The utility of magnetic stimulation for routine peripheral nerve conduction studies

Bruce A. Evans, William J. Litchy, Jasper R. Daube

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

The magnetic stimulator was compared with percutaneous electrical stimulation for activation of the median nerve at the wrist in four volunteers. Magnetic stimulation was unable to achieve supramaximal stimulation without activation of the ulnar nerve. The point of nerve depolarization could not be reliably estimated from the relationship of the stimulator head to the nerve. We conclude that the magnetic stimulator coil is as yet not suitable for routine electrodiagnositic use in the peripheral nervous system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1074-1078
Number of pages5
JournalMuscle & Nerve
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of magnetic stimulation for routine peripheral nerve conduction studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this