Tissue prothrombin: Universal distribution in smooth muscle

Robert D. McBane, Randall S. Miller, Nancy L. Hassinger, James H. Chesebro, Yale Nemerson, Whyte G. Owen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Immunohistochemical analysis of surgically obtained porcine tissue samples reveals ubiquitous staining for prothrombin in organs rich in smooth muscle content and universal staining of smooth muscle in tissue vasculature. The native character of tissue prothrombin is verified first by chromogenic substrate hydrolysis and hirudin inhibition alter incubation of tissue extracts with taipan snake venom and phospholipid. Western analysis of tissue extracts confirms the native zymogen molecular weight. In addition, prothrombin purified in good yield from porcine uterus is activated by Echis carinatus venom which, like taipan venom, is 4-carboxyglutamic acid- sensitive. After correction for blood (gross heme) and interstitial fluid (albumin), excess functional prothrombin is observed in extracts of tissues having abundant smooth muscle. In contrast with factor X, the yield of prothrombin purified from porcine uterus greatly exceeds that attributable to contamination by whole blood. Northern blot analysis from selected bovine tissues extracted for polyadenylated messenger RNA is equivocal for prothrombin mRNA with the exception of liver, which is positive. It is concluded that functionally intact prothrombin is widely distributed among tissues owing to smooth muscle content, although the mechanism of emplacement and physiologic significance of prothrombin in these tissues remains unclear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2430-2436
Number of pages7
JournalArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology
Volume17
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Keywords

  • Artery
  • Prothrombin
  • Smooth muscle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tissue prothrombin: Universal distribution in smooth muscle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this