TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of patient factors to improve the prediction of operative duration using laparoscopic cholecystectomy
AU - Thiels, Cornelius A.
AU - Yu, Denny
AU - Abdelrahman, Amro M.
AU - Habermann, Elizabeth B.
AU - Hallbeck, Susan
AU - Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
AU - Bingener, Juliane
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This publication was made possible by funding from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mayo Clinic Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit for their support and help with data extraction.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Background: Reliable prediction of operative duration is essential for improving patient and care team satisfaction, optimizing resource utilization and reducing cost. Current operative scheduling systems are unreliable and contribute to costly over- and underestimation of operative time. We hypothesized that the inclusion of patient-specific factors would improve the accuracy in predicting operative duration. Methods: We reviewed all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at a single institution between 01/2007 and 06/2013. Concurrent procedures were excluded. Univariate analysis evaluated the effect of age, gender, BMI, ASA, laboratory values, smoking, and comorbidities on operative duration. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed using the significant factors (p < 0.05). The patient factors model was compared to the traditional surgical scheduling system estimates, which uses historical surgeon-specific and procedure-specific operative duration. External validation was done using the ACS-NSQIP database (n = 11,842). Results: A total of 1801 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients met inclusion criteria. Female sex was associated with reduced operative duration (−7.5 min, p < 0.001 vs. male sex) while increasing BMI (+5.1 min BMI 25–29.9, +6.9 min BMI 30–34.9, +10.4 min BMI 35–39.9, +17.0 min BMI 40 + , all p < 0.05 vs. normal BMI), increasing ASA (+7.4 min ASA III, +38.3 min ASA IV, all p < 0.01 vs. ASA I), and elevated liver function tests (+7.9 min, p < 0.01 vs. normal) were predictive of increased operative duration on univariate analysis. A model was then constructed using these predictive factors. The traditional surgical scheduling system was poorly predictive of actual operative duration (R2 = 0.001) compared to the patient factors model (R2 = 0.08). The model remained predictive on external validation (R2 = 0.14).The addition of surgeon as a variable in the institutional model further improved predictive ability of the model (R2 = 0.18). Conclusion: The use of routinely available pre-operative patient factors improves the prediction of operative duration during cholecystectomy.
AB - Background: Reliable prediction of operative duration is essential for improving patient and care team satisfaction, optimizing resource utilization and reducing cost. Current operative scheduling systems are unreliable and contribute to costly over- and underestimation of operative time. We hypothesized that the inclusion of patient-specific factors would improve the accuracy in predicting operative duration. Methods: We reviewed all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at a single institution between 01/2007 and 06/2013. Concurrent procedures were excluded. Univariate analysis evaluated the effect of age, gender, BMI, ASA, laboratory values, smoking, and comorbidities on operative duration. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed using the significant factors (p < 0.05). The patient factors model was compared to the traditional surgical scheduling system estimates, which uses historical surgeon-specific and procedure-specific operative duration. External validation was done using the ACS-NSQIP database (n = 11,842). Results: A total of 1801 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients met inclusion criteria. Female sex was associated with reduced operative duration (−7.5 min, p < 0.001 vs. male sex) while increasing BMI (+5.1 min BMI 25–29.9, +6.9 min BMI 30–34.9, +10.4 min BMI 35–39.9, +17.0 min BMI 40 + , all p < 0.05 vs. normal BMI), increasing ASA (+7.4 min ASA III, +38.3 min ASA IV, all p < 0.01 vs. ASA I), and elevated liver function tests (+7.9 min, p < 0.01 vs. normal) were predictive of increased operative duration on univariate analysis. A model was then constructed using these predictive factors. The traditional surgical scheduling system was poorly predictive of actual operative duration (R2 = 0.001) compared to the patient factors model (R2 = 0.08). The model remained predictive on external validation (R2 = 0.14).The addition of surgeon as a variable in the institutional model further improved predictive ability of the model (R2 = 0.18). Conclusion: The use of routinely available pre-operative patient factors improves the prediction of operative duration during cholecystectomy.
KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
KW - NSQIP
KW - Operative duration
KW - Patient factors
KW - Scheduling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978112050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978112050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-016-4976-9
DO - 10.1007/s00464-016-4976-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 27384547
AN - SCOPUS:84978112050
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 31
SP - 333
EP - 340
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -