The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis

C. Shub, R. E. Vlietstra, H. C. Smith, R. E. Fulton, L. R. Elveback

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine whether risk factors or angiographic features could be correlated with progression of coronary artery disease, we independently analyzed serial coronary angiograms in 65 symptomatic patients for progression without knowledge of their respective risk factors. An important design feature of this study was that observed variability of coronary lesion assessment was objectively evaluated and taken into account in defining progression of coronary artery disease. The reproducibility of lesion assessment varied with the severity of stenosis: moderate stenoses had the greatest intraobserver and interobserved variability. At initial study, 337 partial and 68 complete occlusions were identified. Of the 337 partial occlusions at risk of progression, 73 (22%) progresses; 13 (3.2%) of the initial lesions regressed. In the 65 patients with persistent or increasing angina, progression occurred in 51 (78%) over a mean period of 24 months. Apart from the tendency of high-grade stenoses (≤98%) to progress to complete occlusion, no measured clinical, laboratory, or angiographic variable showed any significant effect on progression of coronary artery disease. Therefore, although certain risk factors may predispose to coronary artery disease, in this selected group of symptomatic patients these same risk factor did not predict its progression. We believe that any definition of progression should incorporate the factor of observer variability and therapeutic measures designed to influence progression of coronary artery disease should take into account this apparently unpredictable progression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-160
Number of pages6
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume56
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Disease
Pathologic Constriction
Observer Variation
Angiography
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Shub, C., Vlietstra, R. E., Smith, H. C., Fulton, R. E., & Elveback, L. R. (1981). The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 56(3), 155-160.

The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis. / Shub, C.; Vlietstra, R. E.; Smith, H. C.; Fulton, R. E.; Elveback, L. R.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1981, p. 155-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shub, C, Vlietstra, RE, Smith, HC, Fulton, RE & Elveback, LR 1981, 'The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis', Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 155-160.
Shub, C. ; Vlietstra, R. E. ; Smith, H. C. ; Fulton, R. E. ; Elveback, L. R. / The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1981 ; Vol. 56, No. 3. pp. 155-160.
@article{e8cf3bd5a96141b38628e27ce6eeb108,
title = "The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis",
abstract = "To determine whether risk factors or angiographic features could be correlated with progression of coronary artery disease, we independently analyzed serial coronary angiograms in 65 symptomatic patients for progression without knowledge of their respective risk factors. An important design feature of this study was that observed variability of coronary lesion assessment was objectively evaluated and taken into account in defining progression of coronary artery disease. The reproducibility of lesion assessment varied with the severity of stenosis: moderate stenoses had the greatest intraobserver and interobserved variability. At initial study, 337 partial and 68 complete occlusions were identified. Of the 337 partial occlusions at risk of progression, 73 (22{\%}) progresses; 13 (3.2{\%}) of the initial lesions regressed. In the 65 patients with persistent or increasing angina, progression occurred in 51 (78{\%}) over a mean period of 24 months. Apart from the tendency of high-grade stenoses (≤98{\%}) to progress to complete occlusion, no measured clinical, laboratory, or angiographic variable showed any significant effect on progression of coronary artery disease. Therefore, although certain risk factors may predispose to coronary artery disease, in this selected group of symptomatic patients these same risk factor did not predict its progression. We believe that any definition of progression should incorporate the factor of observer variability and therapeutic measures designed to influence progression of coronary artery disease should take into account this apparently unpredictable progression.",
author = "C. Shub and Vlietstra, {R. E.} and Smith, {H. C.} and Fulton, {R. E.} and Elveback, {L. R.}",
year = "1981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "155--160",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unpredictable progression of symptomatic coronary artery disease. A serial clinical-angiographic analysis

AU - Shub, C.

AU - Vlietstra, R. E.

AU - Smith, H. C.

AU - Fulton, R. E.

AU - Elveback, L. R.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - To determine whether risk factors or angiographic features could be correlated with progression of coronary artery disease, we independently analyzed serial coronary angiograms in 65 symptomatic patients for progression without knowledge of their respective risk factors. An important design feature of this study was that observed variability of coronary lesion assessment was objectively evaluated and taken into account in defining progression of coronary artery disease. The reproducibility of lesion assessment varied with the severity of stenosis: moderate stenoses had the greatest intraobserver and interobserved variability. At initial study, 337 partial and 68 complete occlusions were identified. Of the 337 partial occlusions at risk of progression, 73 (22%) progresses; 13 (3.2%) of the initial lesions regressed. In the 65 patients with persistent or increasing angina, progression occurred in 51 (78%) over a mean period of 24 months. Apart from the tendency of high-grade stenoses (≤98%) to progress to complete occlusion, no measured clinical, laboratory, or angiographic variable showed any significant effect on progression of coronary artery disease. Therefore, although certain risk factors may predispose to coronary artery disease, in this selected group of symptomatic patients these same risk factor did not predict its progression. We believe that any definition of progression should incorporate the factor of observer variability and therapeutic measures designed to influence progression of coronary artery disease should take into account this apparently unpredictable progression.

AB - To determine whether risk factors or angiographic features could be correlated with progression of coronary artery disease, we independently analyzed serial coronary angiograms in 65 symptomatic patients for progression without knowledge of their respective risk factors. An important design feature of this study was that observed variability of coronary lesion assessment was objectively evaluated and taken into account in defining progression of coronary artery disease. The reproducibility of lesion assessment varied with the severity of stenosis: moderate stenoses had the greatest intraobserver and interobserved variability. At initial study, 337 partial and 68 complete occlusions were identified. Of the 337 partial occlusions at risk of progression, 73 (22%) progresses; 13 (3.2%) of the initial lesions regressed. In the 65 patients with persistent or increasing angina, progression occurred in 51 (78%) over a mean period of 24 months. Apart from the tendency of high-grade stenoses (≤98%) to progress to complete occlusion, no measured clinical, laboratory, or angiographic variable showed any significant effect on progression of coronary artery disease. Therefore, although certain risk factors may predispose to coronary artery disease, in this selected group of symptomatic patients these same risk factor did not predict its progression. We believe that any definition of progression should incorporate the factor of observer variability and therapeutic measures designed to influence progression of coronary artery disease should take into account this apparently unpredictable progression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019724785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019724785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7206792

AN - SCOPUS:0019724785

VL - 56

SP - 155

EP - 160

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 3

ER -