Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection

Anna M. Buchner, Muhammad W. Shahid, Michael G. Heckman, Nancy N. Diehl, Rebecca B. McNeil, Patrick Cleveland, Kanwar R. Gill, Anthony Schore, Marwan Ghabril, Massimo Raimondo, Seth A. Gross, Michael B. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous studies examining the effect of fellow participation on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy have yielded conflicting results, and factors such as adenoma size and location have not been rigorously evaluated. Objective: To examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy affects overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 2430 colonoscopies performed in our ambulatory surgical center between September 2006 and December 2007, comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates of colonoscopies performed by fellows with supervising staff endoscopists (n = 318) with colonoscopies performed by staff endoscopists without fellow participation (n = 2112). Study participants included patients who underwent screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies in our GI suite. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of fellow participation with adenoma and polyp detection. Results: There was evidence of a higher rate of small (<5 mm) adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present (25% vs 17%, P = .001). This remained significant after multiple-testing adjustment (P ≤ .003 considered significant). Findings were similar, although not significant for small polyps (36% vs 29%, P = .007). There was a trend toward increased adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present compared with those without (30% vs 26%, P = .11). Multivariable adjustment for potentially confounding variables did not alter these associations. Limitations: The study had a retrospective design, and information regarding bowel preparation was not available for 37% of patients. Conclusion: Fellow involvement was associated with increased detection rates of small adenomas, providing evidence that the presence of a fellow during colonoscopy plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of the examination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1223-1231
Number of pages9
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Adenoma
Polyps
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Buchner, A. M., Shahid, M. W., Heckman, M. G., Diehl, N. N., McNeil, R. B., Cleveland, P., ... Wallace, M. B. (2011). Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 73(6), 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060

Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. / Buchner, Anna M.; Shahid, Muhammad W.; Heckman, Michael G.; Diehl, Nancy N.; McNeil, Rebecca B.; Cleveland, Patrick; Gill, Kanwar R.; Schore, Anthony; Ghabril, Marwan; Raimondo, Massimo; Gross, Seth A.; Wallace, Michael B.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 73, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 1223-1231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buchner, AM, Shahid, MW, Heckman, MG, Diehl, NN, McNeil, RB, Cleveland, P, Gill, KR, Schore, A, Ghabril, M, Raimondo, M, Gross, SA & Wallace, MB 2011, 'Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060
Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, McNeil RB, Cleveland P et al. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 Jun;73(6):1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060
Buchner, Anna M. ; Shahid, Muhammad W. ; Heckman, Michael G. ; Diehl, Nancy N. ; McNeil, Rebecca B. ; Cleveland, Patrick ; Gill, Kanwar R. ; Schore, Anthony ; Ghabril, Marwan ; Raimondo, Massimo ; Gross, Seth A. ; Wallace, Michael B. / Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. 1223-1231.
@article{eb57778fcdc64039bbc2755781d2579b,
title = "Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection",
abstract = "Background: Previous studies examining the effect of fellow participation on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy have yielded conflicting results, and factors such as adenoma size and location have not been rigorously evaluated. Objective: To examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy affects overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 2430 colonoscopies performed in our ambulatory surgical center between September 2006 and December 2007, comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates of colonoscopies performed by fellows with supervising staff endoscopists (n = 318) with colonoscopies performed by staff endoscopists without fellow participation (n = 2112). Study participants included patients who underwent screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies in our GI suite. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of fellow participation with adenoma and polyp detection. Results: There was evidence of a higher rate of small (<5 mm) adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present (25{\%} vs 17{\%}, P = .001). This remained significant after multiple-testing adjustment (P ≤ .003 considered significant). Findings were similar, although not significant for small polyps (36{\%} vs 29{\%}, P = .007). There was a trend toward increased adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present compared with those without (30{\%} vs 26{\%}, P = .11). Multivariable adjustment for potentially confounding variables did not alter these associations. Limitations: The study had a retrospective design, and information regarding bowel preparation was not available for 37{\%} of patients. Conclusion: Fellow involvement was associated with increased detection rates of small adenomas, providing evidence that the presence of a fellow during colonoscopy plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of the examination.",
author = "Buchner, {Anna M.} and Shahid, {Muhammad W.} and Heckman, {Michael G.} and Diehl, {Nancy N.} and McNeil, {Rebecca B.} and Patrick Cleveland and Gill, {Kanwar R.} and Anthony Schore and Marwan Ghabril and Massimo Raimondo and Gross, {Seth A.} and Wallace, {Michael B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1223--1231",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection

AU - Buchner, Anna M.

AU - Shahid, Muhammad W.

AU - Heckman, Michael G.

AU - Diehl, Nancy N.

AU - McNeil, Rebecca B.

AU - Cleveland, Patrick

AU - Gill, Kanwar R.

AU - Schore, Anthony

AU - Ghabril, Marwan

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

AU - Gross, Seth A.

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Background: Previous studies examining the effect of fellow participation on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy have yielded conflicting results, and factors such as adenoma size and location have not been rigorously evaluated. Objective: To examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy affects overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 2430 colonoscopies performed in our ambulatory surgical center between September 2006 and December 2007, comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates of colonoscopies performed by fellows with supervising staff endoscopists (n = 318) with colonoscopies performed by staff endoscopists without fellow participation (n = 2112). Study participants included patients who underwent screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies in our GI suite. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of fellow participation with adenoma and polyp detection. Results: There was evidence of a higher rate of small (<5 mm) adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present (25% vs 17%, P = .001). This remained significant after multiple-testing adjustment (P ≤ .003 considered significant). Findings were similar, although not significant for small polyps (36% vs 29%, P = .007). There was a trend toward increased adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present compared with those without (30% vs 26%, P = .11). Multivariable adjustment for potentially confounding variables did not alter these associations. Limitations: The study had a retrospective design, and information regarding bowel preparation was not available for 37% of patients. Conclusion: Fellow involvement was associated with increased detection rates of small adenomas, providing evidence that the presence of a fellow during colonoscopy plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of the examination.

AB - Background: Previous studies examining the effect of fellow participation on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy have yielded conflicting results, and factors such as adenoma size and location have not been rigorously evaluated. Objective: To examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy affects overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 2430 colonoscopies performed in our ambulatory surgical center between September 2006 and December 2007, comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates of colonoscopies performed by fellows with supervising staff endoscopists (n = 318) with colonoscopies performed by staff endoscopists without fellow participation (n = 2112). Study participants included patients who underwent screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies in our GI suite. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of fellow participation with adenoma and polyp detection. Results: There was evidence of a higher rate of small (<5 mm) adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present (25% vs 17%, P = .001). This remained significant after multiple-testing adjustment (P ≤ .003 considered significant). Findings were similar, although not significant for small polyps (36% vs 29%, P = .007). There was a trend toward increased adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present compared with those without (30% vs 26%, P = .11). Multivariable adjustment for potentially confounding variables did not alter these associations. Limitations: The study had a retrospective design, and information regarding bowel preparation was not available for 37% of patients. Conclusion: Fellow involvement was associated with increased detection rates of small adenomas, providing evidence that the presence of a fellow during colonoscopy plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of the examination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957866262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957866262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060

M3 - Article

C2 - 21481861

AN - SCOPUS:79957866262

VL - 73

SP - 1223

EP - 1231

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -