The Value of Rare Genetic Variation in the Prediction of Common Obesity in European Ancestry Populations

Zhe Wang, Shing Wan Choi, Nathalie Chami, Eric Boerwinkle, Myriam Fornage, Susan Redline, Joshua C. Bis, Jennifer A. Brody, Bruce M. Psaty, Wonji Kim, Merry Lynn N. McDonald, Elizabeth A. Regan, Edwin K. Silverman, Ching Ti Liu, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Rita R. Kalyani, Rasika A. Mathias, Lisa R. Yanek, Donna K. Arnett, Anne E. JusticeKari E. North, Robert Kaplan, Susan R Heckbert, Mariza de Andrade, Xiuqing Guo, Leslie A. Lange, Stephen S Rich, Jerome I. Rotter, Patrick T. Ellinor, Steven A. Lubitz, John Blangero, M. Benjamin Shoemaker, Dawood Darbar, Mark T. Gladwin, Christine M. Albert, Daniel I. Chasman, Rebecca D. Jackson, Charles Kooperberg, Alexander P. Reiner, Paul F. O’Reilly, Ruth J.F. Loos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) aggregate the effects of genetic variants across the genome and are used to predict risk of complex diseases, such as obesity. Current PRSs only include common variants (minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥1%), whereas the contribution of rare variants in PRSs to predict disease remains unknown. Here, we examine whether augmenting the standard common variant PRS (PRScommon) with a rare variant PRS (PRSrare) improves prediction of obesity. We used genome-wide genotyped and imputed data on 451,145 European-ancestry participants of the UK Biobank, as well as whole exome sequencing (WES) data on 184,385 participants. We performed single variant analyses (for both common and rare variants) and gene-based analyses (for rare variants) for association with BMI (kg/m2), obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), and extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). We built PRSscommon and PRSsrare using a range of methods (Clumping+Thresholding [C+T], PRS-CS, lassosum, gene-burden test). We selected the best-performing PRSs and assessed their performance in 36,757 European-ancestry unrelated participants with whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program. The best-performing PRScommon explained 10.1% of variation in BMI, and 18.3% and 22.5% of the susceptibility to obesity and extreme obesity, respectively, whereas the best-performing PRSrare explained 1.49%, and 2.97% and 3.68%, respectively. The PRSrare was associated with an increased risk of obesity and extreme obesity (ORobesity = 1.37 per SDPRS, Pobesity = 1.7x10-85; ORextremeobesity = 1.55 per SDPRS, Pextremeobesity = 3.8x10-40), which was attenuated, after adjusting for PRScommon (ORobesity = 1.08 per SDPRS, Pobesity = 9.8x10-6; ORextremeobesity= 1.09 per SDPRS, Pextremeobesity = 0.02). When PRSrare and PRScommon are combined, the increase in explained variance attributed to PRSrare was small (incremental Nagelkerke R2 = 0.24% for obesity and 0.51% for extreme obesity). Consistently, combining PRSrare to PRScommon provided little improvement to the prediction of obesity (PRSrare AUC = 0.591; PRScommon AUC = 0.708; PRScombined AUC = 0.710). In summary, while rare variants show convincing association with BMI, obesity and extreme obesity, the PRSrare provides limited improvement over PRScommon in the prediction of obesity risk, based on these large populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number863893
JournalFrontiers in Endocrinology
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2022

Keywords

  • BMI - body mass index
  • burden score
  • C+T
  • lassosum
  • obesity risk
  • polygenic risk score
  • PRS-CS
  • rare variants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Value of Rare Genetic Variation in the Prediction of Common Obesity in European Ancestry Populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this