The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States

Michael P. Harlander-Locke, Liv K. Harmon, Peter F. Lawrence, Gustavo Oderich, Robert A. McCready, Mark D. Morasch, Robert J. Feezor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection. Results Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60%), culture negative aortic graft infection (16%), enteric fistula/erosion (15%), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4%), and other (4%). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66%. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9%. Complications occurred in 24% and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5%) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years, and patient survival was 75% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years. Conclusions This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Allografts
Infection
Transplants
Extremities
False Aneurysm
Fistula
Mortality
Length of Stay
Compartment Syndromes
Femoral Artery
Multicenter Studies
Aneurysm
Rupture
Sepsis
Thrombosis
Therapeutics
Databases
Morbidity
Recurrence
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Harlander-Locke, M. P., Harmon, L. K., Lawrence, P. F., Oderich, G., McCready, R. A., Morasch, M. D., & Feezor, R. J. (2014). The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.009

The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States. / Harlander-Locke, Michael P.; Harmon, Liv K.; Lawrence, Peter F.; Oderich, Gustavo; McCready, Robert A.; Morasch, Mark D.; Feezor, Robert J.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 59, No. 3, 01.03.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harlander-Locke, Michael P. ; Harmon, Liv K. ; Lawrence, Peter F. ; Oderich, Gustavo ; McCready, Robert A. ; Morasch, Mark D. ; Feezor, Robert J. / The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 3.
@article{f1cda12866394b35824072f04e365603,
title = "The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States",
abstract = "Background Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection. Results Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60{\%}), culture negative aortic graft infection (16{\%}), enteric fistula/erosion (15{\%}), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4{\%}), and other (4{\%}). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66{\%}. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9{\%}. Complications occurred in 24{\%} and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5{\%}) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80{\%}, 88{\%}, and 97{\%}, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97{\%} at 5 years, and patient survival was 75{\%} at 1 year and 51{\%} at 5 years. Conclusions This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.",
author = "Harlander-Locke, {Michael P.} and Harmon, {Liv K.} and Lawrence, {Peter F.} and Gustavo Oderich and McCready, {Robert A.} and Morasch, {Mark D.} and Feezor, {Robert J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft for aortic reconstruction in the United States

AU - Harlander-Locke, Michael P.

AU - Harmon, Liv K.

AU - Lawrence, Peter F.

AU - Oderich, Gustavo

AU - McCready, Robert A.

AU - Morasch, Mark D.

AU - Feezor, Robert J.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Background Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection. Results Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60%), culture negative aortic graft infection (16%), enteric fistula/erosion (15%), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4%), and other (4%). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66%. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9%. Complications occurred in 24% and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5%) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years, and patient survival was 75% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years. Conclusions This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.

AB - Background Aortic infections, even with treatment, have a high mortality and risk of recurrent infection and limb loss. Cryopreserved aortoiliac allograft (CAA) has been proposed for aortic reconstruction to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods A multicenter study using a standardized database was performed at 14 of the 20 highest volume institutions that used CAA for aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for prosthetic graft infection. Results Two hundred twenty patients (mean age, 65; male:female, 1.6/1) were treated since 2002 for culture positive aortic graft infection (60%), culture negative aortic graft infection (16%), enteric fistula/erosion (15%), infected pseudoaneurysm adjacent to the aortic graft (4%), and other (4%). Intraop cultures indicated infection in 66%. Distal anastomosis was to the femoral artery and iliac. Mean hospital length of stay was 24 days, and 30-day mortality was 9%. Complications occurred in 24% and included persistent sepsis (n = 17), CAA thrombosis (n = 9), CAA rupture (n = 8), recurrent CAA/aortic infection (n = 8), CAA pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), recurrence of aortoenteric fistula (n = 4), and compartment syndrome (n = 1). Patients with full graft excision had significantly better outcomes. Ten (5%) patients required allograft explant. Mean follow-up was 30 ± 3 months. Freedom from graft-related complications, graft explant, and limb loss was 80%, 88%, and 97%, respectively, at 5 years. Primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years, and patient survival was 75% at 1 year and 51% at 5 years. Conclusions This largest study of CAA indicates that CAA allows aortic reconstruction in the setting of infection or those at high risk for infection with lower early and long-term morbidity and mortality than other previously reported treatment options. Repair with CAA is associated with low rates of aneurysm formation, recurrent infection, aortic blowout, and limb loss. We believe that CAA should be considered a first line treatment of aortic infections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894588197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894588197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 24239113

AN - SCOPUS:84894588197

VL - 59

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 3

ER -