TY - JOUR
T1 - Time and learning efficiency in Internet-based learning
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Cook, David A.
AU - Levinson, Anthony J.
AU - Garside, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors thank Denise M. Dupras, MD, PhD, Patricia J. Erwin, MLS, and Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc for their role in study identification and data abstraction. This work was supported by intramural funds and a Mayo Foundation Education Innovation award. Dr. Levinson is supported in part through the John R. Evans Chair in Health Sciences Education Research. Dr. Cook had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Authors have claimed that Internet-based instruction promotes greater learning efficiency than non-computer methods. Objectives Determine, through a systematic synthesis of evidence in health professions education, how Internet-based instruction compares with non-computer instruction in time spent learning, and what features of Internet-based instruction are associated with improved learning efficiency. Data sources We searched databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC from 1990 through November 2008. Study selection and data abstraction We included all studies quantifying learning time for Internet-based instruction for health professionals, compared with other instruction. Reviewers worked independently, in duplicate, to abstract information on interventions, outcomes, and study design. Results We identified 20 eligible studies. Random effects meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing Internet-based with non-Internet instruction (positive numbers indicating Internet longer) revealed pooled effect size (ES) for time -0.10 (p = 0.63). Among comparisons of two Internet-based interventions, providing feedback adds time (ES 0.67, p = 0.003, two studies), and greater interactivity generally takes longer (ES 0.25, p = 0.089, five studies). One study demonstrated that adapting to learner prior knowledge saves time without significantly affecting knowledge scores. Other studies revealed that audio narration, video clips, interactive models, and animations increase learning time but also facilitate higher knowledge and/or satisfaction. Across all studies, time correlated positively with knowledge outcomes (r = 0.53, p = 0.021). Conclusions On average, Internet-based instruction and non-computer instruction require similar time. Instructional strategies to enhance feedback and interactivity typically prolong learning time, but in many cases also enhance learning outcomes. Isolated examples suggest potential for improving efficiency in Internet-based instruction.
AB - Authors have claimed that Internet-based instruction promotes greater learning efficiency than non-computer methods. Objectives Determine, through a systematic synthesis of evidence in health professions education, how Internet-based instruction compares with non-computer instruction in time spent learning, and what features of Internet-based instruction are associated with improved learning efficiency. Data sources We searched databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC from 1990 through November 2008. Study selection and data abstraction We included all studies quantifying learning time for Internet-based instruction for health professionals, compared with other instruction. Reviewers worked independently, in duplicate, to abstract information on interventions, outcomes, and study design. Results We identified 20 eligible studies. Random effects meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing Internet-based with non-Internet instruction (positive numbers indicating Internet longer) revealed pooled effect size (ES) for time -0.10 (p = 0.63). Among comparisons of two Internet-based interventions, providing feedback adds time (ES 0.67, p = 0.003, two studies), and greater interactivity generally takes longer (ES 0.25, p = 0.089, five studies). One study demonstrated that adapting to learner prior knowledge saves time without significantly affecting knowledge scores. Other studies revealed that audio narration, video clips, interactive models, and animations increase learning time but also facilitate higher knowledge and/or satisfaction. Across all studies, time correlated positively with knowledge outcomes (r = 0.53, p = 0.021). Conclusions On average, Internet-based instruction and non-computer instruction require similar time. Instructional strategies to enhance feedback and interactivity typically prolong learning time, but in many cases also enhance learning outcomes. Isolated examples suggest potential for improving efficiency in Internet-based instruction.
KW - Computer-assisted instruction
KW - Distance education
KW - Education, professional
KW - Educational technology
KW - Internet
KW - Learning efficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649908626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649908626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10459-010-9231-x
DO - 10.1007/s10459-010-9231-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20467807
AN - SCOPUS:78649908626
VL - 15
SP - 755
EP - 770
JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education
JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education
SN - 1382-4996
IS - 5
ER -