 (n = 41) with a historical cohort of patients admitted to hematology for chemotherapy 1 year earlier in June 2013 (n = 42). Results: Compared with the historical data, improvement was noted for all checklist items except number of hospital readmissions and number of nursing telephone calls. In June 2014, 100% of patients received pegfilgrastim, compared with 88% in June 2013 (P = .02). Antiemetic prescriptions after chemotherapy improved from 40% (June 2013) to 70% (June 2014; P 5 .004). Two areas did not show improvement: number of readmissions (12 v 21; P 5 .26) and number of telephone calls after discharge (nine each for June 2013 and 2014; P = 1.0). Conclusion: There was significant decrease in preventable errors demonstrated after implementation of our care model. Developing a systematic approach to hospital discharges can lead to improvements and serve a model for other inpatient wards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958582101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958582101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2015.005785

DO - 10.1200/JOP.2015.005785

M3 - Article

C2 - 26374861

AN - SCOPUS:84958582101

VL - 12

SP - e88-e94

JO - Journal of Oncology Practice

JF - Journal of Oncology Practice

SN - 1554-7477

IS - 1

ER -