The spatial and temporal variability of the indoor environmental quality during three simulated office studies at a living lab

Nicholas Clements, Rongpeng Zhang, Anja Jamrozik, Carolina Campanella, Brent A Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The living lab approach to building science research provides the ability to accurately monitor occupants and their environment and use the resulting data to evaluate the impact that various components of the built environment have on human comfort, health, and well-being. A hypothesized benefit of the living lab approach is the ability to simulate the real indoor environment in an experimentally controlled setting over relatively long periods of time, overcoming a significant hurdle encountered in many chamber-type experimental designs that rarely reflect typical indoor environments. Here, we present indoor environmental quality measurements from a network of sensors as well as building system design and operational data demonstrating the ability of a living lab to realistically simulate a wide range of environmental conditions in an office setting by varying air temperature, lighting, façade control, and sound masking in a series of three human subject experiments. The temporal variability of thermal and lighting conditions was assessed on an hourly basis and demonstrated the significant impact of façade design and control on desk-level measurements of both factors. Additional factors, such as desk layout and building system design (e.g., luminaires, speaker system), also contributed significantly to spatial variability in air temperature, lighting, and sound masking exposures, and this variability was reduced in latter experiments by optimizing desk layout and building system design. While ecologically valid experimental conditions are possible with a living lab, a compromise between realism and consistency in participant experience must often be found by, for example, using an atypical desk layout to reduce spatial variability in natural light exposure. Based on the experiences from these three studies, experimental design and environmental monitoring considerations for future office-based living lab experiments are explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number62
JournalBuildings
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Speech intelligibility
Lighting
Systems analysis
Design of experiments
Acoustic waves
Lighting fixtures
Plant layout
Level measurement
Experiments
Air
Health
Temperature
Monitoring
Sensors
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Building science
  • Experimental design
  • Indoor environmental quality
  • Internet of things
  • living lab
  • Ubiquitous sensing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

The spatial and temporal variability of the indoor environmental quality during three simulated office studies at a living lab. / Clements, Nicholas; Zhang, Rongpeng; Jamrozik, Anja; Campanella, Carolina; Bauer, Brent A.

In: Buildings, Vol. 9, No. 3, 62, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clements, Nicholas ; Zhang, Rongpeng ; Jamrozik, Anja ; Campanella, Carolina ; Bauer, Brent A. / The spatial and temporal variability of the indoor environmental quality during three simulated office studies at a living lab. In: Buildings. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 3.
@article{d448609a32cc4463ae63bd14a46f8f3a,
title = "The spatial and temporal variability of the indoor environmental quality during three simulated office studies at a living lab",
abstract = "The living lab approach to building science research provides the ability to accurately monitor occupants and their environment and use the resulting data to evaluate the impact that various components of the built environment have on human comfort, health, and well-being. A hypothesized benefit of the living lab approach is the ability to simulate the real indoor environment in an experimentally controlled setting over relatively long periods of time, overcoming a significant hurdle encountered in many chamber-type experimental designs that rarely reflect typical indoor environments. Here, we present indoor environmental quality measurements from a network of sensors as well as building system design and operational data demonstrating the ability of a living lab to realistically simulate a wide range of environmental conditions in an office setting by varying air temperature, lighting, fa{\cc}ade control, and sound masking in a series of three human subject experiments. The temporal variability of thermal and lighting conditions was assessed on an hourly basis and demonstrated the significant impact of fa{\cc}ade design and control on desk-level measurements of both factors. Additional factors, such as desk layout and building system design (e.g., luminaires, speaker system), also contributed significantly to spatial variability in air temperature, lighting, and sound masking exposures, and this variability was reduced in latter experiments by optimizing desk layout and building system design. While ecologically valid experimental conditions are possible with a living lab, a compromise between realism and consistency in participant experience must often be found by, for example, using an atypical desk layout to reduce spatial variability in natural light exposure. Based on the experiences from these three studies, experimental design and environmental monitoring considerations for future office-based living lab experiments are explored.",
keywords = "Building science, Experimental design, Indoor environmental quality, Internet of things, living lab, Ubiquitous sensing",
author = "Nicholas Clements and Rongpeng Zhang and Anja Jamrozik and Carolina Campanella and Bauer, {Brent A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/buildings9030062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Buildings",
issn = "2075-5309",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The spatial and temporal variability of the indoor environmental quality during three simulated office studies at a living lab

AU - Clements, Nicholas

AU - Zhang, Rongpeng

AU - Jamrozik, Anja

AU - Campanella, Carolina

AU - Bauer, Brent A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The living lab approach to building science research provides the ability to accurately monitor occupants and their environment and use the resulting data to evaluate the impact that various components of the built environment have on human comfort, health, and well-being. A hypothesized benefit of the living lab approach is the ability to simulate the real indoor environment in an experimentally controlled setting over relatively long periods of time, overcoming a significant hurdle encountered in many chamber-type experimental designs that rarely reflect typical indoor environments. Here, we present indoor environmental quality measurements from a network of sensors as well as building system design and operational data demonstrating the ability of a living lab to realistically simulate a wide range of environmental conditions in an office setting by varying air temperature, lighting, façade control, and sound masking in a series of three human subject experiments. The temporal variability of thermal and lighting conditions was assessed on an hourly basis and demonstrated the significant impact of façade design and control on desk-level measurements of both factors. Additional factors, such as desk layout and building system design (e.g., luminaires, speaker system), also contributed significantly to spatial variability in air temperature, lighting, and sound masking exposures, and this variability was reduced in latter experiments by optimizing desk layout and building system design. While ecologically valid experimental conditions are possible with a living lab, a compromise between realism and consistency in participant experience must often be found by, for example, using an atypical desk layout to reduce spatial variability in natural light exposure. Based on the experiences from these three studies, experimental design and environmental monitoring considerations for future office-based living lab experiments are explored.

AB - The living lab approach to building science research provides the ability to accurately monitor occupants and their environment and use the resulting data to evaluate the impact that various components of the built environment have on human comfort, health, and well-being. A hypothesized benefit of the living lab approach is the ability to simulate the real indoor environment in an experimentally controlled setting over relatively long periods of time, overcoming a significant hurdle encountered in many chamber-type experimental designs that rarely reflect typical indoor environments. Here, we present indoor environmental quality measurements from a network of sensors as well as building system design and operational data demonstrating the ability of a living lab to realistically simulate a wide range of environmental conditions in an office setting by varying air temperature, lighting, façade control, and sound masking in a series of three human subject experiments. The temporal variability of thermal and lighting conditions was assessed on an hourly basis and demonstrated the significant impact of façade design and control on desk-level measurements of both factors. Additional factors, such as desk layout and building system design (e.g., luminaires, speaker system), also contributed significantly to spatial variability in air temperature, lighting, and sound masking exposures, and this variability was reduced in latter experiments by optimizing desk layout and building system design. While ecologically valid experimental conditions are possible with a living lab, a compromise between realism and consistency in participant experience must often be found by, for example, using an atypical desk layout to reduce spatial variability in natural light exposure. Based on the experiences from these three studies, experimental design and environmental monitoring considerations for future office-based living lab experiments are explored.

KW - Building science

KW - Experimental design

KW - Indoor environmental quality

KW - Internet of things

KW - living lab

KW - Ubiquitous sensing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063914557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063914557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/buildings9030062

DO - 10.3390/buildings9030062

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Buildings

JF - Buildings

SN - 2075-5309

IS - 3

M1 - 62

ER -