The use of embolic protection device in lower extremity catheter-directed thrombolysis

Z. Irani, Rahmi Oklu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for acute limb ischemia(ALI) predominantly arising from thromboembolic disease in atherosclerotic plaques,bypass grafts (60%) or emboli from a proximal source (30%) [1,2]. Endovascular and opensurgical approaches are available for managing acute thrombotic events in ALI. Minimallyinvasive intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients demonstratessimilar success rates to those of surgery [3]. However, pharmacologic thrombolysis in gen-eral carries a risk of embolization of micro-debris to distal sites. Overall, the risk of distalembolization in endovascular procedures of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is around10% [4]. The use of embolic protection devices (EPD) results in up to 70% reduction inmicroembolic events in carotid artery interventions [5]. By contrast, catheter-directedthrombolysis with concomitant use of EPDs has not been previously reported in lowerextremity arteries.We present four patients with ALI in whom EPD was used during intra-arterial throm-bolytic infusion leading to reduced lytic time and pain while preserving distal runoffvessels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-275
Number of pages3
JournalDiagnostic and interventional imaging
Volume97
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Embolic Protection Devices
Lower Extremity
Ischemia
Catheters
Extremities
Endovascular Procedures
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Atherosclerotic Plaques
Femoral Artery
Embolism
Carotid Arteries
Arteries
Transplants
Pain

Keywords

  • Embolic protectiondevice
  • Stent
  • Thrombolysis
  • Thrombosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The use of embolic protection device in lower extremity catheter-directed thrombolysis. / Irani, Z.; Oklu, Rahmi.

In: Diagnostic and interventional imaging, Vol. 97, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 273-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aeb5b84133024fac86a9cd0e81171317,
title = "The use of embolic protection device in lower extremity catheter-directed thrombolysis",
abstract = "Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for acute limb ischemia(ALI) predominantly arising from thromboembolic disease in atherosclerotic plaques,bypass grafts (60{\%}) or emboli from a proximal source (30{\%}) [1,2]. Endovascular and opensurgical approaches are available for managing acute thrombotic events in ALI. Minimallyinvasive intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients demonstratessimilar success rates to those of surgery [3]. However, pharmacologic thrombolysis in gen-eral carries a risk of embolization of micro-debris to distal sites. Overall, the risk of distalembolization in endovascular procedures of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is around10{\%} [4]. The use of embolic protection devices (EPD) results in up to 70{\%} reduction inmicroembolic events in carotid artery interventions [5]. By contrast, catheter-directedthrombolysis with concomitant use of EPDs has not been previously reported in lowerextremity arteries.We present four patients with ALI in whom EPD was used during intra-arterial throm-bolytic infusion leading to reduced lytic time and pain while preserving distal runoffvessels.",
keywords = "Embolic protectiondevice, Stent, Thrombolysis, Thrombosis",
author = "Z. Irani and Rahmi Oklu",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "273--275",
journal = "Diagnostic and interventional imaging",
issn = "2211-5684",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of embolic protection device in lower extremity catheter-directed thrombolysis

AU - Irani, Z.

AU - Oklu, Rahmi

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for acute limb ischemia(ALI) predominantly arising from thromboembolic disease in atherosclerotic plaques,bypass grafts (60%) or emboli from a proximal source (30%) [1,2]. Endovascular and opensurgical approaches are available for managing acute thrombotic events in ALI. Minimallyinvasive intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients demonstratessimilar success rates to those of surgery [3]. However, pharmacologic thrombolysis in gen-eral carries a risk of embolization of micro-debris to distal sites. Overall, the risk of distalembolization in endovascular procedures of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is around10% [4]. The use of embolic protection devices (EPD) results in up to 70% reduction inmicroembolic events in carotid artery interventions [5]. By contrast, catheter-directedthrombolysis with concomitant use of EPDs has not been previously reported in lowerextremity arteries.We present four patients with ALI in whom EPD was used during intra-arterial throm-bolytic infusion leading to reduced lytic time and pain while preserving distal runoffvessels.

AB - Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for acute limb ischemia(ALI) predominantly arising from thromboembolic disease in atherosclerotic plaques,bypass grafts (60%) or emboli from a proximal source (30%) [1,2]. Endovascular and opensurgical approaches are available for managing acute thrombotic events in ALI. Minimallyinvasive intra-arterial catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients demonstratessimilar success rates to those of surgery [3]. However, pharmacologic thrombolysis in gen-eral carries a risk of embolization of micro-debris to distal sites. Overall, the risk of distalembolization in endovascular procedures of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is around10% [4]. The use of embolic protection devices (EPD) results in up to 70% reduction inmicroembolic events in carotid artery interventions [5]. By contrast, catheter-directedthrombolysis with concomitant use of EPDs has not been previously reported in lowerextremity arteries.We present four patients with ALI in whom EPD was used during intra-arterial throm-bolytic infusion leading to reduced lytic time and pain while preserving distal runoffvessels.

KW - Embolic protectiondevice

KW - Stent

KW - Thrombolysis

KW - Thrombosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992735127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992735127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 26725526

AN - SCOPUS:84992735127

VL - 97

SP - 273

EP - 275

JO - Diagnostic and interventional imaging

JF - Diagnostic and interventional imaging

SN - 2211-5684

IS - 2

ER -