The two-warehouse material location selection problem

Phichet Wutthisirisart, Mustafa Sir, James S. Noble

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Companies often require additional warehouse space due to increased demand and often the option of building a warehouse is not feasible due to a high investment cost. As a result excess inventory that cannot be stored in owned warehouses is transferred to third-party warehouses for which the company pays rent, as well as incurs labor and transportation costs for storing items and moving items back to the production site. In this situation, the company ends up with two warehouses - owned and rented. This research introduces the material location selection problem that allocates materials to these two warehouses while minimizing the total storage and transportation costs. Four material location models/policies, each with different decision restrictions, are proposed to solve the problem from different material handling perspectives. The four models are analyzed and contrasted with each other based on data derived from a real industrial scenario. The case results show a cost savings opportunity between 20-40% due to reassigning materials between the rented and owned warehouses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)780-789
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume170
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Warehouses
Costs
Industry
Materials handling
Warehouse
Personnel

Keywords

  • Material location selection
  • Owned/rented warehouses
  • Third party logistics
  • Warehouse management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

The two-warehouse material location selection problem. / Wutthisirisart, Phichet; Sir, Mustafa; Noble, James S.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 170, 01.12.2015, p. 780-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wutthisirisart, Phichet ; Sir, Mustafa ; Noble, James S. / The two-warehouse material location selection problem. In: International Journal of Production Economics. 2015 ; Vol. 170. pp. 780-789.
@article{47f11f06ce48418eacba6ab7563c7e20,
title = "The two-warehouse material location selection problem",
abstract = "Companies often require additional warehouse space due to increased demand and often the option of building a warehouse is not feasible due to a high investment cost. As a result excess inventory that cannot be stored in owned warehouses is transferred to third-party warehouses for which the company pays rent, as well as incurs labor and transportation costs for storing items and moving items back to the production site. In this situation, the company ends up with two warehouses - owned and rented. This research introduces the material location selection problem that allocates materials to these two warehouses while minimizing the total storage and transportation costs. Four material location models/policies, each with different decision restrictions, are proposed to solve the problem from different material handling perspectives. The four models are analyzed and contrasted with each other based on data derived from a real industrial scenario. The case results show a cost savings opportunity between 20-40{\%} due to reassigning materials between the rented and owned warehouses.",
keywords = "Material location selection, Owned/rented warehouses, Third party logistics, Warehouse management",
author = "Phichet Wutthisirisart and Mustafa Sir and Noble, {James S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "780--789",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The two-warehouse material location selection problem

AU - Wutthisirisart, Phichet

AU - Sir, Mustafa

AU - Noble, James S.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Companies often require additional warehouse space due to increased demand and often the option of building a warehouse is not feasible due to a high investment cost. As a result excess inventory that cannot be stored in owned warehouses is transferred to third-party warehouses for which the company pays rent, as well as incurs labor and transportation costs for storing items and moving items back to the production site. In this situation, the company ends up with two warehouses - owned and rented. This research introduces the material location selection problem that allocates materials to these two warehouses while minimizing the total storage and transportation costs. Four material location models/policies, each with different decision restrictions, are proposed to solve the problem from different material handling perspectives. The four models are analyzed and contrasted with each other based on data derived from a real industrial scenario. The case results show a cost savings opportunity between 20-40% due to reassigning materials between the rented and owned warehouses.

AB - Companies often require additional warehouse space due to increased demand and often the option of building a warehouse is not feasible due to a high investment cost. As a result excess inventory that cannot be stored in owned warehouses is transferred to third-party warehouses for which the company pays rent, as well as incurs labor and transportation costs for storing items and moving items back to the production site. In this situation, the company ends up with two warehouses - owned and rented. This research introduces the material location selection problem that allocates materials to these two warehouses while minimizing the total storage and transportation costs. Four material location models/policies, each with different decision restrictions, are proposed to solve the problem from different material handling perspectives. The four models are analyzed and contrasted with each other based on data derived from a real industrial scenario. The case results show a cost savings opportunity between 20-40% due to reassigning materials between the rented and owned warehouses.

KW - Material location selection

KW - Owned/rented warehouses

KW - Third party logistics

KW - Warehouse management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938149784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938149784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.008

M3 - Article

VL - 170

SP - 780

EP - 789

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

ER -