Time of Onset and Predictors of Biphasic Anaphylactic Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sangil Lee, Fernanda Bellolio, Erik P. Hess, Patricia Erwin, Mohammad H Murad, Ronna L. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A biphasic reaction is a potentially life-threatening recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution of anaphylaxis without re-exposure to the trigger. The infrequent nature of these reactions has made them difficult to study and predict. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and predictors of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Method: Original research studies that described biphasic reactions in case series or cohort studies were included. Studies that did not describe biphasic reactions and case series with less than 2 biphasic reactions were excluded. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2014 and bibliographies of included articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Inconsistency among studies was assessed with the I2 statistic. Results: Twenty-seven observational studies that enrolled 4114 patients with anaphylaxis and 192 patients with biphasic reactions were included. The median time of symptom onset was 11 (range 0.2 to 72.0) hours. Food as the inciting trigger was associated with decreased risk (pooled OR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.94, I2 = 0%) and an unknown inciting trigger with increased risk (pooled OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.95, I2 = 61%). Initial presentation with hypotension (pooled OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.15, I2 = 79%) was also associated with the development of a biphasic reaction. Conclusion: Biphasic anaphylatic reactions were less likely among patients with food as an inciting trigger. Patients who present with hypotension or have an unknown inciting trigger may be at increased risk of a biphasic reaction. Clinicians should tailor observation periods for patients individually based on clinical characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)408-416.e1
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Anaphylaxis
Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Hypotension
Food
Information Storage and Retrieval
Bibliography
MEDLINE
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Observation
Recurrence
Research

Keywords

  • Anaphylaxis
  • Biphasic reactions
  • Hypotension
  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Time of Onset and Predictors of Biphasic Anaphylactic Reactions : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. / Lee, Sangil; Bellolio, Fernanda; Hess, Erik P.; Erwin, Patricia; Murad, Mohammad H; Campbell, Ronna L.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, p. 408-416.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63d61ca38c6d4687b58e40469956b484,
title = "Time of Onset and Predictors of Biphasic Anaphylactic Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: A biphasic reaction is a potentially life-threatening recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution of anaphylaxis without re-exposure to the trigger. The infrequent nature of these reactions has made them difficult to study and predict. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and predictors of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Method: Original research studies that described biphasic reactions in case series or cohort studies were included. Studies that did not describe biphasic reactions and case series with less than 2 biphasic reactions were excluded. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2014 and bibliographies of included articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Inconsistency among studies was assessed with the I2 statistic. Results: Twenty-seven observational studies that enrolled 4114 patients with anaphylaxis and 192 patients with biphasic reactions were included. The median time of symptom onset was 11 (range 0.2 to 72.0) hours. Food as the inciting trigger was associated with decreased risk (pooled OR 0.62, 95{\%} CI: 0.4 to 0.94, I2 = 0{\%}) and an unknown inciting trigger with increased risk (pooled OR 1.72, 95{\%} CI: 1.0 to 2.95, I2 = 61{\%}). Initial presentation with hypotension (pooled OR 2.18, 95{\%} CI: 1.14 to 4.15, I2 = 79{\%}) was also associated with the development of a biphasic reaction. Conclusion: Biphasic anaphylatic reactions were less likely among patients with food as an inciting trigger. Patients who present with hypotension or have an unknown inciting trigger may be at increased risk of a biphasic reaction. Clinicians should tailor observation periods for patients individually based on clinical characteristics.",
keywords = "Anaphylaxis, Biphasic reactions, Hypotension, Meta-analysis, Systematic review",
author = "Sangil Lee and Fernanda Bellolio and Hess, {Erik P.} and Patricia Erwin and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Campbell, {Ronna L.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaip.2014.12.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "408--416.e1",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice",
issn = "2213-2198",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time of Onset and Predictors of Biphasic Anaphylactic Reactions

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AU - Lee, Sangil

AU - Bellolio, Fernanda

AU - Hess, Erik P.

AU - Erwin, Patricia

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Campbell, Ronna L.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: A biphasic reaction is a potentially life-threatening recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution of anaphylaxis without re-exposure to the trigger. The infrequent nature of these reactions has made them difficult to study and predict. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and predictors of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Method: Original research studies that described biphasic reactions in case series or cohort studies were included. Studies that did not describe biphasic reactions and case series with less than 2 biphasic reactions were excluded. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2014 and bibliographies of included articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Inconsistency among studies was assessed with the I2 statistic. Results: Twenty-seven observational studies that enrolled 4114 patients with anaphylaxis and 192 patients with biphasic reactions were included. The median time of symptom onset was 11 (range 0.2 to 72.0) hours. Food as the inciting trigger was associated with decreased risk (pooled OR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.94, I2 = 0%) and an unknown inciting trigger with increased risk (pooled OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.95, I2 = 61%). Initial presentation with hypotension (pooled OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.15, I2 = 79%) was also associated with the development of a biphasic reaction. Conclusion: Biphasic anaphylatic reactions were less likely among patients with food as an inciting trigger. Patients who present with hypotension or have an unknown inciting trigger may be at increased risk of a biphasic reaction. Clinicians should tailor observation periods for patients individually based on clinical characteristics.

AB - Background: A biphasic reaction is a potentially life-threatening recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution of anaphylaxis without re-exposure to the trigger. The infrequent nature of these reactions has made them difficult to study and predict. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and predictors of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Method: Original research studies that described biphasic reactions in case series or cohort studies were included. Studies that did not describe biphasic reactions and case series with less than 2 biphasic reactions were excluded. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2014 and bibliographies of included articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Inconsistency among studies was assessed with the I2 statistic. Results: Twenty-seven observational studies that enrolled 4114 patients with anaphylaxis and 192 patients with biphasic reactions were included. The median time of symptom onset was 11 (range 0.2 to 72.0) hours. Food as the inciting trigger was associated with decreased risk (pooled OR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.94, I2 = 0%) and an unknown inciting trigger with increased risk (pooled OR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.95, I2 = 61%). Initial presentation with hypotension (pooled OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.15, I2 = 79%) was also associated with the development of a biphasic reaction. Conclusion: Biphasic anaphylatic reactions were less likely among patients with food as an inciting trigger. Patients who present with hypotension or have an unknown inciting trigger may be at increased risk of a biphasic reaction. Clinicians should tailor observation periods for patients individually based on clinical characteristics.

KW - Anaphylaxis

KW - Biphasic reactions

KW - Hypotension

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940718567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940718567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.12.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25680923

AN - SCOPUS:84940718567

VL - 3

SP - 408-416.e1

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice

SN - 2213-2198

IS - 3

ER -