TY - JOUR
T1 - The tobacco industry's political efforts to derail the EPA report on ETS
AU - Muggli, Monique E.
AU - Hurt, Richard D.
AU - Repace, James
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 CA90791 Tobacco Industry Documents on ETS—The Next Front. It was presented in part at the Ninth Annual Scientific Session of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, New Orleans, LA, 21 February 2003.
PY - 2004/2
Y1 - 2004/2
N2 - Previously secret tobacco industry documents detailed a multifaceted approach of political strategies aimed to derail the 1993 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk assessment on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). These pervasive strategies included the following: (1) lobbying the first Bush Administration to approve an executive order that would impose new risk assessment standards for federal agencies, thus delaying the release of the EPA report; (2) having the first Bush Administration transfer jurisdiction over ETS from the EPA to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), thus obviating the need for the release of the EPA report; and (3) applying enormous political pressure directly by alleging improper procedure and policy at EPA. Although some of the attempted strategies failed, the political pressure from Congressman Thomas Bliley (R-VA) was a success. This is the first report showing how a single member of Congress in conjunction with his staff, tobacco industry attorneys, and executives worked very aggressively to do the tobacco industry's bidding. These tactics successfully delayed the EPA risk assessment and placed a cloud over its validity that was not fully vindicated until December 2002 when the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the tobacco industry's suit against the EPA. The documents show that the industry will expend whatever effort is necessary to protect itself from public health policy that would adversely affect consumption of cigarettes and, therefore, profit.
AB - Previously secret tobacco industry documents detailed a multifaceted approach of political strategies aimed to derail the 1993 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk assessment on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). These pervasive strategies included the following: (1) lobbying the first Bush Administration to approve an executive order that would impose new risk assessment standards for federal agencies, thus delaying the release of the EPA report; (2) having the first Bush Administration transfer jurisdiction over ETS from the EPA to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), thus obviating the need for the release of the EPA report; and (3) applying enormous political pressure directly by alleging improper procedure and policy at EPA. Although some of the attempted strategies failed, the political pressure from Congressman Thomas Bliley (R-VA) was a success. This is the first report showing how a single member of Congress in conjunction with his staff, tobacco industry attorneys, and executives worked very aggressively to do the tobacco industry's bidding. These tactics successfully delayed the EPA risk assessment and placed a cloud over its validity that was not fully vindicated until December 2002 when the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the tobacco industry's suit against the EPA. The documents show that the industry will expend whatever effort is necessary to protect itself from public health policy that would adversely affect consumption of cigarettes and, therefore, profit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642497541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642497541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.015
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.015
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14751332
AN - SCOPUS:1642497541
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 26
SP - 167
EP - 177
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -